(
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to send someone to hell.
Ouch. Well that sucks for meta-players, Kiku's playing hard-ball. Is this the general consensus?kikuchiyo's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1900269#1900269]Post 113[/url] wrote:I clearly stated that I did not want to pursue the discussion. Obviously I have my reasons and would rather not discuss them at this time. I think the ensuing conversation has potential to be detrimental to town. I would rather revisit the issue when necessary.Konowa wrote:kikcuhiyo, you seem to be really pushing this gap in logic on fuzzy. Why no vote? Why drop the issue, as you say in post 44?
As of yet, saberwolf and doombunny's humor is not impressive. I don't see how extending the random/joke phase does us any good. I think Chaco has the right idea here:
Vote: saberwolffor the wanton distraction that is post 95. Deliberately making yourself a difficult read may work well for your meta, but I would rather lynch the jokers rather than having to deal with the wifom surrounding their alignments at a later date. So I guess I could say I would support a policy lynch seeing as how I don't think this thread has progressed much beyond the RVS.
I was going to ask this to just you, but I'll ask it to everybody: How is it possible to make yourself a hard read? What actions could be taken as scummy and what actions could be taken as pro-town? Is it more of a beauty in the eye of the beholder type thing?saberwolf's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1900866#1900866]Post 124[/url] wrote:EBWOP: to clarify, yes I have no problem with you accusing me of not realy doing much scumhuntingwise, but I feel the attack was slightly overexcessive, but that's ok, because it's actually helped me. I think Chaco is town, simply because I don't think scum would try to pull off something like that...they'd try to find something more scummy.
Are weDoombunny9's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=1901117#1901117]Post 127[/url] wrote:Ok, quick post time cuz I don't have that much time to comment right now. I'll give a better post tomorrow.
Amished-Is there anyone you think is scum/town at this point yet?
Chaco-Who are the people who are detrimental to the town?
Chaco again-Does sabers defence change your veiws on saber?
I HAVE NO META!!!!!Chaco wrote:Detrimental to town would have to be Saber alone at this time. You have joked, however, you have posted other content. Where as Saber is just now coming around on, let's call it page 6. (End of Page 5)
No it doesn't really. I have played with him before, and can recognize differences in his play and meta off of current games.
I like this ^-^. I don't mind using meta to implicate someone but it's pointless to use it to clear them.TBH I'm sort of an anti-meta player, I judge by the actions you make in this game. I don't care if you act scummy all the time, if you act scummy here I'm going to push your lynch. I dislike people trying to 'disguise' their meta by playing worse as town so they can play better as mafia.
This is a good question.
Why are you voting Neo looker?
Konowa wrote:unvote;
vote Netopalis
reasons for voting with no reasons guys? Konowa I kinda expect it from, but I don't know about Amished.Amished wrote:Unvote
Vote: Netopalis
Amished wrote:lol if 144 isn't enough of a reason for you, you're scum too. Oh wait, I already pegged you as scum, good deal.