The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2400 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:37 pm

Oh crap. I think we are being totally mind screwed.

Stephoscope · Post Post #2401 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:50 pm

I have posted everything I learned about Naomi.

If I were faking, I'm sure she'd come by and invalidate my claim. As it is, I'm just hoping she returns...

Elmo · Post Post #2402 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:51 pm

o_O Interesting.

Anyway, I (personally) don't think Stepho is being caught fakeclaiming here. I actually don't think he would be. On that basis, I dislike a Stepho lynch today.

I am good with killing almost anyone who hasn't been notably vocal today. Hint, hint.

dramonic · Post Post #2403 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:54 pm

So you could consider unvoting my shiny wagon, Elmo :3

I know I'm at L-7 or something, but considering we agreed to lynch the one with the highest vote count when the deadline becomes too close... yeah <<

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2404 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 4:55 pm

the Bastard Mod wrote:13. There will be crazy shit, descriptions of unpleasant actions, and things you may well not understand at all in this game. It is not intended to be particularly fair, nice, or easy for the town/innocents.
You may be required to actually think, instead of playing follow the *
insert role/s here
*
Get used to it. ithurtsithurtsirthurts

Devestation · Post Post #2405 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:18 pm

*SIGH*

I've only pointed that out... repeatedly... all game

Stephoscope · Post Post #2406 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:30 pm

Devestation wrote:*SIGH*

I've only pointed that out... repeatedly... all game

I think you're town now...sorry for my trying to lynch you...and I now want a lynch of someone who hasn't claimed and seems unaware of the various pro-town PMs.

I'll have more tomorrow.

Naomi_Saotome · Post Post #2407 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:46 pm

In regards to post:
2405
I don't think you're the only one who has...

ZazieR wrote:
Naomi
, please respond to Stepho''s claim.

Elmo
, if possible, could you a full role PM claim? You''re one of the two reasons as of now why I''m not voting him.

Sorry I didn't respond earlier... it's been a crazy week for me.

As I said before, I'm Trilby,

ZazieR wrote:
Naomi
, please respond to Stepho''s claim.

Elmo
, if possible, could you a full role PM claim? You''re one of the two reasons as of now why I''m not voting him.

Sorry I didn't respond earlier... it's been a crazy week for me.

As I said before, I'm Trilby, gentalman theif...
My pm says something along these lines: You are protected from malignant beings in the house.... You win when threats to the humans are eliminated

Elmo · Post Post #2408 (ISO) » Fri Jul 03, 2009 5:51 pm

unvote, vote Rockatansky

anyway.

ZazieR · Post Post #2409 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:37 am

I'm fairly positive that Stepho is fake-claiming. From the rules:

2b. During the night,
Good
and Evil specials have 3 days in real-time to PM me with their actions and targets, or simply to confirm that they are not using their ability. After three days, anyone who has not PM'd is considered to have chosen not to act, and the game continues.

From Post 2370, in which the mod answers my question:

This game does not only show alignment. To clarify - in this game,
an Innocent
is someone entirely uninvolved in the struggle between any
Good faction/s
and any Evil faction/s, and
should be considered the equivalent of a Vanillager
. Alignments are denoted by coloration.

ZazieR · Post Post #2410 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:38 am

Xtoxm wrote:Also, that plus what Amished said earlier makes me worried we have a Cult mechanic in this game.

Can you elaborate?

ZazieR · Post Post #2411 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:41 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Xtoxm wrote:So, can we lynch scum yet?

Unvote Vote Steph
Please explain this. This appears to be an irresponsible vote with only 5 days left, but when you factor in that he is a claimed town PR it becomes actually scummy...

Right now, it's less than 3 days.
Also, it's a good vote.

Xtoxm · Post Post #2412 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:42 am

We have Evil and Good, and then a load of innocents, that seem like a bit on the side. Amished made a comment about being aware "People will start turning".

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2413 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:43 am

ZazieR wrote:
Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Xtoxm wrote:So, can we lynch scum yet?

Unvote Vote Steph
Please explain this. This appears to be an irresponsible vote with only 5 days left, but when you factor in that he is a claimed town PR it becomes actually scummy...
Right now, it's less than 3 days.
Also, it's a good vote.

No the deadline is July 8th.

ZazieR · Post Post #2414 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:43 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
I really don't know what this entails or how I can usefully do this without being modkilled. I will say that I find this
Stephoscope wrote:
I wish to find anyone who would do harm to me "
and fellow Innocents
".
very interesting, on reflection.
This is looking worse and worse for Stepho...

Finally this gets noted

ZazieR · Post Post #2415 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:45 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
ZazieR wrote:
Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Xtoxm wrote:So, can we lynch scum yet?

Unvote Vote Steph
Please explain this. This appears to be an irresponsible vote with only 5 days left, but when you factor in that he is a claimed town PR it becomes actually scummy...
Right now, it's less than 3 days.
Also, it's a good vote.
No the deadline is July 8th.

Noon GMT.
It's almost 5 PM GMT+2 --> 3 PM GMT
So a bit less than 4 days

Mod said something different a moment ago.

Xtoxm · Post Post #2416 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:46 am

The deadline shouldn't matter. Steph is caught in a lie.

ZazieR · Post Post #2417 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:47 am

Elmo wrote:Like I said, I'm frazzled, but I don't really see how Stepho is obvscum although that may well simply be me missing it at this point. Please understand that Innocent being a role does not mean it is not also an alignment, and that if Innocent is not an alignment we have no power roles and e.g. Amished should be next in line for the chop. And that doesn't sound right to me, quite possibly the majority of the claims are scum but I seriously doubt all of them are. I know I'll kick myself if Stepho is scum (and this Innocent business has zero capability to clear him) but I'm not 100% putting my vote there right now.

Naomi is also still here as claimed powerrole.
Also, as I have already pointed out, Amished claimed a player from the game. However, after having checked the wiki, the name is wrong due to Amished's claimed flavour. He claimed the father, while the claimed flavour fits the son.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2418 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:49 am

I'm serious if Stepho is scum he needs to get a golden scummy award for his play concerning Naomi. I won't vote him and I believe him.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2419 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:50 am

ZazieR wrote:
Elmo wrote:Like I said, I'm frazzled, but I don't really see how Stepho is obvscum although that may well simply be me missing it at this point. Please understand that Innocent being a role does not mean it is not also an alignment, and that if Innocent is not an alignment we have no power roles and e.g. Amished should be next in line for the chop. And that doesn't sound right to me, quite possibly the majority of the claims are scum but I seriously doubt all of them are. I know I'll kick myself if Stepho is scum (and this Innocent business has zero capability to clear him) but I'm not 100% putting my vote there right now.
Naomi is also still here as claimed powerrole.
Also, as I have already pointed out, Amished claimed a player from the game. However, after having checked the wiki, the name is wrong due to Amished's claimed flavour. He claimed the father, while the claimed flavour fits the son.

Actually he used the term "gatekeeper" when the term was supposed to be something else right?

ZazieR · Post Post #2420 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:50 am

Stepho wrote:I SERIOUSLY don't know how to answer this. I have already shared what I learned about Naomi. IF I HAD TO GUESS RIGHT NOW, I would say that her role is Trilby,
her alignment is Innocent and/or Pro-Town
, and her flavor is (note these exact words, because Naomi should be able to confirm) "Infamous gentleman thief". But, AGAIN, this was not spelled out for me in the PM. I have done the best I can.

Please explain the bolded as you've claimed to have received her allignment. So the 'and/or' doesn't fit if this is true.

ZazieR · Post Post #2421 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:51 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
ZazieR wrote:
Elmo wrote:Like I said, I'm frazzled, but I don't really see how Stepho is obvscum although that may well simply be me missing it at this point. Please understand that Innocent being a role does not mean it is not also an alignment, and that if Innocent is not an alignment we have no power roles and e.g. Amished should be next in line for the chop. And that doesn't sound right to me, quite possibly the majority of the claims are scum but I seriously doubt all of them are. I know I'll kick myself if Stepho is scum (and this Innocent business has zero capability to clear him) but I'm not 100% putting my vote there right now.
Naomi is also still here as claimed powerrole.
Also, as I have already pointed out, Amished claimed a player from the game. However, after having checked the wiki, the name is wrong due to Amished's claimed flavour. He claimed the father, while the claimed flavour fits the son.
Actually he used the term "gatekeeper" when the term was supposed to be something else right?

I don't know what he meant with it. Which is why I asked him to explain it. But he hasn't showed up ever since I got here.

ZazieR · Post Post #2422 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:51 am

Stephoscope wrote:EBWOP: The words "Anti-Spirit" are in my PM about Naomi. Not my role PM.

What does the PM say about it, and how come you came up with this much later after your claim?

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #2423 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:54 am

Right but remember the game history you quoted used a different term than "gatekeeper".

What if we are being mind screwed with scum being allowed to use "town-like-looking powers" and safeclaims and such? All this claiming left and right, I've never really seen a decent game go like this...

For Amish Ed's claim to be fake he would need to be scum with a townie-healing power...

I mean it just seems too far fetched.

ZazieR · Post Post #2424 (ISO) » Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:56 am

Naomi_Saotome wrote:In regards to post:
2405
I don't think you're the only one who has...

ZazieR wrote:
Naomi
, please respond to Stepho''s claim.

Elmo
, if possible, could you a full role PM claim? You''re one of the two reasons as of now why I''m not voting him.
Sorry I didn't respond earlier... it's been a crazy week for me.

As I said before, I'm Trilby,
ZazieR wrote:
Naomi
, please respond to Stepho''s claim.

Elmo
, if possible, could you a full role PM claim? You''re one of the two reasons as of now why I''m not voting him.
Sorry I didn't respond earlier... it's been a crazy week for me.

As I said before,
I'm Trilby, gentalman theif
...
My pm says something along these lines: You are protected from malignant beings in the house.... You win when threats to the humans are eliminated

*pat, pat*
Don't worry. The lynch won't hurt much. Next time, you should read each post from Stepho before commenting. Here, he claimed indeed gentelman thief. Next post, it was 'infamous gentleman thief'. Please explain why you claimed gentelman thief, while according to Stepho, this isn't correct.

Also, does your role PM state your allignment? If so, what is it?