dont like peer pressure CDB...beside the ML vote is too easy.
speaking of easy
because he is not here and can not defend himself.
lol,hasdgfas wrote:I voted CKD because his entire post was scummy. He started by basically telling us to post as little as possible so he could be sure to catch up. Anti-town.Kublai Khan wrote:Fair enough, coy boy.ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm voting CKD because he refused to vote MacavityLock with me, not because of his vote for you. I found his lack of camaraderie disappointing.
unvote
Vote: hasdgfas
Then, hypocrisy. Doesn't like CKD's vote because it's "too easy" yet he votes for an easy target himself.
so just for the record...was this scummier than my "not voting this person because it is too easy, so i will vote someone who is not here" post or less?Quagmire wrote:This post was scummy. You're on thin ice.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol,hasdgfas wrote:I voted CKD because his entire post was scummy. He started by basically telling us to post as little as possible so he could be sure to catch up. Anti-town.Kublai Khan wrote:Fair enough, coy boy.ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm voting CKD because he refused to vote MacavityLock with me, not because of his vote for you. I found his lack of camaraderie disappointing.
unvote
Vote: hasdgfas
Then, hypocrisy. Doesn't like CKD's vote because it's "too easy" yet he votes for an easy target himself.
unvote, vote Hasdgfas
for taking a first random/irony joke vote trying to run with it.
fair enough.hasdgfas wrote:I hate the RVS. I will make a serious vote in the second post if I see a little thing I can jump on to get real discussion started.curiouskarmadog wrote:unvote, vote Hasdgfas
for taking a first random/irony joke vote trying to run with it.
hasdgfas wrote:I find that so-called "joke votes" are a great place to look for scum, because it's where they think they're safe. Why is this different from any other time someone takes what's meant to be a "joke vote" seriously? Are all of them vote-worthy? If not, why is mine?Kublai Khan wrote:Hasdgfas confirmed that he was indeed taking a joke vote seriously.
Budja wrote:Feels like a scummy attempt to return to RVS.CKD wrote: lol,
unvote, vote Hasdgfas
for taking a first random/irony joke vote trying to run with it.
unvote, vote curiouskarmadog
explain HOW my previous vote has ANYTHING to do with being semi-random...Budja wrote:Ok, maybe it is more of a bad-reason vote than a random vote, It looks like the kind of reasoning that is used for semi-random votes.
not once in any game as scum or town, have I seen anyone try to return to the RVS stage? What about Bud reasoning do you think is sound..what is off?Kublai Khan wrote:If you're trying to return to the RVS after some semi-serious to serious discussion started, then it really looks like you're trying to squash that discussion because you don't like the direction it's headed.curiouskarmadog wrote:but lets say, for shits and giggles...it was. you are voting me because I want to return to the RVS? How is that scummy? How do you think as scum returning to RVS is helpful for scum?
Budja's reasoning is sound, but I think his read is off.
curiouskarmadog wrote:explain HOW my previous vote has ANYTHING to do with being semi-random...Budja wrote:Ok, maybe it is more of a bad-reason vote than a random vote, It looks like the kind of reasoning that is used for semi-random votes.
curiouskarmadog wrote:
==
more answers please.
curiouskarmadog wrote:explain HOW my previous vote has ANYTHING to do with being semi-random...Budja wrote:Ok, maybe it is more of a bad-reason vote than a random vote, It looks like the kind of reasoning that is used for semi-random votes.
Budja wrote:
@CKD, voting for someone for pushing out of the random stage could have an effect of dampening communication and is generally bad reasoning. I dislike that.
curiouskarmadog wrote: more answers please.
curiouskarmadog wrote:explain HOW my previous vote has ANYTHING to do with being semi-random...Budja wrote:Ok, maybe it is more of a bad-reason vote than a random vote, It looks like the kind of reasoning that is used for semi-random votes.
Budja wrote: Feels like a scummy attempt to return to RVS.
unvote, vote curiouskarmadog
you clearly are voting me because you thought was was trying to return back to RVS. stating you thought my vote was semi random.Budja wrote:CKD's attack/vote on you is weak anyway and feels quite a lot like a random vote.
I removed my random vote to place this real one. How is that wanting to return to the RVS or random. caught you scum bag.curiouskarmadog wrote:lol,hasdgfas wrote:I voted CKD because his entire post was scummy. He started by basically telling us to post as little as possible so he could be sure to catch up. Anti-town.Kublai Khan wrote:Fair enough, coy boy.ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm voting CKD because he refused to vote MacavityLock with me, not because of his vote for you. I found his lack of camaraderie disappointing.
unvote
Vote: hasdgfas
Then, hypocrisy. Doesn't like CKD's vote because it's "too easy" yet he votes for an easy target himself.
unvote, vote Hasdgfas
for taking a first random/irony joke vote trying to run with it.
what did I do to hit your scumdar?Porochaz wrote:Ok, am disliking currently Budja and Kublai Khan. Budja as I dislike his case on ckd, and Kublai Khan because he seems to be getting overly emotional over attacks on him. CKD has also hit my scumdar early on but not enough to even consider at this early stage.vote Kublai Khanwins it over budja.
it doesnt matter what the mod did after the vote..what matters is the mod stated the deadline was 6pm..Bud voted at 8pm...usually when a mod sets a deadline..that deadline doesnt change.ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm reluctant to poke around with the timing of the deadline seeing as the mod said it hit 12 hours late and included Budja in the vote count.
and mole was what, what is your point??Budja wrote:Ok, I'm back now.
Macavity is right, this is essentially LyLo. +town for bringing it up. Why not wait for the scum-kill to narrow down our options?
I suggest no vigs use their action, at least not yet.
CKD, your case is weaker than mole's .
you sure about that buddy?Kublai Khan wrote:Well, the gut connects to the ass which does sound like the place you pulled that statistic from. So it could be legit.curiouskarmadog wrote:am I sure of my "case"? No, but as KK said, not much to go on....going with my gut and my gut tends to be right...at least 60%+ of the time (I track the lynches I am on).