/in-Vitational Game 4 (Game Over!)

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:08 am

Vote Pooky

I agree with Iamasarian2.

populartajo · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:18 am

Im preparing a big post for tonight with wagon analysis and such. I think I have a decent idea of at least two scum with how things went out yesterday.

In the meanwhile Ill contribute with the Pookyhate. Post or perish.

Vote: Pooky.

populartajo · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:22 am

Kmd4390 wrote:
Vote Pooky

I agree with Iamasarian2.

Kmd, who is scum?

elvis_knits · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:29 am

I want to look at Ojanen again. I'm thinking there is atleast a chance that Ojanen investigated VP or maybe even ekiM. Which makes me feel lame of course for my behavior yesterday with regards to stopping VP wagon. We may not be sure of who Ojanen looked at, but I think it's worth it to try to see who Ojanen was suspicious of. She definitely went after VP hard, and nothing could really dissuade her.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:30 am

Tajo, scum are as follows:
ekiM, Pooky, Yos, and if we have 4 scum, one of Charter/Zu, if five scum, then both. Not in any particular order.

VP Baltar · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 4:33 am

iamausername wrote:
Vote: PookyTheMagicalBear

rofl and VP are still scum, but Pooky has given us absolutely nothing, and that needs to stop.

Do you think Pooky is scum or would you be satisfied with a policy lynch at this point?

roflcopter · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:02 am

i don't think there's any chance that ojanen investigated baltar

vote: kmd

elvis_knits · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:05 am

roflcopter wrote:i don't think there's any chance that ojanen investigated baltar

ekiM it is then.

vote ekiM

roflcopter · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:09 am

rereading some day two ojanen myself right now

elvis_knits · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:10 am

Wait what am I doing. I might as well vote kmd.

unvote; vote kmd

roflcopter · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:12 am

eh, ojanen took a whole bunch of exposition to get around to voting ekim yesterday. i think if she had a goon result she would have just dropped a vote first thing.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:20 am

What is the case on me?

roflcopter · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:35 am

Kmd4390 wrote:What is the case on me?

failure to be town

where's your magical votecount analysis?

elvis_knits · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:07 am

Also, kmd, your avatar grosses me out. Ew.

Yosarian2 · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:22 am

Kmd4390 wrote:What is the case on me?

You looked scummy day 1, for reason I explained on day 2. On day 2, you argued with me for a bit in defense of yourself day 2, then you vanished and lurked.

I agree we need to hear from Pooky, but at this moment, I actually think you're more likely lurker scum then he is.

Doing a re-read on ojanen now. Re-reading her, I doubt she investigated either eikM or VP; early in day 2 she voted eikM, and didn't mention VP, and later in day 2 she voted VP and didn't mention eikM.

-Day 2 started Augest 23rd, she voted eikM on the 24th, didn't vote VP until she did a iso read on him on the 28th. If she had a guilty on VP, I doubt she would someone else for 4 days and 8 posts.

-On the other hand, late in the day, she listed her suspects, and eikM wasn't even on the list. I'm pretty sure she didn't get a guilty on him, either.

If I had to guess, I might guess that she got a "not goon" reading on someone, perhaps Xyl considering how hard she was defending him.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:41 am

Rofl, I don't have the votes in order. If I have time to do my own vote counts for the entire 46 pages some time soon, I'll do it. Until then, I have no analysis.

EK, blame Ether. Or you can blame Kise for losing an avatar bet to me. The avatar is there until I lose a new bet.

Yos, I was V/LA, so I didn't have much choice but to "vanish". I'm back now though and am ready to respond to more than just the bare minimum like I've been limited to recently.

roflcopter · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:40 am

kmd, i'd like to refer you to this post and ask you to pay more attention to the game and do the votecount analysis (or any analysis whatsoever) instead of sitting on your hands.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:11 pm

@Iam

"Rofl and VP are still scum, but Pooky has given us absolutely nothing and that needs to stop."

Well, that statement kinda seems to say you believe Rofl/VP to be scum, but u dont want to kill them, but rather want to kill me, you say nothing about my alignment but say you'd rather kill me. imo you seem to want to kill what is in your mind a noncontributor over two scumbags. Which does seem rather untownly.

PS. What exactly do you want me to give you? You seem rather upset.

@KMD,

So you agree with Iam that rofl/VP are scum, but you'd rather kill me in a fit of righteous rage over my perceived noncontribution than go after the people you believe to be scum?

@Tajo, stop hating, the alpacas will not like it.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:14 pm

wait i just reread tajo's pos.

"Im preparing a big post for tonight with wagon analysis and such. I think I have a decent idea of at least two scum with how things went out yesterday.

In the meanwhile Ill contribute with the Pookyhate. Post or perish. "

that got me giggling a little.

So all three players voting me either have solid scumreads on TWO other players or a decent idea, but are choosing to hatevote a noncontributor without even explaining what they want me to contribute?

SerialClergyman · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:20 pm

Sorry, why is noone voting Baltar?

We just had a massive derailing of a wagon, running up Xyl who is now confirmed town led by roflcopter and yet when day breaks on D3 he's back to his kmd case and it's like nothing happened.

Voting for Pooky isn't the best course of action either - we have plenty to look at from the last couple of days, man up (or woman up) and pick your scum.

The two people we know for sure are town thanks to their flips were either on or instigating the Baltar wagon, and the push to switch to someone else was led by the scummiest group. Back on, kiddies.

vote VP Baltar

In other news, only one dead tonight. There was no flavour delinearating kills on D1, they were both killed. I had thought it's possible itshim was a vig kill and that theory is still possible, but it looks to me like there was a double kill on Ojanen last night from anti-town groups.

SerialClergyman · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:21 pm

Simulposted, but ostensibly I agree with Pooky.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:24 pm

roflcopter wrote:kmd, i'd like to refer you to this post and ask you to pay more attention to the game and do the votecount analysis (or any analysis whatsoever) instead of sitting on your hands.

Wow, missed that. Now all I have to do is find out where everyone else was voting at the time and I can find me some scum. Thanks Xyl!

Pooky, when did I say VP and Rofl are scum? I agree with Iam that we need some votes on you, not with ALL of his reads.

Pooky wrote:So all three players voting me either have solid scumreads on TWO other players or a decent idea, but are choosing to hatevote a noncontributor without even explaining what they want me to contribute?

Actually, your lack of contribution is exactly why I have a scum read on you. You haven't given opinions on players/events along with reasons for said opinions. Why do you need specifics before you can contribute? You've been around long enough to know how the game works.

PookyTheMagicalBear · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:30 pm

um KMD,

iam said:

"
Vote: PookyTheMagicalBear

rofl and VP are still scum, but Pooky has given us absolutely nothing, and that needs to stop. "

and you said in the next post:

"Vote Pooky

I agree with Iamasarian2. "

which I thought meant you read his post and agreed with it, including the part about rofl and VP being scum.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:52 pm

Let me quote the part I agree with.

Pooky quoting Iam wrote:Pooky has given us absolutely nothing, and that needs to stop.

iamausername · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Tue Sep 08, 2009 2:20 pm

VP Baltar wrote:Do you think Pooky is scum or would you be satisfied with a policy lynch at this point?

Pooky has given me almost* no way to tell if he is scum or town. I want this to change. So far, Pooky has apparently had no incentive to change this, I'm hoping that the threat of a lynch will provide him with one. So, if he still fails to give any contribution at all, then yes, I would be satisfied carrying that through to a lynch. Otherwise the threat wouldn't be there, and so the incentive wouldn't be there, and so the whole thing would be pointless.

*he did hop onto the Xyl wagon yesterday; this gives me something to work with on determining Pooky's alignment. And it's not something that makes him look good.

Yos2 wrote: If I had to guess, I might guess that she got a "not goon" reading on someone

I think this is very likely the case. Not sure who, but then, "not goon" isn't a particularly useful result anyway.

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:PS. What exactly do you want me to give you?

Some idea of who you think is scum. Reasons would be nice too, but they're not so important.

SerialClergyman wrote:We just had a
massive derailing of a wagon
, running up Xyl who is now confirmed town
led by roflcopter
and yet when day breaks on D3 he's back to his kmd case and it's like nothing happened.

Let's everybody please pay attention to the bolded when VP flips scum.

SerialClergyman wrote:it looks to me like there was a double kill on Ojanen last night from anti-town groups.

Pay more attention when you're given setup info.