Manzcar, I know I do that. I've done that in virtually every game I've ever played with this account as well as my other account (Quagmire).Manzcar wrote:Sam you have the habit of throwing out accusations wihout why you suspect them.
What makes you think Sudai is a good suspect?
Sudai is suspicious because he drifted through yesterday without saying much and hopped on the lego bandwagon when it became painstakingly obvious that he was the lynch candidate for today.
Look, this case on me is totally legitimate here. I did attempt to divert attention away from lego because I didn't think he was the lynch candidate that day and I got stronger scum vibes from itacv2. I stand by that line of reasoning day one, it just turns out I was ass-backwards and totally wrong. Sometimes I read people correctly and sometimes I don't -- that's really the only defense I can give you here.Sam your case on itvac was weak at best. It mostly centered around that he was attacking Lego who is known scum and his inability to aritculate simply. You didn't even give reasons for why he was scummy until pressed at the end of the day. And even then some of the reasons you gave were things said after you made the "your scummy" comment. Ivac made a comment that you were trying to get the attention off of you and put on him. You retorted that yes that is what happened but at the time there was no real attention on either of you, but itvac was putting all kinds of pressure on Lego and attention was falling on him directly. Your comment on him being scum pulled all attention off of Lego and put it on itvac who had a mini melt down and said some stuff that was taken as scummy. Mission accomplished. In fact you stayed very far away from Lego until the cop claimed a guilty on him. At that time he was doomed but when attention was thrown at you you wanted to get to the nigt as soon as possible.
It was more of an attempt to throw attention away from lego. I still don't think the day one case on lego was totally legit... I thought it was just as plausible that lego, during day one, could have been a newbie town not necessarily knowing how to play other than a scumbag. That's why my read on him was neutral; I didn't have a good enough read on him to be convinced either way.I clearly see an attempt to not throw attention on Lego. Get attention on others. You found itvac scummy on less evidence than what was out there on Lego. Sam I find you scummyvote Sam
In any case though this is a fair case on me, and I can't really come up with any other defense than what I've said already and that's also not WIFOM.
