Deuxieme Octopus wrote:dank wrote:CSL stated distaste for a long RVS, what I feel is a town point of view
Not necessarily. Both town and scum players want the game to move into a phase where a lynch is both more likely and less reprehensible on an individual level. An RVS-lynch (hammer vote specifically) is an instant suspicion-magnet, something scum would never encourage.
Disliking long RVS's is a null-tell.
Butn at the same time, an RVS hammer (which mafia ordinarily would never do) + instant suspicion magnet the next day is about the best thing that could happen for scum, if its just a stupid townie that hammers. Thats why mafia wants RVS as long as possible, not only does it prevent town from doing anything that's really productive, but it allows the possibility for stupid mistakes that could seriously cost town the game (mislynch + lynch of the hammerer).
That's a specific case, but in general, I don't think it's helpful at all for town to keep RVS going, while it is perhaps the ideal situation for mafia at this point.
Anyway, yeah, saying you dislike rvs is a null tell. I just felt that its something that could be said for town points, especially if no action afterwards supports actually going out of it. Anyway, that's not at all my main point- questioning lynx's assertion that prolonging RVS isn't scummy.