The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

[Setael]

Zwet's post looked pretty obviously like sarcasm to me.

[Pyromaniac]

To quote a meme: are you bleind.
zwets post say can we NOT have another no lynch.

[Pyromaniac]

Can we

not

have another no lynch today? Just saying.

[zwetschenwasser]

Then why is he the one who asked if we can't do another no-lynch?

I'm going to take this as genuine confusion, not scumminess.

[Setael]

It's semantics then. The sentence can be read as Can't we have another no lynch? (sarcasm)

Can't we = can we not

see how it could be confusing?

Either way, it's not scummy and it's time to talk about something else. Like why light-kun has disappeared when he should be claiming.

[Pyromaniac]

can we not have another no lynch. seems like he doesn't want a no lynch.

[populartajo]

I read it as zwet asking for opinions on having another no lynch (I think the "just saying" at the end reinforces this idea) but Im prob not the best source since english is not my first language.

Anyway, in more important news, I just checked Light profile and his last post in the site is in this game, two days ago, so

mod prod him, please.

Waiting for a plausible/non plausible claim before starting the "I give ma doll" operation.

[zwetschenwasser]

You have the doll?

[populartajo]

Of course not, I think its a good name for the operation.

[Lamont_Cranston]

I want to be investigated. /wifom. (like this Zazie?)

In all seriousness, am I the only one that thinks that Lammont has the doll?

Lammont, why did you assume the doll worked like the matches and not like the shell?

Exactly what are you saying? I only said that the doll works like the shell and I said it because I am of the theory that the doll will be used as part of the town wincon. This theory is based on the first game where it was a part of the final scene where Trilby summons the boy to kill him.

[Lamont_Cranston]

I read it as zwet asking for opinions on having another no lynch (I think the "just saying" at the end reinforces this idea) but Im prob not the best source since english is not my first language.

Anyway, in more important news, I just checked Light profile and his last post in the site is in this game, two days ago, so

mod prod him, please.

Waiting for a plausible/non plausible claim before starting the "I give ma doll" operation.

LOL. Tajo always comes up with the best expressions.

[Light-kun]

I know I am the wrong person, and were it an earlier day, I would be relatively okay with being given the doll and flipping innocent.

However, that would be stupid now since we already lost 7 and only one scum flipped among them.

That is not a claim

No, it's not.

vote: light-kun

My favorite thing about your post Setael is how brilliantly well reasoned it is.

L-1 now. Claim.

Acknowledged and currently ignored.

I will vote after the claim. Depending on what the claim is, of course.

Laying the floor for an unreasoned and sudden hammer...

It's semantics then. The sentence can be read as Can't we have another no lynch? (sarcasm)

Can't we = can we not

see how it could be confusing?

Either way, it's not scummy and it's time to talk about something else. Like why light-kun has disappeared when he should be claiming.

I don't claim to baseless attacks. All I've seen is shit thrown at a wall to see if it will stick. The lone person (for "meh" reasons) who has reasoned there vote is Dramonic.

Likely scum:

Pyromaniac
zwetchenwasser
Setael

Likely doll holders:
Lamont

[Devestation]

Setael is confirmed town...

[Devestation]

I agree with Deves, however add Dramonic and Zwet in that list.

No ZazieR. You and/or Lamont, point blank. You know perfectly well that neither of those players have been running the general direction of questioning in this game. For trying to add in the extra factor that would decrease the chances of you being investigated,

FoS ZazieR

.

The same could apply for Lamont, but it would assume that you two are scumbuddies, and there is nothing else that would suggest that yet (apart from not particularly probing each other, which now that I think of it, is a giveaway).

[Lamont_Cranston]

Likely doll holders:
Lamont

This is a blatant attempt to confuse things. I need to see a better defense to overcome the terrible performance of your predecessor.

[ZazieR]

I read it as zwet asking for opinions on having another no lynch (I think the "just saying" at the end reinforces this idea) but Im prob not the best source since english is not my first language.

This.

[ZazieR]

I agree with Deves, however add Dramonic and Zwet in that list.

No ZazieR. You and/or Lamont, point blank. You know perfectly well that neither of those players have been running the general direction of questioning in this game. For trying to add in the extra factor that would decrease the chances of you being investigated,

FoS ZazieR

.

The same could apply for Lamont, but it would assume that you two are scumbuddies, and there is nothing else that would suggest that yet (apart from not particularly probing each other, which now that I think of it, is a giveaway).

Are you paying attention?
You are directing the cop. Thanks for stating your opinions, but if everybody just says that I should be investigated, it will only result in a giant arrow appearing above my head, pointing at me so that the scum can see who will be investigated. When they know, they can take measurements against it. How is that helpful?
So to make this more of a problem for the scum, you add some WIFOM. If you disagree, state why.

[ZazieR]

Lamont

I want to hear an answer why you unvoted Sironigous. (Post 3305)

It''s very unlikely that Amished has the doll. I also don''t see how he phrased it in a defensive way. Can you explain how he did according to you? (Post 3306)

If you think that claiming vanilla can be scummy, can you explain why you didn''t comment on Zwets claim? If it''s because it isn''t scummy to you, can you then explain why it isn''t? (Post 3309)

Lamont

, this^^

[Devestation]

We already HAVE a WIFOM in there, its name is Lamont Cranston. This extra WIFOM directs the investigation away from the driving forces of scumhunting in this town.

[ZazieR]

50% at best. In other words, a big chance that it's not enough.
A question: What's the point in investigating me or Lamont? So that each player knows what the allignment is of one of the main contributors?
If so, please explain how it helps catch scum.

[Devestation]

Because so far there is no reason to trust either of you two, apart from the fact that your doing a heck of a lot of scumhunting. Which ironically, is completely normal for both of you

Please point where you have last asked serious questions about each other.

[ZazieR]

Where I have asked Lamont serious questions? Please look up a few posts. It's the that manieth time I have asked them towards Lamont, as he keeps ignoring them.

[Setael]

I have said this already, but referred to the entire post rather than quoting. To be more specific, this quote sent off my scumdar:

In terms of who to lynch...grr.... tough question... of all the players, Dram sends me mixed signals, but looking at his history, I see that quite often. Could be giving too much to the manner in which he speaks, but he could be innocent... I would personally advocate a Lamont lynch or a Sir lynch at the moment, but I am lacking any strong reads. I will look at a few of the bandwagons and be back to this point.

Painfully noncommital. This kind of wishy washiness is much more likely to come from scum.

That being said, I recognize the value that I could give as confirmed town if I had time to reread and make a case on either light or someone else depending on what I found. I just don't have the time.

mod: I need to be replaced, please. I will play until someone is found. Sorry.

This is my first time replacing out of a game. Sucks.

[Stephoscope]

Are you paying attention?
You are directing the cop. Thanks for stating your opinions, but if everybody just says that I should be investigated, it will only result in a giant arrow appearing above my head, pointing at me so that the scum can see who will be investigated. When they know, they can take measurements against it. How is that helpful?
So to make this more of a problem for the scum, you add some WIFOM. If you disagree, state why.

There is no need to worry about my being "directed"...I investigated last time per town consensus for obvious reasons, but make no guarantees I would do the same thing this time around, and I don't yet even know who I will investigate.

[Pyromaniac]

So people who vote for you are scum? There are not 7 scum in this game. However, I would be hammering but I have a new theory. L-K is a jester. Rock's lurking, only posting meaningless shit looks exactly like a jester.