Open 164 - Bird 7P (Over) before 836

[VP Baltar]

This is what bothers me, I don't think your questions were any more practical for moving the game forward than anyone else's, and yet you tried to classify them as such.

[zwetschenwasser]

Lots of newbies do that at first. I've seen that in a game I IC'd in (can't link, sorry). If bn isn't an alt, I'd consider it a nulltell.

[VP Baltar]

Either way, there is plenty on him. Hohum is begging for a lurker lynch though. I hate to do it, but in a 7 player game, lurking is a serious sin.

[hiphop]

It was the RVS. Not much to go on in the first 3 pages. If I have to nitpick to scumhunt, I will, which is what I did. Instead of acting like retarded like zwet and asking stupid questions like hiphop, I did something that moved the discussion forward.

I asked stupid questions? How so? I thought Zwet said I gave stupid answers. The only reason I gave stupid answers because I dislike people who don't answer questions, even if they are stupid questions.

Either way, there is plenty on him. Hohum is begging for a lurker lynch though. I hate to do it, but in a 7 player game, lurking is a serious sin.

I am torn both ways. He hasn’t given any scumtells, yet he lurks. I don’t want to attack someone who hasn’t given scumtells. I would rather attack scum.

[PorkchopExpress]

This is what bothers me, I don't think your questions were any more practical for moving the game forward than anyone else's, and yet you tried to classify them as such.

This is a fair point. You can't shut down other people for making mountain's out of mole hills that you happen to disagree with, and then excuse your own questionable nitpicking because it moved the discussion forward. It should be worthwhile, or it shouldn't.

[zwetschenwasser]

I say we lynch bn today and pressure hohum's replacement tomorrow.

[PorkchopExpress]

I'm a little concerned by the way that hohum turned discussion bn's way then disappears, only to have a case against bn presented by VP in his absence. That could be coordinated play.

[VP Baltar]

That's quite the conjencture Porkchop considering I just said I'm fine with lynching him if he continues to lurk and that is where my vote is. What about that makes you think I'm partners with hohum?

Also, do you think the case on bn seems falsified or exaggerated in any way?

[zwetschenwasser]

Porkchop is making a major stretch here.

[hohum]

I'm here. I'm rereading the topic now. thoughts to come

[zwetschenwasser]

oh god.

Request forced replacement of hohum

[Far_Cry]

Either way, there is plenty on him. Hohum is begging for a lurker lynch though. I hate to do it, but in a 7 player game, lurking is a serious sin.

I agree, but town can't have a mislynch.

I say we lynch bn today and pressure hohum's replacement tomorrow.

This kind of play style really annoys me. You are simply going for utility lynches. You just think, "Lets lynch bn today just because." Alright, I have to say I didn't like bn's play thus far, but that doesn't mean we should lynch him without reason. Your strategy at the very least is antitown, but you can also consider that scummy. For that, I

FoS zwetschenwasser

[VP Baltar]

I agree, but town can't have a mislynch.

So what do you propose is the best course of action? Do lurkers get a free pass from you because town can't have a mislynch?

[zwetschenwasser]

uh, farcry, your logic is the opposite of the truth. There's a large case presented on brothernature, and only utility cases on hohum.

[Far_Cry]

uh, farcry, your logic is the opposite of the truth. There's a large case presented on brothernature, and only utility cases on hohum.

You believe that we should lynch brothernature for "information." I believe that this is wrong.

I agree, but town can't have a mislynch.

So what do you propose is the best course of action? Do lurkers get a free pass from you because town can't have a mislynch?

No. Lurkers still need to be observed. What I'm saying is that town needs to be careful, and only to lynch lurkers after they are absolutely sure it is done with scummy intentions.

[zwetschenwasser]

I never said that we should lynch brothernature for information.

[VP Baltar]

No. Lurkers still need to be observed. What I'm saying is that town needs to be careful, and only to lynch lurkers after they are absolutely sure it is done with scummy intentions.

I'm not sure how one differentiates town lurking vs. scum lurking if both modes include posting nothing.

[hiphop]

Lynching a lurker is always hard to do, because they don't post anything for anyone to get a read on them.

I say we deal with lurkers the second day. If he is still lurking by then, we can lynch him then. We still have five days before we need to decide anyways. There is one lurker, yet two scum. So that must mean there is at least one scum active. Let's find scum.

[PorkchopExpress]

Wouldn't it be better to try and use the information we have Day 2, rather than policy lynch a lurker?

[hiphop]

Wouldn't it be better to try and use the information we have Day 2, rather than policy lynch a lurker?

Sure, it would be better to lynch someone based on better info. What do you propose we do about the lurker?

[brothernature]

As I said in my other game, sorry, but I spilt coke all over my modem and had to go about replacing it. Took the better part of the day finding one and hooking it up and such.

What makes you so certain that hohum isn't just lurking scum who is more than happy to let a mislynch of brother nature go through?

Scum do tend to lurk when the attention is turned away from him. He suddenly swings the spotlight on to me and dissapears, never to be seen again.

I'm not. That's why I want a hohum replacement ASAP, before we lynch brothernature.

Why are you so gunho about lynching me? Scum trying for an easy mislynch, perhap? You've never even provided your own case against me, just tried to make a wagon after VP made his against me. So don't you talk about lynching me until you show me WHY you want to lynch me.

I say we lynch bn today

Again, why so gunho about lynching me?

I'm here. I'm rereading the topic now. thoughts to come

Still waiting for that reread hohum. It can't take that long to read and comment on 12 pages dude. You've had almost two days as of this post.

[VP Baltar]

@ hip hop and porkchop-how about some scum hunting?
Also, PE is correct, lynching a lurker on D2 of this game is an awful idea because if we mislynch today we are most likely going to be in lylo.


I didn't realize deadline was so close, people really need to start contributing because I have nothing better than weak reads on people and that is ridiculous on page 8.

[zwetschenwasser]

Every post bn makes confirms him as scum in my eyes.

[VP Baltar]

What was scummy in his last post zwet?

[zwetschenwasser]

he's being completely noncommittal. He's showing hesitancy to provide us with a clear, unambiguous suspicion list.