Open 144 - Near-Vanilla - GAME OVER!

[Zer0ph34r]

He is my fucking brother. Cannot provide ACTUAL proof, except for asking him yourself, he would have no reason to lie. And besides, that has like nothing to do with anything. This much attention on that vote could be in good use.

[hohum]

why is a sibling claim relevant to the game anyways?

Nothing to see here... Move along... Move along...

[Alduskkel]

^Well, it is relevant for how Zer0 got his meta information on dejkha.

[hohum]

not really. It's no different than playing with someone a lot. It gives him some fresh insight, that's all. If they were actually talking about the game then I'd be concerned.

I'd like to remind you that dejkha is no longer in this game so concentrating on this is useless to progress.

I think there's a plateu ahead. Whether it's a week or three weeks, the topic for discussion is Ceph and Khamisa.

You're looking for an excuse to lurk and your focus is too narrow.

[AndyTony]

@hohum- You're manufacturing conclusions based on an attempt to judge my state of mind (poorly). I said there would be a plateu, not a stalemate. There will be no rising action or development - - only a group of people, with the same topics at hand. "Zero, Ceph, Khamisa".


I see no new evidence, and the same suspects are being talked about -- find another angle or don't waste my time.



@Lobstermania - you've posted your observations, what does that do for your vote?

[hohum]

I'll wasste all the time I want. As you pointed out not much is going on right now. Discussion is a good thing.

Do you have a problem with me questioning your motives for requesting the deadline get pushed up?

[Alduskkel]

hohum, you still haven't justified your vote for me.

[hohum]

hohum, you still haven't justified your vote for me.

Sure I did. You just don't LIKE what I had to say.

[Alduskkel]

You haven't given any reasons why I'm scummy; you're voting for me because you don't like my play, which I've already explained, not to mention the fact that your current reason doesn't fall under the definition of "justified."

[hohum]

You haven't given any reasons why I'm scummy; you're voting for me because you don't like my play, which I've already explained,

not to mention the fact that your current reason doesn't fall under the definition of "justified."

As to the bolded part, you are correct.

As for the rest, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it.

[Alduskkel]

So are you trying to get me policy lynched?

[hohum]

I'm not trying to do anything right now besides get some information out of andytony. Now piss off.

[Alduskkel]

Well, if you're not trying to get me policy lynched, and you're not trying to get me lynched because you think I'm scummy, then what on earth are you trying to do by voting for me?

[hohum]

Why are you being so defensive? You're nowhere near lynch and I don't see anyone rushing to wagon you.

[Alduskkel]

Why don't you answer my question?

[hohum]

I'll camp my vote where ever I want. That's why.

Why don't YOU answer MINE? It wasn't rhetorical.

[Alduskkel]

Why are you being so defensive?

I'm not being defensive, I'm questioning your vote on me, which I think is ridiculous.

Also, I won't take "just because" as an answer. Either you want me lynched or you don't. If you don't, then unvote. If you do, explain yourself.

[hohum]

I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. You're an idiot.

I'm going to sit here and wait for an answer from andytony. Take it for what you will, but I'm not going to remove my vote, and I'm not going to indulge your pestilence any longer.

[Alduskkel]

Your question dodging is noted.

[hohum]

Your defensiveness-which-borders-on-narcissism is noted. Keep pushing a case on me. It isn't going to go well for you when I flip and it's your fault because you got me lynched.

[Alduskkel]

I'm not pushing a case on you. In your own words:

Why do you assume that when I take notations of anything that it's bad?

[hohum]

Fair enough. I don't have a problem with what you're doing but your timing is very suspect to me. You've had plenty of opportunities now to bitch about the vote, but you waited until I tried to do some scum hunting.

Painting me in a bad light isn't going to save your scum buddy.

[AndyTony]

@hohum.

Once again, I'm seeing you being hypocritical, and aggressive like a little child.

Please refrain from that, people are more than happy to be civil.

I'm not going to sit here and argue with you. You're an idiot.

I'm going to sit here and wait for an answer from andytony. Take it for what you will, but I'm not going to remove my vote, and I'm not going to indulge your pestilence any longer.

You seem to indeed, want to lynch him based on policy (seeing as you refuse to post any evidence suggesting he is scum, and are quoted as agreeing your vote is on him based on gameplay...)

He has valid points being raised with you and you are being ignorant to that.

Your reason for this is to wait for me to answer a question.

Your question was whether I have a problem with you asking questions. (I wouldn't throw around the word "idiot" so loosely after that, hohum).

Doesn't seem like an important question, does it? Is it worth ignoring other people?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You don't respond well to people calling out your poor gameplay. You have a vote on a player and are incapable of providing evidence of them being scum. That's your JOB in this game. Are you having difficulties with that hohum? Are there other games you would be more interested in playing? Twister is all kinds of fun.

Since you can't answer valid questions from other people while you are waiting for an answer from another player - - are you trying to say you are only capable of doing one thing at a time in this game? You can't multi task like the rest of us or hold more than one conversation? Perhaps Twister is a poor choice. Maybe a game with less responsibility will do...

I'll camp my vote where ever I want. That's why.

Why don't YOU answer MINE? It wasn't rhetorical.

So you're camping a vote and are further ignorant.

And it seems one sided.

@All
In your opinion. When a player refuses to answer questions, co-operate, or meet other players on even ground in civility - - and they demand you answer their questions in light of this - - - is that very town?

Hm. A player that demands everyone tends to his every useless question, yet ignores what is substantially asked of him, and gets violent when challeneged.....do you have something to hide hohum? You know who else have things to hide? Scum....
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your defensiveness-which-borders-on-narcissism is noted. Keep pushing a case on me. It isn't going to go well for you

when I flip and it's your fault because you got me lynched.

Are you trying to suggest your allignment here?

Do you have a problem with a player defending himself when there is a vote on his life and no evidence to back it up?

lol you're entertaining (not a compliment)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You're ignorant
You have a vote with no case/evidence
You have more than once displayed a desire to policy lynch
You have tried to suggest allignment
You are aggressive when against the wall and buckle under pressure
You want to waste our time (as you say)

Well. Along with seeming scummy, hohum, you're indeed wasting out time lol

[hohum]

It is an important question. Now answer it.

[hohum]

Unvote, Vote AndyTony

Your reaction is a little OMGUSy.