emptyger wrote:Most of what I posted is a defensive response to your attacks, so if you don’t have response to it, then I’m done too.
I mean, I could respond to it because there are still points there that I disagree with you on, but I think it might be best if we leave that for now before it just becomes a huge distraction for the town. I think we've both made our points clear enough.
emptyger wrote:I’d like you to explain how what you’ve done with Jebus isn’t the exact same thing you’ve said is a suspicious thing I’ve done to Jason.
You're welcome to call it that if you'd like. It doesn't nullify that is what you were doing. What is strange to me about you and jason, however, is that you seemed to be suspicious of jason, so I don't know why you would try and detract from attacks on him. With Jebus, I don't have much of an opinion either way yet, nor do I think attacking someone who clearly needs to be replaced is helpful to the town's end.
emptyger wrote:Also, what do you think about this?
I'm curious as to why Juls would help research a point that she claims to have disagreed with. Seems very strange to support a line of quetioning and then in hindsight call it bad.
Dear Everyone,
Stop talking about breadcrumbing.
Thanks,
The Management