The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

Stephoscope · Post Post #2800 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:17 am

I don't have anything.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2801 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:19 am

Claim Tally

(don't have it)
Lamont
Pyro
Stepho

ZazieR · Post Post #2802 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:22 am

I don''t have it.

Claim Tally

(don''t have it)
Lamont
Pyro
Stepho
Zazie
Setael

Add yourself to the list if you claim you don''t have it.

populartajo · Post Post #2803 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:26 am

As usual, I had a very busy and alcoholic weekend. Ill post as soon as I get out of my office. Tonight.

dramonic · Post Post #2804 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:21 am

Claim Tally

(don''t have it)
Lamont
Pyro
Stepho
Zazie
Setael
Dram

populartajo · Post Post #2805 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:23 am

Err. What is the point of this?

Do you think someone will admit havin the doll?

populartajo · Post Post #2806 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:23 am

Wait. Maybe this does have a point.

I dont have it.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2807 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:37 am

dramonic wrote:
Claim Tally
(don''t have it)
Lamont
Pyro
Stepho
Zazie
Setael
Dram
Tajo

dramonic · Post Post #2808 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:53 am

for what the list is worth, it'll show us who is lurking as opposed to who has the doll or matches <<

hohum · Post Post #2809 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:22 am

I'll catch up later tonight.

ZazieR · Post Post #2810 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:31 am

Can you already tell us if you have received the matches?

Pyromaniac · Post Post #2811 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:45 am

He could but he won't. >_> <_< ˚–˚

hohum · Post Post #2812 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 7:41 pm

Pyromaniac wrote:He could but he won't. >_> <_< ˚–˚

You're treading a fine line there scum.

ZazieR wrote: Can you already tell us if you have received the matches?

I saw that request a few pages back. I'm waiting for the mod to tell me what (if anything) I have in inventory. As soon as I find out I'll let you know.

In other news, why haven't we lynched pyro yet?

ZazieR · Post Post #2813 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:01 pm

Hohum wrote:In other news, why haven't we lynched pyro yet?

Because it''s very likely that we''ve caught fake-claiming scum.
And because the lynches haven''t worked out due to the discussion of the items each time.

Can you show us a case when you''re done reading?

ZazieR · Post Post #2814 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:04 pm

ZazieR wrote:
Setael
, this

You still haven''t responded.

ZazieR · Post Post #2815 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:05 pm

Naomi

, this

Also,

Vote Naomi

Devestation · Post Post #2816 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:22 pm

I don't have the matches.

hohum · Post Post #2817 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:22 pm

This game has more than doubled in size since Elmo took my role over originally. Would you mind giving me a short recap as to this fake-claiming scum thing? It would really save me a hell of a lot of trouble.

ZazieR · Post Post #2818 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:23 pm

Claim Tally

(don''t have it)
Lamont
Pyro
Stepho
Zazie
Setael
Dram
Tajo
Deves

ZazieR · Post Post #2819 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:31 pm

For

Hohum

Stepho''s claim:

For the love of God...

I am Janine. I am an investigative reporter, and am Innocent.

I can check one player each night, and learn his or her role and alignment.

I investigated Naomi last night. Her roleclaim was legitimate. She is Trilby.

Please protect me tonight.

Finally, he claims his results:

I SERIOUSLY don't know how to answer this. I have already shared what I learned about Naomi. IF I HAD TO GUESS RIGHT NOW, I would say that her role is Trilby, her alignment is Innocent and/or Pro-Town, and her flavor is (note these exact words, because Naomi should be able to confirm) "Infamous gentleman thief". But, AGAIN, this was not spelled out for me in the PM. I have done the best I can.

Later, he stated that the PM he claimed to have received said ''anti-spirit'', which then became Naomi''s allignment.
He also has claimed to be Innocent. And his role PM mentioned ''and fellow Innocents'' according to him.

The lies:
-Innocent isn''t allignment. When this was pointed out, it got changed to ''anti-spirit''. Also, in this game, it''s also very strange if somebody''s allignment would be ''pro-town''.
-Naomi states that her role is ''gentelman thief'', which is what Stepho claimed before changing it to ''infamous gentleman thief''
-No role PM so far claimed has ''an fellow Innocents''. All the others have claimed ''and fellow humans''.

This is basically it regarding Stepho.

ZazieR · Post Post #2820 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:34 pm

For

Hohum

Naomi claimed to be Trilby at the end of day 1. Her first claim was that she can''t be killed. Later, after Amished has asked some questions, she adds to be a 1-shot cop.
So far, she has refused to give flavour. I hope she''ll do so pretty soon.
Also, she didn''t use her 1-shot N1. She did so N2 on a player who was seen as very likely town after his claim and flavour claim (Deves). She thought the same. This still needs to be explained.

ZazieR · Post Post #2821 (ISO) » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:36 pm

Amished

You''ve claimed to be a ''Creature of Good Will''. So can you explain then to me why you think your role would then contain ''fellow humans''?

Pyromaniac · Post Post #2822 (ISO) » Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:43 am

Naomi also said that it was stepho or deves.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2823 (ISO) » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:26 am

Mod Votecount please

Ok so lets make a list of people that haven't claimed about the doll:

Rocka, Naomi, Tajo, Sironi, Zwet, Amished

ZazieR · Post Post #2824 (ISO) » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:39 am

Tajo claimed, and Zwet and Sironi are V/LA.
Has Hohum claimed then if he has it?