Mini 816: Revenge of the Monkey(GAME OVER!)

[dramonic]

And what was the thief's reason to not say who he had investigated?

[StrangerCoug]

He was waiting for everybody else to claim so scum couldn't fake based on the object stolen.

I do have a theory as to why Konowa's holding off claiming his target, but I'm not going to say what it is until he either dies or definitively tells us why (and, as I said, I'm not going to bother with him).

[Konowa]

I see no reason to inform the mafia who is confirmed town.

[charlatan]

I see no reason to inform the mafia who is confirmed town.

Agreed. Until we're on the verge of mislynching a confirmed townie, we don't need to hear it.

[dramonic]

3rd party speculation?

[Konowa]

Want to clarify what you mean by that, dramonic?

[dramonic]

You see no reason to confirm who is protown to the mafia, however the mafia obviously know who aren't their buddies, so unless there are 3rd party roles they already know who is protown <<

I'm saying you are making 3rd party speculations. If not, your current behaviour can qualify as anti-town.

[Konowa]

Before I answer your questions, what exactly are you accusing me of?

[Konowa]

Double post, sorry.

I want you to be clear what you are accusing me of. After you answer that I will show you how exactly what I am doing is pro-town.

[dramonic]

I WAS accusing you of being anti-town by keeping the town from knowing who can be trusted, but I think your reason to not reveal just hit me. Can I express why I think you are doing it after reflexion or would you rather say it yourself?

[Konowa]

I would like for you to say what you think. If it differs from the reason why I am doing it I will let you know.

[dramonic]

By not saying who you investigate, the mafia doesn't know who the confirmed town are, therefore they can't kill them as they are revealed. By doing a mass reveal later, the mafia can be overthrown.

The problem with that is that it's dependant on you not getting shot in the meantime.

[Konowa]

Exactly.

I will try and not get shot in the meantime.

Back to lynching Devestation.

[dramonic]

Hey, I'm doing what I can XD

[Sajin]

I still want an answer to my question devestation. Thanks.

[Riceballtail]

Apologies, my weekend has been exhausting, I'll reread again tomorrow, but I do find the interaction between Dev/Konowa interesting, and will be the focus of my reread.

[Devestation]

stuff

How was I laying low? Seriously? I was practically calling for your head.

Your lack of vote on me nails you as scum. Get lynched.

And I could say the same for all the other people who haven't voted yet. C'mon, jump on board! Least Konowa lynches you

[dramonic]

He's referring to the fact if you ARE cop, you know he's lying scum, therefore you should be voting him <<

[Devestation]

Town- Charlatan- I found him innocent with my super special cop powers.

Town- Get back to you on this, I make it no secret that it takes me some time to make a read on anyone, leaving me sitting here for hours at a time.

Scum- Konowa- Apparently, everything I say is scummy. EVERYTHING! Its why I don't like saying anything, because I get sick and tired of having to deal with backlash that simply snowballs into something that is totally off-track of the game. I don't even have to pull the cop CC into it or his repeated demands for me to "Get Lynched", although those are OMGUS.

Scum- See second townie.

[Konowa]

I am getting a good laugh out of all of this.

Devestation, please explain how my actions are OMGUS.

[Konowa]

Also, in case you missed it.

Why did you investigate charlatan last night?

[StrangerCoug]

You know what, Devestation is clearly not helping us here with his question dodging and OMGUS, and I've stopped caring about why he picked charlatan to investigate.

Vote: Devestation.

Also,

mod: Note sig.

[My Milked Eek]

Also, Hi Milked :3

Hi dram :3
Hi ryan :3

Vote: Devestation

Don't believe you at all. Your D1 play (evasive, non committing and borderline active lurking) is very scummy and highly inconsistent with your claim. I also don't like your suspect of investigation. I've yet to hear your reasoning behind picking charlatan, but I know now that I won't believe it.

FoS: Dramonic

:3

Rolefishing Sajin during D1 (after dev claimed). Fishing for the investigation konowa did this night. And your active lurking for most of D1.



Normally I post larger catching up posts, but I didn't bother making notes when reading the thread as I'm too tired from the weekend.


Also, announcing a V/LA of mine:
I'm gone from Aug 7 until Aug 14-15. The mod knew about this before I replaced in, so I'm just letting you guys know. I might get some Internet when I'm away (going to France ), but don't count on it.

[dramonic]

Please stop fingering me ;_;

It wasn't rolefishing, I asked why he chose such a strange formulation. I even specified I didn't ask what his role was.

I think I discussed with Konowa pretty clearly why I thought not giving his investigation was anti-town. We all have the right to our personal epiphany

I don't think I was active lurking either :3


On a sidenote, Ludicolo is so much cooler than squirtle

[My Milked Eek]

On a side note: yes, he is.
Squirtle, my old favorite, is jealous of my new love: Ludicolo, so he tries to rewin my love.


>

Am I the only one who think this is strange? Sounds real weird to me. If you could explain this comment Sajin I'd very much appreciate it.

Did I ask you to say if you were cop? No.

It's just the way you said it with the rest of your post, it sounded like "I won't say what I am, but I know Dev is scum."

Sure, you may not have asked him if he were the cop, but why ask for explanation when quoting "I may be a cop, I may not be.". Sure, you didn't

ask

is he was a cop, but the intention is there imo.


>
Sure, we have a right to an epiphany. But didn't you think Konowa had/has his reasons not to post the result? I like deducing more than epiphanies to be honest and it was easily deduced that Konowa held off announcing his investigation because:
- he didn't want to influence dev's investigation
- he hit a townie that's still alive and wants to play his cards close to his chest (is this how you say this in English?)

If the second reason wasn't obvious, then I'd believe you, but the first reason is so in your face that it needn't to be asked why he didn't claim his investigation.


>
Perhaps I chose the wrong wording. I meant active lurking in a non-committal tone kind of way.