His early play defined the "middle" section of posters that I've taken to looking for scum in. Furthermore, I'm bothered by the fact that so many of his posts are littered with small compliments. They fill up space making him look busier than he is and they're designed to elicit good will towards himself. He quickly jumps Exalt to L-1 by simply quoting the argument of others and he's shown little desire to hunt for scum himself.ekiM wrote:DDD - got reasons or not? Don't be coy, now.
ConfidAnon wrote:I'm most comfortable with putting my vote on Raivann to start the new day.
Vote: Raivann
Alright.Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:His early play defined the "middle" section of posters that I've taken to looking for scum in. Furthermore, I'm bothered by the fact that so many of his posts are littered with small compliments. They fill up space making him look busier than he is and they're designed to elicit good will towards himself. He quickly jumps Exalt to L-1 by simply quoting the argument of others and he's shown little desire to hunt for scum himself.ekiM wrote:DDD - got reasons or not? Don't be coy, now.
Please find time to catch up soon, or, if you don't have the time, consider requesting replacement.ConfidAnon wrote:Replacement avoidance, sorry, RL is crazy.
Welcome. You are a confirmed townie mason. Good news: nobody will be questioning your motivations at all. Bad news: you're going to die tonight. I suggest you make the most of today! Read through and give us your fresh perspective, ask questions, etc.Netlava wrote:/confirm
I think it was just a light hearted comment. Citing it as a reason for a vote seem like reaching. I agree that we shouldn't be taking everything toro said as gospel though.Muzz wrote:@Ekim: it's not so much about him acknowledging it now as it is about him ignoring it for the two weeks in which Toro was alive. That, combined with the fact that his entire case on me is based on Toro's misinterpreted crap, tells me that he's going for townie cred by association with Toro.
IIRC at the time of this post, Toro had hardly posted. Explain how you think, then, that Toro is scum when he barely posted.raivann wrote:I'm thinking scumteam is DDD/Toro.
Bad reason. You seem to be aware of that. Seems like you are just putting random things out there for the sake of putting random things out there (read: to look active).raivann wrote:FrankiePeanuts was criticized for making more analysis than suspicions and not wanting to ruffle feathers, then Zazie replaces him and goes overboard with questions and says 'noted' alot. Not much but it's more than I have on DDD
Not an excuse for why your vote is someone who ISN'T on your scumlist.muzzz wrote:Boredom, mostly.
Explain how tunneling is "always bad." (It's not)muzzz wrote:And regardless of that, tunneling is always bad.
You believe itacv2's claim but you still want him to name his partner? Then what's the point of having him name his partner?raivann wrote:I believe itacv2's claim and I too think he should name his partner
If you really think there's scum on the itacv2 wagon, then who? Plus, I don't think a townie would think a wagon on him is justified. Scum are more likely to think so for obvious reasons.raivann wrote:I might seem scummy and been playing subpar to this point,but I really think there was scum on that itacv2 wagon.
Completely out of the blue and with no explanation. You hardly paid him any attention earlier in the game.raivann wrote:vote:muzzz
Don't care if my vote is the hammer or not but this was really scummy:Raivann wrote:No, scumteam is not muzzz/Raivann.Netlava wrote: I think muzzz & raivann are scum.
I think this is one thing Muzzz and I can agree on.
Have our interactions shown you anything to make you think we are scum partners?
