Newbie 827 - Store Katana (Scum Win!)

julienvonwolfe · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:07 am

Oh. Looking at the set-up, it looks as if we have a 50% chance of a cop. If you're the cop, you might consider claiming - even if you only have two innocent results. This would tell us who the scum are.

My reasoning goes: Five players left today; two are confirmed innocent, one is the cop, two scum left.

Of course, if you have a guilty result on anybody, just come straight out with it so we can lynch the scum sharpish.

Wysp · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:50 pm

<<

>>

^^;

I'm gonna go with my gut on this...

I'm the cop. My investigation last night was on NAW, and I got a guilty. RayFrost is innocent.

Vote: NAW

RayFrost · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:43 pm

Wysp wrote:<<

>>

^^;

I'm gonna go with my gut on this...

I'm the cop. My investigation last night was on NAW, and I got a guilty. RayFrost is innocent.

Vote: NAW

so you investigated me/person I replaced N1? Cool, that just limits it to Julien & orph, unless you are scum... in which case we lose.

hrm...

What was your reasoning for investigating me/ori N1?

Wysp · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:53 pm

Everyone in that slot lurked and did suspicious stuff. I wanted to confirm.

RayFrost · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:04 pm

Wysp wrote:Everyone in that slot lurked and did suspicious stuff. I wanted to confirm.

except me, you mean?

also, ori was the only person in the slot before me >.>

julienvonwolfe · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:13 pm

Hmm. Correct procedure would be to wait and see if there are any counterclaims to Wysp, but due to the doctor lynch and their own roles, scum would be able to work out whether or not there was a cop.

We should wait for NAW to respond.

orphevs · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:10 pm

I don't CC it. There's no CC from you two, right? So NAW's the only one who could CC now? Just want to make sure I get this whole CC thing.

RayFrost · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:13 pm

orphevs wrote:I don't CC it. There's no CC from you two, right? So NAW's the only one who could CC now? Just want to make sure I get this whole CC thing.

If I was going to CC, I'd have done so already.

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:25 am

Wysp is a liar.
I know all the evidence is against me, but i am innocent.

vote: wysp

ill post more withing the next 6 hours, my lunch is up.

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:16 am

Okay, so the deal right now is, either Wysp or I am lying. I know i'm not. However, the general consensus is that wysp is town because his earlyer scum behavior was conceived as noob behavior *even i had thought so), and since day one ive been at the upper part of people scumdars to say the least. So everything is against me ATM, and i really don't know what to say, so a the very least noone vote for anyone for at least a few days so we can go over any information we need, no mater how strong your feeling or opinions may be (if you vote for me, the other scum may instantly vote and WIN THE WHOLE GAME

). I know i seem hypocritical, but i acctualy KNOW that wysp is scum, but it can't be proven to anyone but me unfortunately.

Basicly, its come down to who you belive more, me or wysp, and unfortuneatly, its not looking good for the town.

I will definatly be disecting wysp's post to find some contradictions.

Wysp · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:46 pm

also, ori was the only person in the slot before me >.>

Wait, what? Well I botched that. I thought you replaced adam, but I guess I'm mistaken. *shrug*

Well, at least I know you're a townie, that never hurts.

I don't have much to say to NAW's claim. I was adjusting, I botched up because I wasn't expecting that kind of stuff, I managed to figure out the lay of the land. *shrug*

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:12 pm

Wait, what? Well I botched that. I thought you replaced adam, but I guess I'm mistaken. *shrug*

So now you are confuse about who you investigated night 1?
How could you be confused about who he replaced? Your saying everyone in the slot of N1 was suspicious so you investigated, ye your saying that a totaly different player (rayfrost/orimarui) is innocent?
Can you say scumslip?

julienvonwolfe · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:25 pm

Well, if it's just a matter of being confused about who replaced who... the number of replacements in this game is a bit difficult to keep track of. Wysp, do you remember who you investigated on that night? (The exact player, not the slot).

Also, did you breadcrumb at all?

Wysp · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 1:47 pm

I investigated adam.

Assuming I'm right about what breadcrumb means...
I did a few times, mostly non-emphasizing the lurker-suspiciousness. I saw XScorp lurkerhunting and I didn't know if that was standard procedure here, so I tried to steer the game away from adam by focusing on others.

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:11 pm

I investigated adam.

Thats nice. Too bad AdamRights replaced day 2.

Scum.

RayFrost · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:16 pm

NewAgeWarrior wrote:
I investigated adam.
Thats nice. Too bad AdamRights replaced day 2.

Scum.

umm... how does AdamRights replacing in D2 change the result of the N1 investigation?

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:49 pm

My investigation last night was on NAW, and I got a guilty

I investigated adam.

How could he investigate 2 people the same night? And what does this have to do with Ray being innocent?
He suddenly claims cops and there are this many contradictions this soon?
He's the cop, and he has had only 2 investigations to do, yet hes really that confused on who he investigated?

Wysp, do you remember who you investigated on that night? (The exact player, not the slot).

I investigated adam.

My investigation last night was on NAW, and I got a guilty

Thats nice. Too bad AdamRights replaced day 2.

He can't have investigated 2 people in the same night.

RayFrost · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:58 pm

"that night" was N1...

RayFrost · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:00 pm

I'll sort out his claim for you, NAW, since you seem to be misunderstanding it brutally:

Wysp claimed to have investigated you N2.

He also claimed to have investigated me N1 (thinking I was the replacement for adam).

Then, it was sorted out I had not replaced Adam, he clarified that he had investigated adam.

RayFrost · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:01 pm

EBWOP:

that he had investigated adam N1 (and thus had the innocent on whoever replaced him, ie: orph)

Wysp · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:08 pm

Yeah. I thought that Ray was his replacement. That was my error.

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:11 pm

Adam was not playing during night 1.
Plus he said that you were innocent but he never investigated you.

RayFrost · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:13 pm

NewAgeWarrior wrote:Adam was not playing during night 1.
Plus he said that you were innocent but he never investigated you.

seriously, he thought I was the guy that replaced Adam, which would mean that he had the innocent on me.

NewAgeWarrior · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:13 pm

So, Wysp, state EXACTLY who you investigated and when.

Wysp · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:28 pm

I already did. Adam, the night that Excedrin died. Which, if I recall correctly, was N1.

Now, please give your defense for yourself. An ad hominem attack only works aggressively; just because I'm accusing you doesn't mean you should drop your defense and attack me.

Defend yourself, don't just attack me. I've explained myself, now you explain yourself. You have scum marked all over you, and as soon as I claim cop you want me lynched. That doesn't sound townie to me.