Boost Mafia 2 (Game Over)

Ether · Post Post #2126 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:24 am

Were you talking to me?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #2127 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:38 am

Battle Mage · Post Post #2128 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:58 am

is this some kind of PR?

BM

Sajin · Post Post #2129 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:59 am

The ability to talk in one word posts? Meh.

I need Porochaz to respond to what I quoted. When you have a chance.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #2130 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:32 am

Prozac, in one hour, you can't read what you've missed and respond accordingly?

Patrick · Post Post #2131 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:46 am

Votecount

Porochaz (4) -- Shanba, Battle Mage, Sajin, Empking
Empking (4) -- Kmd4390, zwetschenwasser, cateraction, Ether

Not voting: Porochaz, Korejora
10 alive, 6 to lynch.

Boosting

Korejora (2) -- Ether, zwetschenwasser
cateraction (1) -- Kmd4390
Battle Mage (3) -- cateraction, Sajin, Empking
Ether (2) -- Korejora, Battle Mage

Korejora · Post Post #2132 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:18 pm

I keep reading the game and I keep coming up with nothing. The lynches just aren't informative because the first one was a newbie lynch, the second one was practically unanimous, the third was a policy lynch, and the fourth was a cop lynch. The boosts aren't informative because there's no player by player pattern in them. The only connections I'm seeing are between live players. It's like we're in day one again.

I don't really want to lynch Empking, because I don't see him with Porochaz, I don't think Sajin or Shanba are scum, and I don't think his scumbuddy would be voting him at this point. Porochaz is a worse lynch, though, since he's claimed a mostly confirmable role. *shrug* I suppose Empking could be with Battle Mage.

Do we think we can manage to boost someone with a compromise instead of a consensus?

Sajin · Post Post #2133 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:33 pm

There is a huge problem with porochaz's claim. I await an explanation.

I will boost BM or no one. I would perfer it to be BM, but I will compromise on no one.

Ether · Post Post #2134 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:49 pm

Sajin, it. can. wait. (Having said that, if someone's already tried to target Porochaz, it needs to speak up now.)

Will you finish your fucking claim already?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #2135 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:55 pm

On boost compromise:
Cateraction is my top choice. I can compromise on Kore or BM if absolutely needed.

Ether · Post Post #2136 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:59 pm

Pure curiosity: why not me?

(Feel free not to answer if it's not based on my play.)

Kmd4390 · Post Post #2137 (ISO) » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:04 pm

I do think you're town, but I'm more sure of Kore and BM. I wouldn't stand in the way of you being boosted. I just have other preferences.

Empking · Post Post #2138 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:48 am

Korejora wrote:
I keep reading the game and I keep coming up with nothing. The lynches just aren't informative because the first one was a newbie lynch, the second one was practically unanimous, the third was a policy lynch, and the fourth was a cop lynch. The boosts aren't informative because there's no player by player pattern in them. The only connections I'm seeing are between live players. It's like we're in day one again.

I don't really want to lynch Empking, because I don't see him with Porochaz, I don't think Sajin or Shanba are scum, and I don't think his scumbuddy would be voting him at this point. Porochaz is a worse lynch, though, since he's claimed a mostly confirmable role. *shrug* I suppose Empking could be with Battle Mage.

Do we think we can manage to boost someone with a compromise instead of a consensus?

Out of the three with the most number of boosts. I only find BM not likely scum, so no from me.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #2139 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:55 am

Me = compromise

Ether · Post Post #2140 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:52 am

unboost; boost: Battle Mage

Not great, but could be worse. Now someone please remind me why were we talking about boosts instead of Empking.

BM, I repeat: why are you still voting Porochaz?

Patrick · Post Post #2141 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:22 am

Since alot of people are only posting in response to prods, I'm knocking a week off the deadline. The new deadline is the 20th, one week from now. If activity picks up I'll consider putting the deadline back to where it was.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #2142 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:49 am

Unboost, Boost BM

B-1.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #2143 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:31 pm

Unboost; Boost: BM

Patrick · Post Post #2144 (ISO) » Sun Sep 13, 2009 1:33 pm

Votecount

Porochaz (4) -- Shanba, Battle Mage, Sajin, Empking
Empking (4) -- Kmd4390, zwetschenwasser, cateraction, Ether

Not voting: Porochaz, Korejora
10 alive, 6 to lynch.

Battle Mage has been boosted.

Ether · Post Post #2145 (ISO) » Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:33 am

So, uh. Deadline in a week, you know? The issues Sajin and BM are shamelessly ignoring are kind of important right now.

cateraction · Post Post #2146 (ISO) » Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:34 am

Why is everyone still voting Poro? I thought we kinda agreed we would let him live the night.

Ether · Post Post #2147 (ISO) » Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am

Cateraction, current List gogogo.

Empking · Post Post #2148 (ISO) » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:08 am

cateraction wrote:Why is everyone still voting Poro? I thought we kinda agreed we would let him live the night.

No. Some people decided that they personally would like him to live.

Battle Mage · Post Post #2149 (ISO) » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:28 am

Unvote, Vote: Zwet

I'd hammer Empking to avoid an NL, but Zwet is obvscum. I'm his top suspect, and yet he just boosted me. Inconsistency ftl!

BM