Empking wrote:Vote: Hiphop
over reaction to a backed up joke.
I don't get it.
Sposh wrote:Vote: Messiah
for jumping on CoCo's post 64 without really adding anything or questioning it.
I would think that it would be a CoolDoG vote. It was he that voted and didn't add or question, but than again that could be his style as noted by milkshake 67
here
Messiah wrote:Why did you single me out when CooLDoG and CoCo did the exact same thing?
CooLDoG did, but CoCo didn't.
Peabody wrote:Hiphop looks very jumpy to me. Usually in the RVS I can pick out scum through gut feeling. The fact that he didn't take an RVS vote very well tells me that he has something to hide.
Are you talking about your first vote? I said quite clearly, if it was random, AlmasterGM needs a bs reason. Where is your info coming from of me not taking a bs reason very well?
Peabody wrote:HipHop wrote:So it was bs. Defensive? If you attacked me, I have a right to defend. What do you expect me to do, flop over and wave the white flag?
Well, that is essentially what most people do during the RVS. The votes are to be taken with a grain of salt.
That quote that you quoted, was me commenting if your first vote was not random. What you said in
post 50. The only reason you said I was getting defensive was because of me saying if your vote was not random, I wanted a reason. Because your vote is random, I don't care about it.
charlatan wrote:On a more serious note, do you think Hoopla's confusing-but-excellent-random-voting-shake-the-boat technique (I'm hoping the name catches on) actually made her more likely to be scum, or did you see erratic play and decide it'd be a safe place to drop a vote?
You said confusing right? Why would a town want confusion? I did not vote for her for either reason. I voted because she refuses in a silent kind of way, to not to answer my questions.
charlatan wrote:My problem with this is that CoCo didn't actually
say
much of anything with that post, nor did he vote. What you're "agreeing" with is the statement that "this stands out", which has almost zero content to it. I would expect to see some sort of question or accusation go along with this. It looks a bit like borrowing someone else's soft suspicion and running with it, getting called on it, and then backpedaling with 'oops, I mistook the definition of the word.'
Why is everybody attacking Messiah, when CooLDoG did the exact same thing? He asked a question. Sposh started the bw on Messiah, because he did not ask a question, when he did. I hate it when people attack one person for a certain action, when other people do the exact same thing.
charlatan wrote:Minor FoS: CooLDoG
for piling on, but I don't think early-game bandwagons are necessarily a bad thing.
Why the FOS than?
Hoopla wrote: On a more serious note, I'm quite confident Messiah is scum, and I encourage others to view his posts. Can we please bandwagon him now?
Vote: Messiah
Same thing CD and MS did. Why not a bw on Hoopla?
Peabody wrote:Hoopla, you missed my question:
Nope just ignores questions (she?) doesn't want to answer. Pretends they are not there.