populartajo wrote:
No.
I think its pretty clear how I play this game. Not all townies in this game are excellent scumhunters or excellent debaters. But there is something that cant be faked. Yes (its starting to get repetitive) the motivation to do things.
Veerus and paperpeguin both proposed things that at first glance look scummy but as you deeply analyse them, they become just bad ideas.
Ill give you something to analyse. Besides your veerus hate, what else have you actually done in this game?
And that's where I disagree with you. I may be repeating myself as much as you do, but I fail to see any town motivation in veerus' plan. Now, let's take a look why you see a town motivation:
populartajo wrote:
veerus wrote:Upon re-reading the infected role, do the scum
have
to infect someone at night? How do the previous theories hold up if the scum just let the town lynch each other without bothering to infect anyone?
I think it makes more sense to vote no-lynch and let the security guard & scientist roles shoot it out with the scum at night.
This way we don't risk accidentally lynching those roles and we don't force them to claim and out themselves either.
When you consider the fact that there are test subjects in the mix who may or may not be infected, I must say I like our chances.
unvote; vote: no lynch
There you go, the motivation at bold.
The bolded part is more or less something I would expect town not to say in a game like that. Which mafia game does not bear the chance of "accidently" lynching a Power Role? Day 1 is in no matter different then any other Mafia Game - in fact, it's the only Day that gives us the oppurtunity of collecting information with the original alignments. And while NL won't "force a PR to claim", it is perfect for scum as they won't be in need to avoid slipping. This whole plan favors scum so much more then it would be beneficial for town. You get it as town-motivated - fine, but I don't. And I will push a lynch on someone who is sending scum vibes.
I already said that it's something different with PP's plan, and I understand your approach. Still, I am not voting veerus for his plan alone as you assume, but also for his contradictive behavior, which is exactly what I think you are ignoring. I'm not an excellent scumhunter nor debater myself, as you call it, but at least I tried.
As for what else I've done: I contributed to the game mechanics discussion, commented on FA vs PP. And I thought about how much truth is in what PP said here:
PaperPenguin wrote:Shotty to the Body wrote:I agree, where is the rest of the town? =P
Trying as hard as possible not to get lynched. This game is strange in that people want to be NKed.
I'm afraid the truth isn't that far away. I admit I have difficulties reading the others. We're all either circling around the same "You're scum" - "NO U" - not just us two, but the others as well. I think I'll have better insight when I see who gets lynched and who'll die at night.
But this is what I've got so far:
FA: Already commented on him. Possible scum.
Mokina: still neutral, but: With the votes spread evenly, this gives a great oppurtunity to get things going with voting the players she finds scummy. Why?
Malthusis: Likely scum. I didn't realize that he didn't do much either. He's totally flying under the radar. Almost no content, just a few tiny posts about FA. But, not voting, not even FA. I could go with a malthusis lynch if veerus gets no majority.
BM: I did get some town vibes from him in the early stage, but I don't like his abscence. Will have better insight after he posted.
Kise: Considering FA possible scum with PP more likely town, Kise is town.
charter: Neutral. I think he's on the wrong track with Kise, but it looks genuine. What I don't like about charter are his comments about veerus (obviously).
Kelly Chen: Can't read her that good, but I like her attention on malthusis. IIRC, she's the only one (or did anyone else point him out?). So I'd say rather town.
Tajo: I'd see him rather leaning town, but: if veerus somehow turns to be town, and PP/Kise too, he'd have a pretty nice position as scum defending those two.
Shotty: Neutral, with rather town. Of course I like his vote on veerus, but I got some mixed vibes from him, especially over why he unvoted BM.
KKN: neutral. I don't agree with what he said about PP's plan; I don't agree with "town lists hurt town". But I can see why he questions Tajo; I think both are either misunderstanding each other. Tajo makes a good point with this, though:
populartajo wrote:
KNK wrote:Do I think PP is scum? He wasn't in the game long enough for me to say
Tell me then why fallen angel thought it deserved a vote.