Going back to respond piecemeal to Post 648.
Adel wrote:why was I asking him leading quations? to get some traction on him.
Once again you ignore the thrust of my point, which is that you were asking leading questions
designed to make him look scummy
. Intentionally making someone look scummy is not getting traction on them, it is setting them up. No amount of trying to explain this away will help you.
Adel wrote:yep, you got me, I'm lurking in plain sight, & evading chances to get involved with this game. Bravo to you skill!
Bravo to you sarcasm! Its almost like if you just deflect me with your razor sharp wit I'll stop making the case that you are scum!
Adel wrote:Things changed, and I decided that a lynch of FL was of paramount importance.
I'll tell you what I think makes more sense, from a motivation standpoint. I think it makes more sense that scum-Adel wanted to secure a mislynch of a major town power role (especially given that the other one, scotmany, just got proven town) and found a mechanical reason to push the lynch instead of a play based reason, than town-Adel suddenly having a flash of brilliant insight and deciding that lynching someone on a mechanical basis was the town's best move. Thats just my opinion, but I'm really keen on sharing it with everyone.
Adel wrote:I was trying to establish if he was tsq or not. That is what I was focused upon.
Adel wrote:why isn't he tsq?
Why. Does. It. Matter.
Haven't you ever played with a new player before? Even better, how about a new player with an unorthodox playstyle? You figure out how to read them based on what they do in this game.
Adel wrote:please explain this to me, because I reached exactly the opposite conclusion.
All right, let me go through my exact thought process as I read the first few pages.
1. I don't like what scot just did. Seems slimy.
2. Oh, Ren noticed that too. We're on the same page.
3. Ren is pursuing this aggressively. Good sign. Town.
Adel wrote:if you know whose alt he is please just tell me so that I will stop wasting brain cycles trying to figure it out.
Beyond the fact that relying on meta-ing other players is a crutch that I don't think is necessary, and that I don't feel the need to give my opinion on the identity of an alt which may not want to be identified, I am increasingly incredulous that a player like you, who is so plugged in to the overall site meta, has not already figured out that Ren is pretty much the polar opposite of TSQ.
Adel wrote:why is it scummy? scum killing a person on ren's wagon instead someone off of it totally killed ren's wagon. It seems like an ideal way to stop the wagon momentum to me.
But the scum DID NOT TARGET A PERSON ON REN'S WAGON. Therefore the purpose of their kill WAS NOT TO STOP WAGON MOMENTUM.
Adel wrote:he self voted, and then made spammy post after spammy post, almost none of which make sense to me from a generic townie playstyle p.o.v.
First, you seem to be applying this cookie-cutter scum tell of "self-voting" without even attempting to calibrate for the actual conditions the self-vote was made in. Second, it is clearly your opinion, and your opinion only, that Ren's posts have been "spammy" or upping the "signal-noise" ratio, and in no way provable fact. Third, as should be obvious by now, Ren's playstyle is not a generic townie playstyle, so trying to lynch him based on that simple fact is extremely dishonest.
Adel wrote:I'm not trusting that mechanical information on Ren, to the extent that I'm even double guessing how confirmed GR is.
As Ren has said, near-confirmed townies are
incredibly
inconvenient for scum. Your continued efforts to keep Ren and Goat in the lynchable category is therefore extremely scummy.
Adel wrote:If other players think I am being intentionally evasive, please let me know.
And they have, Adel. And they have.
Thats enough for now.