Open 172 - Mini Love - GAME OVER!

Looker · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:58 pm

Well if that's not a hyperbole, then what is...?

Sidenote: Do I need to use smilies to indicate jokes? Cuz I'm no good wit da smilies...

The Mole's Third Scumday VOTE COUNT

Looker (3): Head_Honcho, Netlava, Nikanor
Nikanor (2): dramonic, Locke Lamora
animorpherv1 (1): Looker
Slepz (1): Vino
dramonic (1): Snow_Bunny
Snow_Bunny (1): animorpherv1
Vino (1): Khamisa

Not Voting (2): Slepz, Yankee

With 12 Alive, 7 is needed to lynch.

dramonic · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:02 pm

Hyperbole:

(after blowing up a city)

DudeB: Grats, you just killed a few million innocent to please your madness.
Madman: That's not true, I haven't even killed 1 million.
DudeB: It's an hyperbole, you know what I meant.

Basically, gross exageration that isnt a metaphor.

Looker · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:09 pm

O, okay. Well...I still don't get it but thanks, I now know what a hyperbole is...i think...

Yankee · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:21 pm

Vote Dramonic

For giving such a violent description of a hyperbole. Only a mafia would be so violent!

dramonic · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:20 am

Well, radicalness makes things clear

Locke Lamora · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:33 am

Vote: Yankee

For trying to prolong the RVS.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:34 am

Sorry, that should be:

Unvote; Vote: Yankee

This is not a random vote.

Yankee · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:23 am

then please explain your reasoning if it is not random.

Nikanor · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:45 am

Yankee wrote:then please explain your reasoning if it is not random.

Locke wrote:Vote: Yankee

For trying to prolong the RVS.

Unvote. Vote: Yankee.

For obviously not reading the thread.

Khamisa · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:00 am

dramonic's description is not only violent, but incorrect.

"I've said this a million times" is a hyperbole. The person in dramonic's representation actually did kill millions of people.

Nikanor · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:03 am

Khamisa wrote:"I've said this a million times" is a hyperbole. The person in dramonic's representation actually did kill millions of people.

Maybe he teleported everyone but five people out of the city before blowing it up.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:42 am

Netlava wrote:
animorpherv1 wrote:I'd love to vote Looker, but I don't think that's the right move right now.
Huh? Why not?

Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.

dramonic · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:27 am

He killed less than a million in my case.

Nikanor · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:29 am

ani wrote:Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.

In your opinion, how bad is an L-2 vote in the RVS?

Looker · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:32 pm

Oooh, pick me.

Netlava · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:22 pm

Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.

4th vote would be L-3. What caused you to think that a Looker vote would be appealing in the first place?

Head_Honcho · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:44 pm

I am so sorry I said hyperbole.

Nikanor wrote:
ani wrote:Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.
In your opinion, how bad is an L-2 vote in the RVS?

I wouldn't have considered it RVS at that point, I found the defensiveness legitimately scummy.

I'm curious too! Why would you 'love to vote Looker'?

Slepz · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:12 pm

Okay, the RVS is over. Officially.
I'm going to

Vote: Locke Lamora

because of his (IMO) unjustified vote on Yankee.

Looker · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:03 pm

Yankee wrote:then please explain your reasoning if it is not random.

Was this vote ever explained?

dramonic wrote:He killed less than a million in my case.

Any scum amongst the ranks or were these all townies?

Nikanor wrote:
ani wrote:Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.
In your opinion, how bad is an L-2 vote in the RVS?

Not bad at all when you know who you're lynching is not on your team, if you catch my drift.

dramonic · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:20 am

actually, they were a cult coupled with a bunch of serial killers.

Unvote
Vote: Ani

scared of L-2? Ridiculous <<

Head_Honcho · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:47 am

Looker wrote:
Nikanor wrote:
ani wrote:Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.
In your opinion, how bad is an L-2 vote in the RVS?
Not bad at all when you know who you're lynching is not on your team, if you catch my drift.

What specifically is your drift? I have no idea what you're implying here.

Snow_Bunny · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:16 am

I'm really sick, I'll read and post something after I feel better.

Locke Lamora · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 6:44 am

Slepz: what did you find unjustified about my vote?

People who don't pay attention: Yankee placed a random vote on page 3. He'd already posted once, that was contentless, then he stuck a humourous random vote on Dramonic. Doesn't strike me as someone looking for scum, he just wanted the RVS to keep going. I did say I thought he was doing that, if you read the post.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:54 am

Netlava wrote:
Because my vote would be the 4th on him. AKA L-2.
4th vote would be L-3. What caused you to think that a Looker vote would be appealing in the first place?

Because he voted me. It's my random reason.

animorpherv1 · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:55 am

dramonic wrote:actually, they were a cult coupled with a bunch of serial killers.

Unvote
Vote: Ani

scared of L-2? Ridiculous <<

In the RVS? I think it's a bit much.