Alright, so inHim has this really stupid form of tunneling - I pretty much really, really want to be right, so everything that a player (whom I have suspected) does I tend to view it with a "why would scum do this" angle, and force my opinion to be right to me.
raj thinks it's dumb, but he can't spell so he won't post (real reason is grad school has started), so I'm stuck trying to right the Krew's ship, and I'm doing so with a fresh read on the game.
Mighty Orbots - has brought helpful contributions to the game. I still want to think that Zito has been slipping up and the hydra is scum, but mechanical advice so sound, a high activity rate (conveying excitement and commitment), and 10 other players saying I'm an idiot surely all rate MO as more town than I first gave him credit.
possible Off Stage partners
: G&B, maybe Seraphim
zwetschenwasser - I like the votes for zwet based on previous principles that z himself has established, but not the reasons for those votes. It's zwet, we pretty much all know what to usually expect, and now that he is making some more thorough posts, people want to lynch him over that. It seems unfair, and I think unfair is often scum-related. Some specific items I do not like from zwet are that he kept on saying how he was not comfortable with the mechanics, like it was a crutch, and then some parroting of suspicion. One example of parroting:
zwetschenwasser wrote:I agree with Gaspar. It seems like a telling slip to me.
possible Off Stage partners
: Thok, Gaspar (this was a bit tougher)
So, for now, it will be an unvote, and then more review. Currently, I think we are in a good position - most people are active and paying attention, and we can comfortably use all of our time, as On-Camera decisions are pointing to Valentine driving, which I very much agree is the right choice, and they are aware of the Off Stage signals.
-inHim
unvote