Mini 854 - Dice Mafia (Over)

Empking · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:09 pm

[2]Nachomamma8: (1) Mathcam
[2]le Chat: 0
[4]Excedrin: (3) Le Chat Lewarcher82, Mathcam
[4]lewarcher82: (4) Excridin, Excridin, le Chat, Mathcam
[4]mathcam: (2) Excridin, Lewarcher82
[4]Rosso Carne: (4) Excridin, Lewarcher82, Lewarcher82, Mathcam

11 to Lynch

lewarcher82 · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:20 am

well, this is my first nightless game... I assume we cannot hope to find clues about mafia activity, so now we have 2 players leading at L-7... I guess we should talk a little more, unless we want this game to be completly random...

mathcam · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:56 am

Yeah, well, we still have two members AWOL (Nacho and Rosso), and now Le Chat's away for a couple of days. We can barely get a lynch, let alone have a stimulating discussion, with three of us here.

Maybe we could get some prods/replacements, Emp?

Cam

lewarcher82 · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:15 am

Yeah:

Mod, please, prod them or replace

Empking · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:23 am

Nacho is on V/LA till Tuesday (?)

I'll prod Rosso.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:36 pm

I've been V/LA since Tuesday... sorry about the confusion.

Anyways, I'm going to hold onto my votes until I find someone worth being suspicious of. Looks like those who have more votes have more voice, and more opportunity to throw around votes like FoSes. Oh, and

Mod? Can scum talk during the day, or are they forbidden to talk at all?

Vote: Mathcam, lewarcher82

Because he suggested replacing me so early in the game...

mathcam · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:27 pm

For some reason, I find that mod question pretty scummy. Kind of feels like you know the answer and are trying to gain some pro-town points by feigning ignorance.

Also, interesting that you claim that you're going to hold onto your votes, and then cast all of them anyway. It's as if he wrote the first half of the post, got distracted coming up with his "feigning ignorance" plan above, and then wrote the second half of this post having forgot what the first half said.

It's a lot of thoughts to put in someone's head, but it's by far the most compelling lead so far.

Unvote: Everyone, Vote x 4: Nachomamma

.

Cam

lewarcher82 · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:21 pm

mathcam wrote:For some reason, I find that mod question pretty scummy. Kind of feels like you know the answer and are trying to gain some pro-town points by feigning ignorance.

Also, interesting that you claim that you're going to hold onto your votes, and then cast all of them anyway. It's as if he wrote the first half of the post, got distracted coming up with his "feigning ignorance" plan above, and then wrote the second half of this post having forgot what the first half said.

It's a lot of thoughts to put in someone's head, but it's by far the most compelling lead so far.

Unvote: Everyone, Vote x 4: Nachomamma
.

Cam

Well, I have the same feeling, Nacho. I do not change all my votes to you, for now (it would be virtually L-Rosso and Rosso would prolly hammer), but please answer.

Rosso Carne · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:07 am

uhm. how many is it to lynch?

lewarcher82 · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:09 am

11, dude, and u count as 4

mathcam · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:27 am

Note quite the game-buster I was hoping for from Rosso...

Rosso Carne · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:31 am

mathcam wrote:Note quite the game-buster I was hoping for from Rosso...

lol die in a fire

Rosso Carne · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:32 am

oh and for all intents and purposes, i was arrested in the G20 riots.

Empking · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:04 am

[2]Nachomamma8: (4) Mathcam, Matchcam, Matchcam, Mathcam
[2]le Chat: 0
[4]Excedrin: (3) Le Chat Lewarcher82, Mathcam
[4]lewarcher82: (4) Excridin, Excridin, le Chat, Nachomomma8
[4]mathcam: (3) Excridin, Lewarcher82, Nachomamma8
[4/4]Rosso Carne: (4) Excridin, Lewarcher82, Lewarcher82, Mathcam

11 to Lynch

The scum's day talking situation is not public knowledge.

lewarcher82 · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:05 am

Nacho, I have two questions. We are 6 and there are no nights.

1) how do you know if there is more than one mafia?

2) even assuming that there is more than one, it is evident that they can pm each other... how could they communicate otherwise? So why did you ask if not to look town-sided?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:07 am

1) I don't. Which would be why I asked that question... If the scum can talk at day, it's safe to assume there is more than one.

2) Do the scum have to communicate? I didn't read that anywhere in the rules... Explained why I aked above.

As for the contridiction, I simply changed my mind. I'll have to admit, I didn't put much thought into that post... I just wanted to put down a post that showed I was here, rather than "I'll post something later".

lewarcher82 · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:42 am

Nachomamma8 wrote:1) I don't. Which would be why I asked that question... If the scum can talk at day, it's safe to assume there is more than one.

2) Do the scum have to communicate? I didn't read that anywhere in the rules... Explained why I aked above.

As for the contridiction, I simply changed my mind. I'll have to admit, I didn't put much thought into that post... I just wanted to put down a post that showed I was here, rather than "I'll post something later".

It is not enough to call you scummy, but surely this post is not better than the previous one. At least to me.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:52 am

Why not? I can't explain my scummy appearance if you don't explain why it's scummy. I can't get into your mind...

lewarcher82 · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:58 am

Nachomamma8 wrote:Why not? I can't explain my scummy appearance if you don't explain why it's scummy. I can't get into your mind...

lewarcher82 wrote:It is not enough to call you scummy

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:03 am

It is not enough to call you scummy... but surely this post is not much better than the last one. At least to me.

Why isn't it better?

lewarcher82 · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:07 am

i was just saying I did not call you scummy. But it is a fact that your question to mod may be a way to look town-aligned. And your answer "I didn't think much about what I was writing" is not a good answer to me. It is hardly an answer

Excedrin · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:51 am

It seems reasonable to ask questions about the fact that it's nightless. I didn't even know it was nightless until after mathcam mentioned it (I missed it in the queue, probably because I was more interested in the multiple votes mechanic). Asking about it to appear town seems like a stretch, but why else would someone ask that? As town, maybe he's just curious? Maybe he's unfamiliar with typical nightless games? Maybe he wanted to attempt to learn something about the setup:

Nachomamma8 wrote: 1) I don't. Which would be why I asked that question... If the scum can talk at day, it's safe to assume there is more than one.

Even if Empking had answered this publicly, it wouldn't reveal anything about the setup since 1 scum (who can daytalk... with himself) or 2 scum or 2 unaligned scum is possible.

lewarcher82 wrote:Well, I have the same feeling, Nacho. I do not change all my votes to you, for now (it would be virtually L-Rosso and Rosso would prolly hammer), but please answer.

Is there something I should know here?

Vote: lewarcher82, lewarcher82, lewarcher82, le Chat

mathcam · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:11 pm

I don't get that last question for archer, excedrin. What are you seeing?

Excedrin · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:19 pm

I'd rather explain after he responds (obviously I'll clarify if that's necessary).

lewarcher82 · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:11 pm

I would answer Excedrin if I understood what he is asking.

Oh, and my point is not "it is scummy to ask publicly"

my point is that Nacho was prolly trying to make us think "oh, look, he does not know, so he is prolly town".

and the answer "oh, well, I didn't mean anything particular in my post" is not a good answer. This is my point.

I sure hope you will clarify. Nacho is getting defended, evidently.

Reformulate your question. For the time being I will switch to Nacho.

Unvote: everyone. Vote Nachomamma8, Nachomamma8, Nachomamma8, Nachomamma8