Open 169 - [Alternating 9P] OVER

Lynx The Antithesis · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:53 pm

RayFrost wrote:
Lynx The Antithesis wrote:
It obviously did considering you voted Khamisa in the very next post.
It didn't influence so much as her post afterward =/

She was pressured to put some content in and choose to instead do more fluff.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Unvote,Vote:Khamisa

More Khamisa pressure is good I feel

VOTE COUNT

(3) Khamisa - Deuxieme Octopus, RayFrost, Lynx The Antithesis

(1) CSL - Maemuki
(1) Lynx The Antithesis - dank
(1) Haylen - Haylen
(1) ReyFrost - Paradoxombie

Not Voting: CSL, Khamisa

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
DEADLINE: September 23, 2009 6:30 PM PST

Khamisa · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:09 am

Maybe it's only applicable to me, but I don't care about votes. We could pass around a million votes and nothing gets done; but one someone reaches five, there better be a good reason as to why that happened.

And supposedly I've been posting fluff. Give me something that I haven't noted already.

Tenchi · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:28 am

Welcome back,

Haylen

!

Deuxieme Octopus · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:02 pm

Khamisa wrote:Maybe it's only applicable to me, but I don't care about votes. We could pass around a million votes and nothing gets done; but one someone reaches five, there better be a good reason as to why that happened.

And supposedly I've been posting fluff. Give me something that I haven't noted already.

This has to be the single worst opinion I've ever read. You don't "pass around votes and nothing gets done." Each successive vote is a sign that the player receiving the votes is more and more obligated to take a stand and defend themselves. It LITERALLY is pressure. The more votes you allow to pile onto someone (eg: bandwagon) LITERALLY increases how pressured they are to respond. How can you argue this?

RayFrost · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:27 pm

Khamisa wrote:Maybe it's only applicable to me, but I don't care about votes. We could pass around a million votes and nothing gets done; but one someone reaches five, there better be a good reason as to why that happened.

And supposedly I've been posting fluff. Give me something that I haven't noted already.

IoA = information over analysis

IoA = fluff.

fluff = scummy

IoA = information over analysis = fluff = scummy

You have done IoA posts more than anything else. Thank you, have a nice day.

CSL · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:22 pm

Well, since RayFrost said IoA = Scum, and I hardly have any idea what to do...

Vote: Khamisa

RayFrost · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:24 pm

CSL wrote:Well, since RayFrost said IoA = Scum, and I hardly have any idea what to do...

Vote: Khamisa

Information over analysis = information without giving analysis

Obviously, you can give analysis & information and not be scummy.

Merely stating information already known without any views or opinions upon it is scummy.

y'gitme?

CSL · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:27 pm

Yea, I gityou.

I just hope we're right about the scum here.

That reminds me.

Khamisa, you are at L-1. Claim?

dank · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:28 pm

CSL: If you are not going to contribute anything, then get your L-1 vote off. Thanks.

Also, sometimes, its nice to contribute stuff.

dank · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:30 pm

Speaking of which, CSL, are you trying to lynch someone for posting fluff and not contributing, where you've done the exact same thing? Mighty sneaky of you.

Khamisa: no need for a claim here, but seriously, start posting content.

CSL:

unvote, vote: CSL

CSL · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:32 pm

Unvote

Haha, sorry. I'm just hyper and really weird all of a sudden.

RayFrost · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:35 pm

CSL wrote:
Unvote

Haha, sorry. I'm just hyper and really weird all of a sudden.

Disclaimer: I'm in the same game that he's in that is causing it, but I am not experiencing the same high as him.

dank · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:49 pm

Why are you so sure its the other game that's causing it?

RayFrost · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:42 pm

dank wrote:Why are you so sure its the other game that's causing it?

He pretty much said so in the other game.

Eh, doesn't explain away his lack of content.

dank · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 4:57 pm

It kinda of defends it, if you're putting a disclaimer to his poor gameplay.

RayFrost · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:00 pm

dank wrote:It kinda of defends it, if you're putting a disclaimer to his poor gameplay.

I was putting a disclaimer for myself >.>

I am not supporting his actions

I was putting the disclaimer to say "if he makes wild accusations towards me, it's cuz he's got a mental voodoo spell on him due to the interactions in another game" .-. Hopefully, he'll contain his jokingness to that game and not bring it in here as well.

dank · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:04 pm

Again, you are directly tying his behavior to something in another game, which is a point he himself did not make. Yes, the disclaimer can serve as a disclaimer for your own actions, but, you had not shown any actions related to that game yet.

In reality, the only thing that disclaimer did was explain his stupid/poor gameplay and tie it to what happened in another game. That, is pure defense of another player.

RayFrost · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:07 pm

dank wrote:Again, you are directly tying his behavior to something in another game, which is a point he himself did not make. Yes, the disclaimer can serve as a disclaimer for your own actions, but, you had not shown any actions related to that game yet.

In reality, the only thing that disclaimer did was explain his stupid/poor gameplay and tie it to what happened in another game. That, is pure defense of another player.

Then I guess I shouldn't have posted it.

Anyway, his time limit for that disclaimer being active was about 10 minutes if he was going to use it as a defense.

As it is, it would only possibly explain why he is tossing his vote at khamisa without any support for himself.

The lack of content is something that is his own fault and is inexcusable.

Lynx The Antithesis · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:29 pm

CSL wrote:Well, since RayFrost said IoA = Scum, and I hardly have any idea what to do...

Vote: Khamisa

This right here is way too hasty for an L-1 vote.

Unvote, Vote:CSL

I'm putting my vote back to its original place. You have no idea what to do so you just decide to jump on the largest current wagon? Excusing it with being hyper is just utterly ridiculous.

Deuxieme Octopus · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:56 am

CSL wrote:Well, since RayFrost said IoA = Scum, and I hardly have any idea what to do...

Vote: Khamisa

I know you've unvoted at this point, but were you aware that your vote put Khamisa at L-1??

Also, is this your first game? Why do you have "hardly...any idea what to do"??

Khamisa · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:05 am

Let's try again here.

What

exactly

have I been posting that makes it fluffy? I'm beginning to think that there really isn't anything and you are falsely accusing me.

I don't think this CSL's first game. At least, I know he's in another game with me ATM. Still, His vote is awful.

Haylen · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:24 am

wait? Im still voting myself? Wow.

unvote

Catching up, guys.

Anyone feel like giving me a summary of the cases? that always helps whether im replacing in or playing anyway...

CSL · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:22 am

Well, I made a stupid mistake, and suddenly, I'm the target again.

Haylen · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:40 am

Wait...am i in the right game?

RayFrost · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:34 pm

Haylen wrote:Wait...am i in the right game?

lmfao.

there is a case on khamisa:

posting fluff content, doing IoA, and overall not aiding town.

posts just recap on what have been said and contribute nothing to scum hunting.

there is suspicion of CSL:

he voted khamisa for no real reasons

said he doesn't know what to do

unvoted and said he did it cuz he was "hyper"

and this is probably his 5th game or so.