/in-vitational 3: Brass & Shrapnel. Over. before 831

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:01 am

I'm reluctant to poke around with the timing of the deadline seeing as the mod said it hit 12 hours late and included Budja in the vote count.

hasdgfas · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:41 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:Has, why is it you were going to vote for Has?

so are to talking

to

me or

about

me?

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:12 am

lol, you about Bud..sry

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:15 am

ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm reluctant to poke around with the timing of the deadline seeing as the mod said it hit 12 hours late and included Budja in the vote count.

it doesnt matter what the mod did after the vote..what matters is the mod stated the deadline was 6pm..Bud voted at 8pm...usually when a mod sets a deadline..that deadline doesnt change.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:28 am

I've seen plenty of people vote after the stated deadline but before the mod arrived just in case it helped as town. I've done it as town. I don't think it's scummy.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 7:03 am

you think that is the only reason I think he is scummy?

Budja · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:13 pm

Yes, I did know it was a couple of hours after deadline but I voted anyway, mainly to show my position on the lynch. I didn't know if my vote would be counted or not.

mole wrote:Need to reread, really not got a feel for this game at all.

Likewise.

Kublai Khan · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 4:12 pm

Budja wrote:
mole wrote:Need to reread, really not got a feel for this game at all.
Likewise.

This game feels like a game of minesweeper where you need that one breakthrough to happen so you can plant flags where the mines are.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:22 pm

curiouskarmadog wrote:you think that is the only reason I think he is scummy?

No, but my point is that I think the circumstances of his vote are enough reason to look elsewhere.

Not that I've figured out where else to look at or anything. >_>

molestargazer · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:07 am

First thing I noticed on the reread was KK's FoS which I pointed out in my Page 2 post here. He responded by accusing me of Dismissing in-game content, which I replied to here. Looking back, he never really replied to my original accusation of the fact that the P1 FoS was, really, covering his arse.

CKD's reaction to Budja's RVS vote seems a bit OTT - sure, it wasn't a good reason. But Post 48 basically looks like OMGUS.

KK's attacking of Quag in Post 58 looks reaching at best, could even be taken as chainsaw-y.
He also appears to not have responded to my request for an explanation as to how I misinterpreted him here. KK seems to be going out of his way to avoid answering anything.

Stopping here for now as MS has stopped loading...
Oh, wait, it's back.

@CKD

- I'm not seeing what the Budja case is. Could you please remind me?

I'm happy to

Vote: Kublai Khan

as I did yesterday.
Sure, it's not a great case. You might even think it OMGUSsy. But it's all I could find right now. Here's hoping this can be the breakthrough that makes this game interesting.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:11 am

Mole, want make you think that Bud's vote was random? Why didnt you say I was OTT yesterday?

molestargazer · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:00 am

Mole, want make you think that Bud's vote was random?

?

Why didnt you say I was OTT yesterday?

Because I didn't notice it yesterday.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:34 am

molestargazer wrote: CKD's reaction to Budja's RVS vote

same question...what makes you think his vote on me was random?

also, there is only 8 pages in this game..how did you miss it?

Budja · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:00 pm

For clarification, none of my votes were really random.

Korts · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:58 am

Pfft. Morning will end 24 hours late, at 6 PM

today

. School is distracting.

molestargazer · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:25 am

CKD wrote:same question...what makes you think his vote on me was random?

Apologies - it's not an RVS vote at all. Same point applies however, I still think it was an overreaction.

CKD wrote:also, there is only 8 pages in this game..how did you miss it?

By not reading the game properly, because of lack of interest. Which is why this whole catchup was needed in the first place.

Kublai Khan · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 3:22 am

molestargazer wrote:First thing I noticed on the reread was KK's FoS which I pointed out in my Page 2 post here. He responded by accusing me of Dismissing in-game content, which I replied to here. Looking back, he never really replied to my original accusation of the fact that the P1 FoS was, really, covering his arse.

I guess I never replied because I didn't understand the accusation. Doesn't an accusation of covering my arse imply that I made some sort of mistake to begin with? What was it? Not FOSing hasdgfas immediately?

I voted ChannelDelibird because I perceived that he overreacted to curiouskarmadog's joke-vote. Budja asked "what about hasdgfas?" since he had also voted for curiouskarmadog at which point I said "Okay fine" and FOSed hasdgfas. I had been planning to question hasdgfas after ChannelDelibird but I wanted to get ChannelDelibird's reason first because he's one of the very few that I hadn't played with yet. It's you and MacavityLock that are making a "ZOMG! SINISTER!" reaction to nothing, really.

molestargazer wrote:KK's attacking of Quag in Post 58 looks reaching at best, could even be taken as chainsaw-y.

I make no apologies for thinking that Quagmire was scum. It sucks that I was wrong, but he made no attempt to try to look town.

Though it's funny that you now think that my case was "reaching and chainsaw-y". Especially since you didn't have a problem piggy-backing on my Quagmire case with no added insight. That's the sort of 180° move that gets you invited to the X-Games.

molestargazer wrote:He also appears to not have responded to my request for an explanation as to how I misinterpreted him here. KK seems to be going out of his way to avoid answering anything.

Sorry, I missed your post while replying to MacavityLock. Check the timestamps it was a near-simulpost.

For an explanation as to how you've misinterpreted the tone of my posts, here is you misinterpreting the tone of my posts:

molestargazer (61) wrote:Whilst you may have counted the discussion as 'serious', to me it was your first post and it was still RVS.

In fact, if you look back to the post where I accuse you of misinterpreting the tone of my posts, I'm quoting the exact same passage.

molestargazer wrote:I'm happy to
Vote: Kublai Khan
as I did yesterday.
Sure, it's not a great case. You might even think it OMGUSsy. But it's all I could find right now. Here's hoping this can be the breakthrough that makes this game interesting.

How the hell is it "OMGUSsy"? After I missed your last post I didn't even address you for the rest of Day 1 or any at all of Day 2? And your case isn't merely "not great", it's really weak. Either I had already responded to it, or you're asking me to clarify something that I already was pretty clear about when I posted about it the first time. I don't remember you being such an obtuse player. What's the deal?

molestargazer · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:22 am

KK wrote:I guess I never replied because I didn't understand the accusation. Doesn't an accusation of covering my arse imply that I made some sort of mistake to begin with? What was it? Not FOSing hasdgfas immediately?

It's the fact that you FoSed only after being called out on it.

KK wrote:Though it's funny that you now think that my case was "reaching and chainsaw-y". Especially since you didn't have a problem piggy-backing on my Quagmire case with no added insight. That's the sort of 180° move that gets you invited to the X-Games.

1. X-Games?
2. I asked Quag questions about his 'case' because I didn't see his logic. I found his lack of one scummy. I didn't just use your case to 'hop-on' to the wagon. What made you think that?

KK wrote:Sorry, I missed your post while replying to MacavityLock. Check the timestamps it was a near-simulpost.

Understood.

KK wrote:How the hell is it "OMGUSsy"? After I missed your last post I didn't even address you for the rest of Day 1 or any at all of Day 2?

Purely due to the "misinterpretation" and "dismiss in-game content" scenario that went on between us in D1.

KK wrote:And your case isn't merely "not great", it's really weak. Either I had already responded to it, or you're asking me to clarify something that I already was pretty clear about when I posted about it the first time.

The misinterpretation thing I admit was already clarified. That's my bad.
Yes, it's a weak case.

KK wrote:I don't remember you being such an obtuse player. What's the deal?

molestargazer wrote:But it's all I could find right now. Here's hoping this can be the breakthrough that makes this game interesting.

ChannelDelibird · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:36 am

I'm returning to the UK on Thursday and will be busy tomorrow packing for said trip and Friday sorting out moving in to my student house, so consider me V/LA from now until Saturday.

Budja · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:14 pm

Ok, ok, reading back I found this post on page 2.

CKD wrote: unvote looks like he is actually trying to get conversation started. Has, do you usually attack obvious joke votes during RVS, or is this a change in play style..if so why?

This was just before my initial CKD vote and drama. So I guess I have to accept that I am wrong here. Still I don't my actual reasoning (assuming this post didn't exist) was as poor as suggested.

Quagmire did still stick out as moderately scummy (quite high in comparison as most reads are null) so I don't know how much can be gained by looking at his wagon.

Still having trouble getting reads. Kublia's early game wasn't great, I dislike has's intent to vote me without explanation (maybe a little OMGUS). Nothing much else is standing out.

MacavityLock · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:41 pm

I owe this game some serious consideration. My gut instinct is telling me to keep in on Kublai, but I need to dig in.

Korts · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:09 pm

Morning ends. Nothing happens.

Expect a vote count and activity check later.

Korts · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:46 pm

Vote Count

(1) Kublai Khan- molestargazer

not voting:

Budja, ChannelDelibird, curiouskarmadog, hascow, Kublai Khan, MacavityLock, Porochaz

5 to lynch

Deadline is September 23rd 6 PM EST.

hasdgfas will be prodded; Porochaz's V/LA is noted.

hasdgfas · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:23 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:lol, you about Bud..sry

thought I answered this, guess not

mostly it's because I've been getting bad vibes from him

Kublai Khan · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:34 am

molestargazer wrote:It's the fact that you FoSed only after being called out on it.

Eh, If I hadn't, then I'd be accused of hypocrisy. Damned if I do, damned if I don't.

molestargazer wrote:
KK wrote:Though it's funny that you now think that my case was "reaching and chainsaw-y". Especially since you didn't have a problem piggy-backing on my Quagmire case with no added insight. That's the sort of 180° move that gets you invited to the X-Games.
1. X-Games?
2. I asked Quag questions about his 'case' because I didn't see his logic. I found his lack of one scummy. I didn't just use your case to 'hop-on' to the wagon. What made you think that?

1. X-Games is a sports competition where skateboards and other "extreme" athletes compete. Turning 180° is a common move.
2. When you made your case against Quagmire (post 147), you linked back to post 117 where you note that my observation of Quagmire's "wishy-washy playing both sides of the fence" is valid. Then you note that his hasdgfas case has no merit, which I had already questioned him on.

Now you're accusing me of being reaching and chainsaw-y because it lynched an innocent townie.

vote: molestargazer

To the rest of the town: Anyone going to comment on this? Anyone still playing? Bueller?