Mini 808 - Rabbit Doubt Mafia: Over!

[Battousai]

Batt's Post 1071 - If the person's scummy to you, why not lynch them beforehand? Why the distraction?

If you are talking about the third player in the end game scenerio: It's an end game scenario.

[Looker]

KMD's Post 1074 - Hmm...okay, so we got two...Should I bother asking why...?

Batt's Post 1075 - But then what would you have doing all the way up

until

the end game scenario? Who would you have lynched that entire time? There can't be

that

many scum, can there?

Can there?

[Kmd4390]

You can't be read because you claim to have not read your Role PM. Scum won't kill you. We have to lynch you.

[Iecerint]

We should lynch players who'll give us more information first and lynch players who'll give us less information later. Looker will give us less information. Therefore, we should lynch him later.

The exception is if you think Looker is lying scum. In that case, Looker gives lots of information, because he knows his alignment. But otherwise, I think lynching someone else is preferable.

[Battousai]

KMD's Post 1074 - Hmm...okay, so we got two...Should I bother asking why...?

Batt's Post 1075 - But then what would you have doing all the way up

until

the end game scenario? Who would you have lynched that entire time? There can't be

that

many scum, can there?

Can there?

Tell me, in you world, does everyone always lynch whoever YOU find somewhat scummy. And in this world, do you feel comfortable lynching someone who is somewhat scummy over anyone you felt was scummy?

But seriously, do you expect all endgames to be between 3 obv-town players every single time?

Are you going ot read your role pm or not?

[Gregory]

Tell me, do you want someone near lylo that would be a... "random lynch."

No, I want to lynch scum. Looker hasn't done anything, and the things she has done, are irrelivant, because she didn't even know her own role.

we could lynch her, just because we don't know anything about her. But to me, that sounds like a pretty lame reason. allthough I can understand why people do want looker to be lynched. Not reading your pm until late day 2 is waiting for problems.

i didn't say greg's points should be taken off the table, i am just pointing out that greg admitted his case was crap, but then attacks mole for basically agreeing with the fact that the case on me was crap.

great job at twisting my words. Were did I attack mole on? I'll give the answer: The name restriction and the fact I got 4 votes for a bad case. The last thing wasn't against mole alone.

kmd: no. a warning would suffice, but a modkill would certainly net us some information.

What info?

Greg's Post 1061 - Lol, unless I fake it? Well, either way, I have a question for you. Do you believe anti-town and scummy are synonymous?

No, ever played with empking? Maybe he's allways scummy. It's a fact he's allways anti-town. Scummy would mean someone does want to see town loose, or scum win. Anti-town means someone doesn't want to do anything for town to win.

KMD, are you allways this silent?

[don_johnson]

no real twist there. please show how the last thing wasn't against mole and i will retract the statement.

info about mole:

a mod warning confirms the existence of the post restriction.

a mod kill both confirms the existence of the post restriction and molestar's alignment.

i'm going to reread batt in iso. i don't like his constant misdirectional votes. i also(upon reread) do not like his rvs statements and soft claim.

[Kmd4390]

Greg, how am I silent? I've given my opinions. We are lynching Looker. If not Looker, then Don. We are NOT lynching you, Mastin, or Molest.

[don_johnson]

why are we lynching me or looker? mole has been less active since his slip-up and we have no mod confirmation of whether or not his postrestriction exists which should logically tell us that he is lieing.

mod: molestar has broken his alleged post restriction. what penalty should we expect here?

I already have.

Then how about helping me out and linking me to it / explaining again?

^^ the post has not so much as been edited to reflect the pr. does the matter of truth in this regard not mean anything to anybody?

what is the case on looker? minus the modkilkl request, what is the case against me? as i explained, a modkill request is no different from a dayvig attempt. i find it extremely scummy that the restriction was broken without so much as an edit or reprimand.

unvote, vote molestargazer

fine. i'll put more emphasis on this subject. moles defense was "he's trying to get a townie modkilled." why would a townie fake a post restriction for this long?

[Iecerint]

Kmd's "we are not lynching these people" list are pretty much my 3 favorite lynches.

DJ, the case against you is your bizarre "not everyone has to scumhunt" comment and the associated comments. The case on Looker is just a policy lynch as far as I can tell. I agree that Batt looks bad for buying into it. I'm not sure why you don't think Kmd looks bad for buying into it; maybe you do and just haven't said as much.

I'd vote MSG with you if I weren't too busy voting Greg.

[molestargazer]

I know there's nothing that I can do or say to convince you that the post restriction is real.
I don't know why the mod's spared me. I'm grateful he has.

You, however, have no idea as to my role and all of a sudden you want me dead. You want to end the day, without further discussion as to who else wants me lynched and why (Information that could help the town a LOT if it comes to my death) and

possibly

have the town punished for your idiocy.

20* A modkill will end the day. However, if the modkill is used for strategic reasons, one player on your side will get punished.

Feel free to vote for me. Explain why, if you even have a case apart from the post restriction.
Give reasons APART from the damn post restriction, and I'll GLADLY explain them to you.

You look scummy as hell.

[molestargazer]

why would a townie fake a post restriction for this long?

They wouldn't. The restriction is REAL.

[Iecerint]

Well, MM was pretty scummy (at best, unhelpful). Not that I expect you to explain that to me, but it's something other than your restriction.

I wish Tenchi and Mastin's slots had players in them. : /

[don_johnson]

molestar: i have no case on you other than the fact that there is no proof of your post restriction existing. if you want me to move my vote then pm the mod and ask him to confirm its existence in some way. i am not asking specifically for modkill, but a post edit, an in thread warning, or anything of that vein would help right now.

ice: i will gladly come back to greg. my suspicions of batt are not just his recent action, but his last few. i can detail it more later. tbh, i am ignoring kmd as i think his issue with me is personal. i lurked through a game with both he and molest for a scum win. it was lame. but i won. so whatever. if he presents a good case i will refute it, but right now there doesn't seem to be much against me and asking me to continue explaining statements i have already attempted to explain isn't going to get us anywhere. it should be obvious by now that i am, in fact, contributing and scumhunting. because i simultaneously have the belief that not everybody has to participate on the same level does not make me scum. to put it hypothetically: i have seen plenty of town power roles lurk through games as long as they could. non-participation =/= scummy in all instances.

[Looker]

yea, i wish tenchi and mastin were here, too. two good players...

[Kmd4390]

Iec is probably town.

I'm gonna be on a pretty bad V/LA for the next couple of weeks btw.

[Looker]

You know what's really weird? I'm

intentionally

being confusing with you guys but you can see right through it; however, my fuckin' boyfriend, whose known me for years, can't see through shit. What the fuckin fuck? How is that possible? You guys don't know shit about me, I mean, you know absolutely NOTHING at all; however...whatever man. I just wanted to get that off my chest. Fuckin' loser...

[don_johnson]

^^ trouble in paradise?

[Iecerint]

Kmd, may I ask on what basis I am town. You've said that several times, but I don't really understand how you come to that conclusion. Namely, I'm not scumhunting as much in this game as I usually do (not for lack of trying), and I've posted in this game less than I usually do.

[Iecerint]

EBWOP: ?*

[Battousai]

Repeating question to Looker- Will you look at your role pm, and give us some flavor from it to prove it?

[Iecerint]

I second Batt's request.

[ZazieR]

mod: molestar has broken his alleged post restriction. what penalty should we expect here?

If a player breaks a rule or fakes breaking a rule, he will be punished for doing so. The punishment depends on the infraction.

[Iecerint]

If a player...fakes breaking a rule...he will be punished for doing so. The punishment depends on the infraction.

What if a player breaks a fake rule? Does that constitute faking breaking a rule?

[Looker]

No. Why don't you let everyone know who

you

are.