Hmm. Your certainty gives me pause.Herodotus wrote:Pressure? I want this to be a lynch wagon. Do you, or do you not?Papa Zito wrote:Anyway,unvote; vote: Raivann. Pressure produces results.
I'm definitely not a proponent of quick days.
I meant that we want to keep the choosen one alive...not people that are not the choosen one. I was unclear there.TDC wrote:Why would we want to keep someone alive who we think is not the Chosen?MiteyMouse wrote:I've been thinking about what Zorblag said and the connections that we all have had to each other before this game. It's very likely that one of us that have played a lot with others in this game are probably not the choosen one. That might narrow it down a bit. As, we want to keep that person alive....having them alive is a big asset to us.
I'd pick:Zorblag wrote:Actually, another question for everyone in the game: If you had to choose any 4 of the following players to exclude as the chosen who would you pick and why?
Zorblag...should this worry me? Let me explain to everyone else here what I mean. In Newbie 749, the Troll was replaced in and he was Scum with Albert B Rampage. He asked almost the same question to Albert who, was his Scum partner. He explained it in his post game analysis as a way to get a message to Albert. I'm not ready to vote for you yet Zorblag but, it is noted!Zorblag wrote:Herodotus, do you have any experience with Papa Zito? Same question in reverse to Papa Zito.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
I played in 142 and hohum did set up quick topics for us...Zorblag wrote:Ah, and it looks like hohum did set up Quicktopics for pairs in Open 142. Based on that (well, and rule 11) I would expect that the scum have a Quicktopic that replacements can look at.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
Would you like it as much if it was a guy?MM wrote:Afatchic...random here but, she stands out for me...I've seen her around and love her name!
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 94#1756994afatchic wrote:Can someone please present to me the case against Raivann, since i am really not seeing it.
So then Raivann is scum for defending Ash?Herodotus wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 94#1756994afatchic wrote:Can someone please present to me the case against Raivann, since i am really not seeing it.
The response to PZ is a possible chainsaw defense. Zito's accusation was pretty minor, and clearly directed at Ash. Nuwen jumped in to answer it for him and stop the line of discussion before Ash could make a slip.
Post 20 doesn't look very good either.
MiteyMouse wrote:Oh my...I'm sorry! I would still like it but, not as much...hehehe!afatchic wrote:Would you like it as much if it was a guy?MM wrote:Afatchic...random here but, she stands out for me...I've seen her around and love her name!
I don't see anything that would suggest he replaced out because he was scum.BloodCovenent wrote:KubrickTDC wrote:Why's that specifically directed at me?
Can you post the link to that game?
I don't think a vote that is declared to be for pressure, actually produces pressure.Papa Zito wrote:Anyway,unvote; vote: Raivann. Pressure produces results.
Second slip of that kind. Does this happen often to you?Zorblag wrote:I meant we as a game there.
afatchic wrote:I didn't read rule 11, and i was thinking 2 scum= no QT thread.
I'm not liking this "look, I must be town, I have no idea about things scum would know" theme you've going there.afatchic wrote:I didn't read the scum Pm's on the first page, and didn't realize they knew who the Chosen 1 was until Papa Zito just pointed it out.
You do realize that this line of thought only makes sense if Ash is scum?Herodotus wrote:Nuwen jumped in to answer it for him and stop the line of discussion before Ash could make a slip.
Okay, next time i won't explain my actions.TDC wrote:I'm not liking this "look, I must be town, I have no idea about things scum would know" theme you've going there.
I'm surprised no one corrected Nuwen on this. Archon was scum in the first of those games (which also had Ash and BC in it,) and a jester in the other. This meta argument was based on false data.
Zorblag wrote:Herodotus, do you have any experience with Papa Zito? Same question in reverse to Papa Zito.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
I'm not quite sure what to make of this but, as I explained before Zorblag left messages to his partner in a previous game that we played together in. I'm just wondering if he and Papa are sending messages to each other here? It just seems odd that Papa would throw that in. Maybe it's a Scum code?Papa Zito wrote:i think Herodotus is a pretty cool guy. eh hunts the scum and doesn't afraid of anything.
Oh, I see, you're cuddling with him? I think I'm happy with my vote right now!Papa Zito wrote:The "pretty cool guy... doesn't afraid of anything" is a meme, Mitey. I'm very much in favor of Ash/Raivann(Nuwen) as our scum, and Herodotus seems to be thinking along the same lines.
I did indeed mention it. right here.Herodotus wrote:I'm surprised no one corrected Nuwen on this. Archon was scum in the first of those games (which also had Ash and BC in it,) and a jester in the other. This meta argument was based on false data.
I'm not liking your play style MM. You say you're happy with your vote. But that was your RVS vote, do you have any case on Papa Zito? Do you have a gut read on anyone else? Do you have suspicions on anyone else? I've said this once, right after you went V/LA, and i'm hereby requesting your opinion on the matter.MiteyMouse wrote:Oh, I see, you're cuddling with him? I think I'm happy with my vote right now!Papa Zito wrote:The "pretty cool guy... doesn't afraid of anything" is a meme, Mitey. I'm very much in favor of Ash/Raivann(Nuwen) as our scum, and Herodotus seems to be thinking along the same lines.
Now, i have not added your more recent posts, however, none of them seem to have much value to them at the moment.BloodCovenent wrote:
Another thing that stood out to me is MightyMouse. We're four, now five(no nine)pages into the game, and you mentioned one thing only, from page three. Could we get some content? It seems like all your doing is IIOA. Here, here, here, Well... no content here, and here. When you're going to be V/LA, at least make a post where you catch up. You haven't done so yet. You have given us practically nothing to work with right now.
You don't like my playstyle...that is fine. Would you like it better if I took off my random vote and revoted Papa? Just because it wa a random vote does not mean that I cannot vote for that person later on in the game...BloodCovenent wrote:I'm not liking your play style MM. You say you're happy with your vote. But that was your RVS vote, do you have any case on Papa Zito? Do you have a gut read on anyone else? Do you have suspicions on anyone else? I've said this once, right after you went V/LA, and i'm hereby requesting your opinion on the matter.MiteyMouse wrote:Oh, I see, you're cuddling with him? I think I'm happy with my vote right now!Papa Zito wrote:The "pretty cool guy... doesn't afraid of anything" is a meme, Mitey. I'm very much in favor of Ash/Raivann(Nuwen) as our scum, and Herodotus seems to be thinking along the same lines.Now, i have not added your more recent posts, however, none of them seem to have much value to them at the moment.BloodCovenent wrote:
Another thing that stood out to me is MightyMouse. We're four, now five(no nine)pages into the game, and you mentioned one thing only, from page three. Could we get some content? It seems like all your doing is IIOA. Here, here, here, Well... no content here, and here. When you're going to be V/LA, at least make a post where you catch up. You haven't done so yet. You have given us practically nothing to work with right now.
I should have been straightforward and said posting content.MiteyMouse wrote: You don't like my playstyle...that is fine.
True, but you have absolutely no case on said player. Sure, you would have had the time to concoct one.MiteyMouse wrote:
Would you like it better if I took off my random vote and revoted Papa? Just because it wa a random vote does not mean that I cannot vote for that person later on in the game...
Where have you voiced your suspicions? Was it post 214, where you suspect PZ and Zor of sending messages back and forth to each other? Or is it 216 where you suggest PZ with buddying with someone? Your content and responses are so vague that it's hard to pick up anything from you at all. Your answers and responses are very superficial, leading me to believe that you are trying to hide something, and not be put in the limelight.MiteyMouse wrote: I have voiced my suspicions...I have not had a chance to build full cases yet but, I have said at least twice that I suspect Zorblag and now Papa Zito as well. Is that not good enough for you or are you not reading my posts? You do say that you haven't taken the recent one's into account...have you read them?
worth reading, i guess. You have posted five times since I confronted you again.MiteyMouse wrote: And yes, we are at 9 pages...I left at the start of page 5 and posted on page 9...the pages that did not have me posting were when I was away. I always have trouble at the start of games and, I did not post much but, I'd like to think that what I have posted since I got back is at the very least worth reading.
There's something fishy with this.Papa Zito wrote:Hmm. Your certainty gives me pause.Herodotus wrote:Pressure? I want this to be a lynch wagon. Do you, or do you not?Papa Zito wrote:Anyway,unvote; vote: Raivann. Pressure produces results.
I'm definitely not a proponent of quick days.
I noticed that before, then forgot.I did indeed mention it. right here.