Open 144 - Near-Vanilla - GAME OVER!

[AndyTony]

And your defense is weak.

My vote is on Ceph right now because I believe he is scum.

My post is an observation on your actions.

Do look up the details on "OMGUS" hohum, I was going to suggest "Scrabble" to you in lue of "Twister" but now it seems your just as irresponsible with letters and words.

@All
Do take note of this

[hohum]

You'd clearly rather tell me how much I suck rather than answer one simple fucking question. Classic OMGUS.

Now answer my question, dickweed.

[AndyTony]

http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php ... 1_You_Suck

I believe my conclusion is that your actions are scummy.

Your vote on me, in reaction to an observation on you, is in fact "OMGUSy" as you put it.

I see you're getting more aggressive lol

Easy, Pooh Bear

[hohum]

The wiki is meant as a guide for newbies, not Mafia doctrine. Ultimately the wiki pages are maintained by users and some of them are misleading (including that one). Also having to resort to meta to support your own positions is scummy.

I take your refusal to answer my question as positive acknowledgement that you do indeed have a problem with me questioning your motives. +scum points for you too.

[hohum]

I'm going to go reread both of you in isolation now to see if I can get a better read on you since you're clearly as uncooperative as you say that I am. Who's the hypocrite now?

[AndyTony]

lol So you refusing to answer Alduskel's questions make you scummy as well? lmao

+scum points it is!

I'll add that to your list, which I will happily copy and paste so people can keep it fresh in their minds.

You're ignorant
You have a vote with no case/evidence
You have more than once displayed a desire to policy lynch
You have tried to suggest allignment
You are aggressive when against the wall and buckle under pressure
You want to waste our time (as you say)

You refuse to answer questions

@All
Hohum has done a poor read of this game and has missed where I illustrate my desire to clarify and answer questions (thus making his initial question empty and seemingly rhetorical) - - he seems lost in this line of thought lol

[hohum]

I answered his question, and kept answering his question for half a page. It's right there for everyone to see and judge for themselves.

[hohum]

either they'll agree with me or him, either way it's there.

[AndyTony]

You're ignorant
You have a vote with no case/evidence
You have more than once displayed a desire to policy lynch
You have tried to suggest allignment
You are aggressive when against the wall and buckle under pressure
You want to waste our time (as you say)
You refuse to answer questions

Hypocritical

@Hohum-
- Please outline your case and evidence supporting your vote
- Please show what evidence indicates scum

*If the reasons for the vote are based on gut feelings for gameplay, and you are once again falling into utility lynching mode -- I agree - - the town will definately decide lol*

[hohum]

I haven't refused to answer a single question. Here's why you're a tool:

I'm not pushing a case on you. In your own words:

Why do you assume that when I take notations of anything that it's bad?

Your own scum partner backed off of his position, yet you're running with it.

Calling Alduskkel and AndyTony now.

[hohum]

You're a hypocrite too bro, because you're doing some of the same things you're accusing me of and saying are scum tells.

[hohum]

[/quote] Please outline your case and evidence supporting your vote
- Please show what evidence indicates scum [/quote]

You're clearly the one not paying attention. WTF have I been talking about for the last 2 pages now?

• Your desire to push up the deadline, scummy
  
• Your accusations of hypocrisy, and your inability to recognize your own hypocrisy
  
• Your refusal to answer simple questions, no matter how stupid they may seem
  
• Your desire to be out of the spotlight

[hohum]

fucked up the quote tags but you get the idea.

[Alduskkel]

Fair enough. I don't have a problem with what you're doing but your timing is very suspect to me. You've had plenty of opportunities now to bitch about the vote, but you waited until I tried to do some scum hunting.

Painting me in a bad light isn't going to save your scum buddy.

1. I'm not painting you in a bad light.

2. As lame as an excuse as it might seem, I only just realized that you hadn't explained your vote on me.

like a little child.

Are you having difficulties with that hohum? Are there other games you would be more interested in playing? Twister is all kinds of fun.

Since you can't answer valid questions from other people while you are waiting for an answer from another player - - are you trying to say you are only capable of doing one thing at a time in this game? You can't multi task like the rest of us or hold more than one conversation? Perhaps Twister is a poor choice. Maybe a game with less responsibility will do...

So you're camping a vote and are further ignorant.

lol you're entertaining (not a compliment)

You're ignorant

Do look up the details on "OMGUS" hohum, I was going to suggest "Scrabble" to you in lue of "Twister" but now it seems your just as irresponsible with letters and words.

Now answer my question, dickweed.

Yes, taking this game another notch down in the Civility ladder is just the thing this game needs!

Your own scum partner backed off of his position, yet you're running with it.

Let me state this CLEARLY:

I have never, ever, accused hohum of being scum in this game. Do an isolation read of my posts. Give me one instance. I DID note some scummy things from him in my first post, but I did not (and still do not) call him scum. Stop saying that I called you scum, hohum.

Calling Alduskkel and AndyTony now.

I'm afraid not.

[AndyTony]

Please outline your case and evidence supporting your vote
- Please show what evidence indicates scum [/quote]

You're clearly the one not paying attention. WTF have I been talking about for the last 2 pages now?

• Your desire to push up the deadline, scummy
  
• Your accusations of hypocrisy, and your inability to recognize your own hypocrisy
  
• Your refusal to answer simple questions, no matter how stupid they may seem
  
• Your desire to be out of the spotlight

[/quote]

Ladies and Gentlemen, an example of a hohum case.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hohum - I've made obdervations on you, not a case. I've called Ceph scum and he has my vote.

and it looks like you didn't clear thins up for Alduskel after all....

[hohum]

yeah just keep repeating the same shit over and over again bro. Maybe the more you say it the truer it becomes. Here, let me try that:

It's raining strippers!

Nothing yet?

Let me try that again

It's raining strippers!

It's raining strippers!

It's raining strippers!

It's raining strippers!

Still nothing.

Here's the crux of the situation:

I answered his question, and kept answering his question for half a page. It's right there for everyone to see and judge for themselves.

I can't help it that neither of you like my justification for the vote. I vote the way I vote because I believe it assists me in scum hunting. You believe differently. This boils down to a game theory debate. I'm not going to change my mind and you aren't going to change yours.

Keep after me the way you are though and it looks like you're trying to contrive a case. Bad, scum! Bad! If I had a newspaper I'd swat you on the nose right now.

[Alduskkel]

hohum, how did your vote for me assist you in scum hunting?

Also, it would be bad if it rained strippers.

[hohum]

that's pretty funny.

See? Humor is a much better way to diffuse people than acting like a douchebag (*cough*andytony*cough*)

It helped me because it generated some conversation. Anything which helps me get a better read on you, or anyone else is productive -- even if it isn't readily apparent why I did it.

[hohum]

Incidentally I would have removed the vote eventually.

I don't REALLY think you're scum, though you do stand out a bit in my notes at the moment mainly because of your reactions.

AndyTony on the other hand is obvscum, and I'm satisfied with my vote for the day.

Moar andytony lynching, please!

[Zer0ph34r]

Hohum & Alduskel, it's like watching me argue with myself.

[hohum]

Interesting that you picked Alduskel, when AndyTony clearly interests me more.

I don't know what to make of that yet but it does seem noteworthy.

[Alduskkel]

Hohum & Alduskel, it's like watching me argue with myself.

How is it anything like that?

[The Replacement]

I am happy with my vote on Khamisa and I think this is a bunch of circular arguing going on between you three that isn't actually getting us anywhere but is more of a distaraction than anything else. It provides a very nice blanket for scum to just not post while you are all going around preoccupied with pointing fingers at each other for nonsense.

[Alduskkel]

1. How is the arguing circular?
2. How is the argument between AT/hohum/me nonsense?
3. How have I been pointing fingers at AT and/or hohum?

[AndyTony]

I think I've made sound observations. I don't find it useless "arguing"