Open 166-Lovers Mafia (Game Over!) - before 838

Amished · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:37 am

EBWOP:

@Sironi: What kind of elimination makes anybody my partner? A buss before it becomes obvious that it's necessary is often the most effective one.

Kise · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:37 am

Ninja'd again.

I'm trying to give le Chat something to talk about. We can still talk about this, if you want:

Unvote; Vote: Amished

Amished · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:37 am

@Kise: You should know we do from playing together elsewhere.

Now answer the question.

Kise · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:37 am

If you ninja me one more time....

Amished · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:38 am

You can't make somebody talk about anything without voting for them?

Kise · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:38 am

CONFIRM VOTE: AMISHED

I answered the question already. Post 76.

Amished · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:39 am

lol ninja >_>

Kise · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:39 am

GAAAAAH INTERCEPTION!

Answer: Correct. We have nothing else to go on. If you think we have something else to go on, please state it. Also, I asked Sponge a question the other day. Could you refer to it and address that, please?

Kise · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:41 am

Doublepost, finally?

BBL.

Kise · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:41 am

(yes!)

Amished · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:52 am

So to question anybody/make them talk about a topic, you need to vote for them. Got it.

le Chat is neutral town due to not hammering, but backing that up with reason rather than looking like just not voting so as not to get an instant quicklynch on him tomorrow for his play today.

Dram is my top suspect at the moment for the blatant wagoning with weak reasoning.

Sironi is also suspicious due to the partner speculation with no real reasoning behind it, and answering for Dram (page two). Could be a link, but unsure of that right now.

Far_Cry is looking to be logical and pro-town in my eyes, nothing major to make me suspicious there.

As for you, Kise; I'm undecided. I'm leaning towards town due to you looking like you're trying to question motivations, but picking up on something small like what you did and leading everybody around isn't often beneficial to the game.

Where do your suspicions lie, other than on me? On le chat who you voted for? Somebody else? With this being a nightless setup, I think everyone should post a most town to least town list (because there are no NK's, this gives everyone a reference point for later on in the game and doesn't endanger anybody by looking pro-town).

Kise · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:07 am

Far_Cry wrote:I've played a few games with Kise before (even a Lover's game not too long ago), and looking at how he's played so far, I believe he is town. I understand why he would attack Spongebob for what he did. I even would understand why he placed a vote.

Hmm... You do remember I voted for Emp early on in that game and mislynched him right? You don't think my early vote in this game bears any resemblance to the last?

I could care less if this gets me scumpoints, but if you're giving me townpoints based off meta, you don't think I'm being opportunistic with my vote on Sponge/Amish; ie, do you find my reasons justifiable?

Kise · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:13 am

Far_Cry wrote:Spongebob's "slip" was definitely something to note down, and was also suspicious in my opinion. But L-1 at page 2??? Someone on that wagon is scum.

So this mean you defo don't think Sponge/Amish is scum, correct?

Kise · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:14 am

Most Town:

Kise

Least Town:

Everyone else

Amished · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:27 am

Unvote
Vote: Kise

Go through a list. Now.

VP Baltar · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:08 am

Vote Count #3

Amished-3 (Sironigous, dramonic, Kise)
Kise-1 (Amished)

Not Voting:

le Chat, Far_Cry

With

6

alive, it takes

4

to lynch. Day 1 deadline is September 18.

dramonic · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm

Amished

My vote on Sponge is/was due to his blatant contradicting himself. However since that is a vote based on playstyle fallacy, I'll remove it for now (since you can't correct his fallacies).

Unvote

Actually, I'm not convinced with your innocence, but with the replacement my vote has lost its reason.

Amished · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:42 pm

Hey there Dram, how's it going? Who else do you think is scummy?

dramonic · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:03 pm

On the basis that the case on Sponge wasn't bad per se, Le Chat's evidence would give me a feel of

A) Scum scared to garner suspicion, so not hammering
B) Scum that can't hammer his buddy

know what I'm saying?

Vote: Le Chat

Amished · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:06 pm

Unvote
Vote: Dramonic

dramonic · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:18 pm

Now now, why would you do that? :3

Amished · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:21 pm

I will give my reasonings when another player (not you nor Kise) comes in and asks if they can't figure it out themselves. Why do you expect I did that?

dramonic · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:23 pm

Because you probably believe I am throwing the blame on Chat for having not hammered since I am scum and that way I could have gotten him lynched instead of myself on "day 2" because he'd have hammered without much reasoning?

Or something like that?

Amished · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:51 pm

Not even close.

Kise · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:52 pm

Amished is upset because you voted for his partner, dram. That's why.