qwints: 2 (Gwynplaine, iamausername)
kikuchiyo: 2 (qwints, SerialClergyman)
iamausername: 1 (kikuchiyo)
Gwynplaine: 1 (dank)
Not Voting: 2 (DTMaster, Nikanor)
With 8 alive it's 5 to lynch.
Current Deadline: Monday, August 10 4:00 PM EST
No, I think inconsistency is a scum tell.iamausername wrote:Why is this scummy, exactly? Do you think her alignment changed overnight?qwints wrote:Kiku's meltdown was completely out-of-character from her day 1 play.
No, I thought the risk of losing a PR was offset by the chance of identifying the other scum. As for detailing why Kiku's behavior towards FC's lynch was scummy - that's already been covered. Kiku opposed a doc lynch, then voted for the doc lynch and told dank to hammer. Then she waffled on the lynch until the Lowell wagon showed up. Her play just doesn't make sense from a town P.O.V.iamausername wrote:Yeah, let's take a look at that 'plausible scenario', shall we? What it basically amounts to is "kiku and dank are being scummy! They must be FC's scum partners!". The only way any of this is a case against FC is if you assume that at least one of kiku/dank is scum. It doesn't make any sense to vote for him on this basis when dank and kiku's alignments are both unknown.qwints wrote:I think a re-read will show that I opposed a D1 FC lynch for policy reasons, became willing to lynch anyway due to a plausible scenario where FC was scum.
^^ Classic.Qwints wrote:No, I think inconsistency is a scum tell.
This point is valid since Hero, Mokina (and FC/Admiral and Lowell) had various slips that could be interpreted as scummy. The late breadcrumbing argument was justfied and the lover pair played inconsistantly, with faulty/weak logic.qwints wrote:Given the fact that hero and mokina were linked and had more info than the rest of the town, I do not believe kiku pressuring them was scummy. I didn't like her early vote hopping or her demand for a claim, but I think those actions were a null tell given the behavior of hero and mokina.
This is not justified for two reasons.qwints wrote: The problem with the alleged contradiction you point out is that it does not allow that evaluations of player's actions should change based on later information gained about alignment.
I agree with the null tell argment. Can you give me your interpretation on how the mason claim could have benifited town though.qwuints wrote:To directly address your question:
On day 1, before the mason claim, I found kiku's behavior scummy.After the mason claim, I re-evaluated her behavior. I now think it is a null tell - that is, it is consistent with both townie and scum play.
Very true.qwuints wrote:The key is that I "found" kiku's aggressiveness scummy; past tense.currently, I think they are a null tell given what we now know.even though kiku didn't know they lied about the mason claim, she did correctly detect mokina's inconsisticies re: hero, which justified her play.
Yes this inconsistancy is very glaring at the moment. an AtE move is very weak in comparison with her day 1 play. This is a very WIFOMish question but can you reason out why she would choose such a sub-optimal play right after her agressive move.qwuints wrote:That is why her sudden change of behavior is so bizzare and scummy.
"Everyone" didn't say that. I don't recall anyone saying that in so many words. What we know is that there were two kills last night, both on claimed town power roles. We can draw some obvious conclusions from that fact, but we should be careful not to assume too much. I'll just leave it at that as I'm not sure that a lot of setup speculation would be particularly helpful at this point.DTMaster wrote:Also to the town: Everyone said we have 3 scum players in town. I just want to clarify if this meant we have a 3 man mafia team in game or a 2 man mafia team and a SK/Werewolf.