Mini 851 - Bloodlust Mafia! - Game Over


User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #375 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:25 pm

Post by Peabody »

Sorry, I don't know what AtE is. My bad.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #376 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:25 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

Peabody wrote:Well then, there's not much I can do to defend myself. If someone wants to be constructive and ask me questions, I would rather that happen. What I'm seeing right now is
you are obviously scum, so I'm closing my ears to everything you say
. Several people did mention my misrepresentation could be a mistake. Now all of a sudden, I can't get a benefit of the doubt?

Also my defense is not WIFOM. Mafia would have NOTHING to gain by doing what I did unless they want to lose the game. If it is WIFOM, I honestly believe this claim MUST be considered.

I'm amused by how fast certain people jumped on my bandwagon.
Who are you referring to being scum?
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #377 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:26 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

Peabody wrote:Sorry, I don't know what AtE is. My bad.
Shorthand for appeal to emotion.
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #378 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:28 pm

Post by Rosso Carne »

Looker wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:mmhm. would HAMMAH! looker
I'm guessing you'd HAMMAH! anyone right now to get out of the hotseat, am I right?
Peabody wrote:
Looker wrote:I have been playing completely idiotically and yet votes are just automatically deflecting themselves from me.
Looker wrote:On top of that, I don't see how my play sucks
Contradiction.
Whoa, playboy, that's a big fat
vote peabody
for taking somebody else's post and slapping my name on it. That first one I mean. I think that was almaster's post.
Peabody wrote:
Alamaster wrote:. I have been playing completely idiotically and yet votes are just automatically deflecting themselves from me.
Do you want us to vote you?
Yeah, remember him? That was his shit.
no, i woudlnt HAMMAH! anyone.

and I'm hardley int he hotseat.
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #379 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:28 pm

Post by Peabody »

Oh, I wouldn't say it was much of an appeal to emotion. I would say it was an appeal to reason.
CB wrote: which people are you amused by?
Pomegranate, actually. Earlier in the game I suspected her, but I hardly got to crossexamine her yet. I need to do this soon.
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #380 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:33 pm

Post by Rosso Carne »

really dont like this wagon on peabody.

it was started over something very very minor, this ought to go nowhere. The fact that looker and co found this to be so scummy to push pb to a lynch is really telling.

noted.
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #381 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:40 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

Rosso Carne wrote:really dont like this wagon on peabody.

it was started over something very very minor, this ought to go nowhere. The fact that looker and co found this to be so scummy to push pb to a lynch is really telling.

noted.
Attempt to actively derail wagon is noted.

An explanation of why it's minor would probably carry more weight than just saying it is.
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #382 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:49 pm

Post by Peabody »

Zachrulez wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:really dont like this wagon on peabody.

it was started over something very very minor, this ought to go nowhere. The fact that looker and co found this to be so scummy to push pb to a lynch is really telling.

noted.
Attempt to actively derail wagon is noted.

An explanation of why it's minor would probably carry more weight than just saying it is.
I manually type out the people's name I quote, so its easy to accidentally get someone confused in my posting. When I read looker's post when he said that his playstyle wasn't bad, I immediately connected it with what Alamaster said earlier and went back to find that quote with the ctrl+F function. I honestly thought Looker said both of those things. I wasn't thinking.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #383 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:09 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

Did you manually type out the names you quoted in post 382?
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #384 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:13 pm

Post by Peabody »

Pom wrote:I usually do a bit of lurking D1 to get into the feel of the game, but I'll try to get some content in after school tomorrow
Pom wrote:On a separate lurking note, sometimes (if everypne's playing really well) the lurkers are the most detrimental people apparent to the town.
Um.....
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #385 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:13 pm

Post by Peabody »

Zachrulez wrote:Did you manually type out the names you quoted in post 382?
No, not that time.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #386 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:16 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

She's not lurking.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #387 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:18 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

Peabody wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:Did you manually type out the names you quoted in post 382?
No, not that time.
Then you learn fast. :D

Your misrep isn't the only point against you.
Zachrulez wrote:
Peabody wrote:
RayFrost wrote:hmmm...

Well, I'm not seeing discussion go anywhere...

gah, this is why I prefer replacing in >.<

vote: almasterGM


cuz a bandwagon starts discussion!
Sooo why didn't you just join a bandwagon that's already in place? Chibo looks like a great bandwagon right now.
What makes a Chibo wagon better than an Almaster wagon?

I don't get why you're trying to redirect Ray's vote.
I also find that scummy.
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #388 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:19 pm

Post by Rosso Carne »

Zachrulez wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:really dont like this wagon on peabody.

it was started over something very very minor, this ought to go nowhere. The fact that looker and co found this to be so scummy to push pb to a lynch is really telling.

noted.
Attempt to actively derail wagon is noted.

An explanation of why it's minor would probably carry more weight than just saying it is.
Die in a flood.
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
Peabody
Peabody
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Peabody
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1655
Joined: July 17, 2009

Post Post #389 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:22 pm

Post by Peabody »

Zachrulez wrote:She's not lurking.
That's not my point. She contradicted herself. Its just something I just noticed. I plan on typing out a post explaining my reasoning on Pomegranate, but obviously I'm not sure on her or else I would have voted.

By the way, Zach, I think you are trying to make the second point against me something that it is not. You make me out to be someone who is attempting to control people's votes when in reality I am not doing this.
User avatar
Zachrulez
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Zachrulez
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8551
Joined: December 5, 2008
Location: Minnesota

Post Post #390 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Zachrulez »

My 2nd point was more about the fact that you were trying to direct Ray to one bandwagon over another.
User avatar
ChiboSempai
ChiboSempai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ChiboSempai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 321
Joined: September 14, 2009

Post Post #391 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:39 pm

Post by ChiboSempai »

I don't buy Peabody's mistake. How was it not trying to frame Looker? If it was a typo and he meant to type Alamaster, then I don't see how he would be using an Alamaster quote to find a contradiction in Looker.

Peabody's first reply after people called out his mistake was that he misread the name. I find it hard to go back to a post, find it, and see the name as Looker instead of Alamaster, they are completely different. Not to mention he even quoted that Alamaster post before about 36 hours ago and had typed Alamaster in his quote box:
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 19#1872919

I don't see how he knew back then it was Alamaster, but all of a sudden now thought it was Looker. It makes no sense.

Unvote

Vote: Peabody


that puts him to 6 btw
Show
join game

lynch town

win
I'm here from [url=http://www.smashboards.com/member.php?u=72031]Smash World Forums[/url]
User avatar
AlmasterGM
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmasterGM
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4471
Joined: May 29, 2009

Post Post #392 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:51 pm

Post by AlmasterGM »

I'm tired of Day 1. It's tl;dr

Unvote. Vote: Peabody.


RAWR! GO HAMMAR GO!
User avatar
ChiboSempai
ChiboSempai
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ChiboSempai
Goon
Goon
Posts: 321
Joined: September 14, 2009

Post Post #393 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:54 pm

Post by ChiboSempai »

lol Rosso didn't even get his hammah
Show
join game

lynch town

win
I'm here from [url=http://www.smashboards.com/member.php?u=72031]Smash World Forums[/url]
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #394 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:57 pm

Post by Looker »

RayFrost wrote:
Looker wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:mmhm. would HAMMAH! looker
I'm guessing you'd HAMMAH! anyone right now to get out of the hotseat, am I right?
Looker, you know that Rosso will only HAMMAH! people, so saying you'll wait until he votes is saying "during D2/Twilight." I expect that post you promised within the next couple of days, rl time. Stalling isn't helpful for town.
I
promised? I thought Haylen promised a post but she lost it. You sure it was me?

And then you say this...
RayFrost wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
RayFrost wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
Unvote: Vote: Peabody


Do you often misrepresent people so blatently?
Do you often vote people for one instance of misrepresentation without waiting for an explanation?
Any thoughts on that misrep by the way?

It's really bad, especially because he responded to the person who actually typed the quote he tried to use against Looker. Are you liable to believe that it was really some kind of mistake on Peabody's part?
I find it to be worth looking into, but not something to arbitrarily vote over.

I think it
is
a possibility that he did. I want to wait for his response before hounding him.
Is this some kind of trick? Are you and Mr. Peabody on teams?

And as far as Mr. Peabody's Post 371
Peabody wrote:Well then, there's not much I can do to defend myself. If someone wants to be constructive and ask me questions, I would rather that happen. What I'm seeing right now is
you are obviously scum, so I'm closing my ears to everything you say
. Several people did mention my misrepresentation could be a mistake. Now all of a sudden, I can't get a benefit of the doubt?

Also my defense is not WIFOM. Mafia would have NOTHING to gain by doing what I did unless they want to lose the game. If it is WIFOM, I honestly believe this claim MUST be considered.

I'm amused by how fast certain people jumped on my bandwagon.
They're listening, they just don't believe you.

Rosso's Post 378 - I know, I just like saying HAMMAH!, it makes me smile on the inside. I'm kind of bloodthirsty...hmm...

Rosso's Post 380 - And here I was thinking you were cool, but all you do is "note" stuff. Can you explain to me how I pushed "pb" to a lynch, please? It's not so much I hate your opinion, it's just that you're not sounding rational, only snippy.
Rosso Carne wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:really dont like this wagon on peabody.

it was started over something very very minor, this ought to go nowhere. The fact that looker and co found this to be so scummy to push pb to a lynch is really telling.

noted.
Attempt to actively derail wagon is noted.

An explanation of why it's minor would probably carry more weight than just saying it is.
Die in a flood.
FoS Rosso
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #395 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:58 pm

Post by Looker »

Ah...awwww...
User avatar
RayFrost
RayFrost
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
RayFrost
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10769
Joined: August 2, 2009
Location: Japan

Post Post #396 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:02 pm

Post by RayFrost »

Looker wrote:
RayFrost wrote:
Looker wrote:
Rosso Carne wrote:mmhm. would HAMMAH! looker
I'm guessing you'd HAMMAH! anyone right now to get out of the hotseat, am I right?
Looker, you know that Rosso will only HAMMAH! people, so saying you'll wait until he votes is saying "during D2/Twilight." I expect that post you promised within the next couple of days, rl time. Stalling isn't helpful for town.
I
promised? I thought Haylen promised a post but she lost it. You sure it was me?

And then you say this...
RayFrost wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
RayFrost wrote:
Zachrulez wrote:
Unvote: Vote: Peabody


Do you often misrepresent people so blatently?
Do you often vote people for one instance of misrepresentation without waiting for an explanation?
Any thoughts on that misrep by the way?

It's really bad, especially because he responded to the person who actually typed the quote he tried to use against Looker. Are you liable to believe that it was really some kind of mistake on Peabody's part?
I find it to be worth looking into, but not something to arbitrarily vote over.

I think it
is
a possibility that he did. I want to wait for his response before hounding him.
Is this some kind of trick? Are you and Mr. Peabody on teams?
You said you have a post on the way.

Also, I was saying I'd rather wait for Peabody's RESPONSE than just rush it. Y'know, holding off to see if he has a good explanation or not.
don't you feel silly now?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #397 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:29 pm

Post by Looker »

No I was saying because I went back and didn't see where I said that I had a post on the way.

The gist of it is it looked like you were doing the same thing peabody was doing as if to cast it in a common light. It looked like you were sticking up for him, if in a surreptitious way.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #398 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:30 pm

Post by Looker »

But either way, your vote was on him, too, so I won't feel that bad. I voted him because he crossed me. You, on the other hand, why, you're just opportunistic scum.
User avatar
RayFrost
RayFrost
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
RayFrost
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10769
Joined: August 2, 2009
Location: Japan

Post Post #399 (ISO) » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:34 pm

Post by RayFrost »

Looker wrote:But either way, your vote was on him, too, so I won't feel that bad. I voted him because he crossed me. You, on the other hand, why, you're just opportunistic scum.
And where do you get the idea that I'm scum, again? It seems to match that you'd find me scum for no real reason... and saying you got rid of peabody

because he crossed you
shows a very mafia-esque mindset... kill all those that oppose you.
don't you feel silly now?

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”