YamiJoey wrote:Yeah; I got that post in the Night and realised that today was going to be painful after it.
Before you hammer, you should read the whole day. Oh well.
I know that this won't prove me as a Townie; but if I were Mafia; I'd've hit Webz last night. I know that people will just say "Yeah; but if you're Mafia you're not going to tell us the truth in anything", but w/e.
I think scum didn't want to lynch me
because
I'm the obvious choice. That leaves no room for nightkill reasoning speculation against other people, and if we have a doc, it was probably quite likely that I would be protected. Not to sound big-headed or anything.
. However, tonight they're not necessarily going to do a similar thing.
On Kirbyoshi; the only person I actually think is Mafia on here right now:
He starts in the scummy way of 'random voting' for a player who voted for him.
He FoS' me for no reason. (He did explain later, but at the time there was none.)
Exagerating on how many votes he had. I think this might've been a way to make people calm down on him in case there was an "accidental lynch" sort of situation, where people were so blinded by wanting to lynch someone; they made the evidence fit themselves. (Don't know myself if this is Townie/Scummy, but it raises questions for sure.)
The fact that he 'called me out' on 'helping Mafia'. IMO giving out what Mafia would/should be doing helps the Town more than Mafia. Mafia can night-talk, so they can keep things a secret.
Random voting is not a strong scumtell. As is pretty obvious by the fact that AA flipped town.
And what do you think about kirb vs HP? Is this a scumtell? I know you did in the quote below, but not that adequately. Do you think that testing HP was the only reason for this?
Having a case for anything they think is a scumtell is not a scumtell. Though being self-defensive can be. You're defending yourself here though, too.
I know I'm under suspicion; so anything that I say about him pushing me as scum won't seem like a scum thing, but he was pushing it all through yesterday. It was like he was looking for someone (Webs, HP, then me) to exploit and then when he got to me it was successful. He also took back his 'Threat to vote HP' and made sure it was known. Even before HP was killed that was hella-scummy to me.
HP being killed does make it a little obvious, but it could very well be a double bluff on Kirbyoshi's part. He does seem like he knows what he's talking about, even just a tad.
A very interesting point. Kirby did seem as if he was pushing to find a weak person through not very serious. This is very interesting, as he seems to only step up his case on you after seeing that you're not acting that strongly. However, you did the same thing, or it could have been seen as the same thing, with your weak FOSs at me and AA. You didn't, however, have as much success as he had. Though you did throw a lot of the evidence away when you made that hammer, so Kirb wasn't actually responsible for starting the case against you.
@ people with the most experience: What's your experience with such WIFOMs? Would newbs take such a risk of being guessed correctly very often? Or does this essentially clear kirby? Or is it a null-tell either way? (I'm not asking anyone personally, because a single scummy response could knock town.)
I also think that HP may have been lynched for playing as if he's a cop. Not strongly, but slightly. I believe his strong defensive positions might have been interpreted as such. More than anyone else, I think. Though, obviously, he wasn't.
Also, I would like to see if we can get a consensus not to post who we think is acting the towniest. We want as much room for error in the scumteam as possible. If you're going to say that you think someone's town, then do it by more subtle means or group people together, etc.
Also, we shouldn't be using only day 1 evidence to lynch people. This could leave scum, if they're, say, Yabba, Devotress, Me or Fallen Angel, in a great position to sit back while the people who acted strange in day 1 get lynched one by one.