Mini 854 - Dice Mafia (Over)

[Empking]

[2]Nachomamma8: (8) Mathcam, Matchcam, Matchcam, Mathcam, Lewarcher82, Lewarcher82, Lewarcher82, Lewarcher82
[2]le Chat: (1) Excridin
[4]Excedrin: (1) Le Chat
[4]lewarcher82: (4) Excridin, Excridin, le Chat, Nachomomma8, Excridin
[4]mathcam: (3) Lewarcher82, Nachomamma8
[4/4]Rosso Carne: (0)

11 to Lynch

The scum's day talking situation is not public knowledge.

[Rosso Carne]

uhm.

ill HAMMAH! nach tomorrow after a reread.

maybe

HAPPY BIRTHDAY CAM!

[Rosso Carne]

fuck it

vote: nach nach nach nach

HAMMAH!

[Empking]

You've heard of the sensation that's rocked the nation. The monster that's a nonster.

To put it simply. You've heard of the

Swarm!

Dun, dun, dun!

Nachomomma8 was lynched. He was a Swarm Of Aliens from the Planet Otteffs.

He was a vote increaser.

He was town.

[Empking]

le Chat

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (3) = 3

Excedrin

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (2) = 2

lewarcher82

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (1) = 1

mathcam

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (3) = 3

Rosso Carne

Original Roll String: 1d3

1 3-Sided Dice: (3) = 3

[Empking]

[1] le Chat (0)
[1] Excedrin (0)
[2]lewarcher82 (0)
[1]mathcam (0)
[2]Rosso Carne (0)

With seven votes it is four to lynch.

[Excedrin]

Well, that answered my question, I guess.

It seemed odd that lewarcher82 seemed hesitant to vote for his top suspect based on the idea that Rosso Carne would likely hammer. So I was looking for "Oh yea, well Rosso Carne always hammers, he's known for it, check the avatar etc."

Anyway that was a fast d1 and scum apparently doesn't have a kill. Today we have a similar situation as yesterday in that only 2 players are needed to lynch.

Vote: lewarcher82

Because I didn't like the way you jumped on the case against Nachomamma8, stated that you didn't want to let Rosso hammer, then did it anyway.

[lewarcher82]

@exce: fail. I am town.

I have fever tonite.... gonna post tomorrow or ask 4 replacement if it takes longer.

[mathcam]

Wow! Even though we lost a town, I have to say it's pretty exciting to be on day 2 on page 3.

I need to brainstorm for a bit.

Cam

[mathcam]

And thanks, Rosso!

[lewarcher82]

feeling better, no need to replace me.

I exitated voting nacho, it is true, but then i decided to do it. The reason is that he couldn't and wouldn't give any justification for the post I found scummy.

[le Chat]

hello everyone. my v/la was longer than i expected, and i have class within the hour, but i will be back for good today and post.

was surprised to see day 2. then i remembered quad rosso.

[Empking]

[1] le Chat (0)
[0/1] Excedrin (0)
[2]lewarcher82 (1): Excedrin
[1]mathcam (0)
[2]Rosso Carne (0)

4 to lynch.

[mathcam]

Emp: There should be a 1 after lewarcher. And it's Excedrin, not Excridin.

Let's take the worst-case scenario here -- Rosso and Lew are scum together. They have the voting majority, and could lynch someone whenever they want. In fact, they can take their time, since the other three of us can't do anything without at least of them. But of course, it's possible that they get screwed tomorrow with low votes, and so they can't just jump out and claim victory. All in all, this is pretty improbable, though.

I know I haven't played as much with Rosso as the rest of you probably have, but I'm feeling a little pro-Rosso at the moment. I guess by his reputation and/or title, I can presume he does this a lot, but it doesn't seem like a very likely hammah for a scum to pull.

Cam

[Excedrin]

Yea, I hadn't played with Rosso Carne either and I'm now in 2 games with him. So... surprising playstyle but I agree with mathcam's take on this.

@exce: fail. I am town.

I have fever tonite.... gonna post tomorrow or ask 4 replacement if it takes longer.

feeling better, no need to replace me.

I exitated voting nacho, it is true, but then i decided to do it. The reason is that he couldn't and wouldn't give any justification for the post I found scummy.

Glad that you're feeling better. Well, I guess you're town, so I should unvote.
He did give some justification (in post 40), he was trying to learn about the setup, to town's advantage. lewarcher82 ignored it and then voted anyway despite his expectation that Rosso Carne would hammer.

to: Nachomamma8

i was just saying I did not call you scummy.

Is this like, "his action was possibly scummy, but I'm not calling him scummy"? What's the point of splitting hairs here?

hello everyone. my v/la was longer than i expected, and i have class within the hour, but i will be back for good today and post.

was surprised to see day 2. then i remembered quad rosso.

Welcome to day 2, looking forward to your post.

[mathcam]

Welcome to day 2, looking forward to your post.

Also Rosso's.

Cam

[lewarcher82]

@Exce: my sentence about "not calling Nacho scummy" was not meant for him, but for us all, to show that he was overreacting to my words.

[le Chat]

It seemed odd that lewarcher82 seemed hesitant to vote for his top suspect based on the idea that Rosso Carne would likely hammer. So I was looking for "Oh yea, well Rosso Carne always hammers, he's known for it, check the avatar etc."

Vote: lewarcher82

Because I didn't like the way you jumped on the case against Nachomamma8, stated that you didn't want to let Rosso hammer, then did it anyway.

This is strong. I was recently scum in a small game and I lost because I had a deathly fear of hammering, because if I hammered on Day 1, I was afraid that I would be lynched for it on Day 2. Rosso Carne is known for hammering. I made that clear on Day 1 with that joke, plus, his custom title. In a circumstance like this, lewarcher's vote is basically a hammer vote as well, if he knows that Rosso Carne is going to vote to hammer, then he could have feared placing his vote and being responsible for a mislynch, once we looked past Rosso.

Seems like a nice gig Rosso has going. I dont think hes scummy for it because obviously he does it in every game. But I do think that what you point out here is lewarcher-scum being afraid of being attributed to a mislynch.

Anyway that was a fast d1 and scum apparently doesn't have a kill. Today we have a similar situation as yesterday in that only 2 players are needed to lynch.

I think there's only one scum in the game. Six players is pretty small to have two scum without some sort of mechanic like in Lovers mafia where if you lynch one scum you win even though theres two. In this game, the dice rolls allow for the possibility for the mafia to roll well and control the lynch earlier than they should be able to. In a situation like now, when only 2 players are needed to lynch, having 2 mafia would make the game very swingy.

Let's take the worst-case scenario here -- Rosso and Lew are scum together. They have the voting majority, and could lynch someone whenever they want. In fact, they can take their time, since the other three of us can't do anything without at least of them. But of course, it's possible that they get screwed tomorrow with low votes, and so they can't just jump out and claim victory. All in all, this is pretty improbable, though.

As I just said above, I don't think that would be the case. Game would be over in 1 day if scum got the vote majority now.

---

vote: lewarcher

lewarcher, do you think theres 1 scum? who do you think it is?

[lewarcher82]

I answered my behaviour about the Nacho thing, French cat. Also, I have no problems hammering.

I do not know who is scum, but i sure hope there is only 1...

I do a re read, but there is not much to read I am afraid.

[mathcam]

Yoohoo! Rosso! Rosso?

[lewarcher82]

you are voting the wrong dice, guys...

vote: le chat

[Rosso Carne]

meh, hi cam.

I would probably HAMMAH! now, but Im just not so sure.

cam, gimme a sign.

[lewarcher82]

do you guys realize how thin the case against me really is? do not lynch me. I am town.

[Empking]

[0/1] le Chat (2) Lewarcher82
[0/1] Excedrin (0)
[1/2]lewarcher82 (2): Excedrin, LeChat
[1]mathcam (0)
[2]Rosso Carne (0)

4 to lynch.

Lew: I only counted your vote as one. Was it meant to be two?

[lewarcher82]

I am sorry, I meant:

Unvote; Vote Le Chat, Le Chat

yes it was meant to be 2. My bad. Now it is clear I guess.