Webcomic Wars Mafia: D7- Be Thankful I'm Not The Author

[Lamont_Cranston]

Vino (3): Korlash, roflcopter, populartajo

The wagon was started by fishy. All three listed above just wagoned with no real reason. Only one of them named two people they would vote which would be Tajo.

I also find it interesting that both Korlash & Tajo are on the same wagon after all that banter back and forth. Could be early D1 scum bussing.

Vote Korlash

[Fishythefish]

Fishy argues that I am trying to look nonchalant, which (not that I agree with it) is a reasonable argument, but not in light of the fact that he seemed to be at my teeth from the get-go. I don't like any of those. I'd like them to explain themselves.

Not much to explain for me. I placed an almost random vote, which at one point got slightly less random. Something more compelling has come up, and I've taken it away.

[Empking]

Vote: LC

LC seems to me, to be too quick to judge and his reaction gto Tar makes me think he'll attack anything.

How do you mean? It looked like he was just trying to respond to points being raised against him.

Its not what you do its how you do it.

LC: Why do you post one post after another?

[roflcopter]

i'll be back after the fourth of july weekend

[hasdgfas]

Post 146 by Vino: I'm not sure why you're voting for SensFan here? at all?

Because I want to. I sense a subtle defense of SensFan from you, what's the deal?

I want to know why you're voting someone. I'm not trying to defend him because I seriously don't understand the reasons you're voting for him.

Not to mention, the entire first part of this post is probably the scummiest thing this game. Care about what you say beacuse the other players do, and will attack you for it. You can't just dismiss them by saying "everyone finds me scummy all the time".

@L_C:

Did you elaborate at all on the post where you said "Very interesting"? Because if so, I must've missed it. In addition, I don't recall seeing anything about how astoundingly bad your ad hom on tar was. That's seriously scummy dude.

@L_C 166:

I asked nicely the first time. Don't answer questions inside long quotes. Nobody wants to read that. It makes it much easier to quote everything if you quote what you want to answer and answer it there. I'm serious. Not to mention I can tell what's your current post as opposed to old posts.
Not to mention claiming something someone called you out on as a null tell? Seriously? First off, nulltells/towntells are not a good thing to be using. Second off, you can't claim something you said is a null tell after someone finds it scummy, especially without evidence. Have you done it as scum and town? Where? Do you have links?
Also, more ad hom, more "defense"


And Santos comes in with nothing again.


Re: LC's 174: He's really jumpy. I wonder why, with all the time he has for other posts, like responding to Tar, for instance, he doesn't take a couple minutes to make sure his vote is on the right person.
Re: LC's 175: Why is that so interesting? What does the banter about a previous game have to do with this one?

[Gorrad]

Vote Count brought to you by The Ninja Mafia. "A Legitimate Business Enterprise".

Lamont_Cranston (8): Tarhalindur, Percy, SerialClergyman, Slicey, SensFan, Mufasa, Empking, Fishythefish
Vino (2): roflcopter, populartajo
SensFan (2): Head_Honcho, Vino
Korlash (2): Delathi, Lamont_Cranston
Sironigous (1): Hasdgfas
roflcopter (1): The Silent Speaker
Hasdgfas (1): Qwints
Flameaxe (1): Timeater
SerialClergyman (1): ZazieR
Timeater (1): Tzeentch

Note Voting (5): Santos, Sironigous, xRECKONERx, Flameaxe, Korlash

With 25 alive, it's 13 to lynch.

[Korlash]

I hate statements like that one you gave because you are being wishy washy like anything. Any time you try to comment on an issue and can't tell me which side you're on, you are leaving yourself wiggle room so that if it later becomes an issue, you're able to fall back on whatever position is convinient. Either you're in favour of wagoning lurkers or your not - but if you bother to post about the issue, take a side so you can be held to it.

I did take a side on it. Just because I admit there are times when I feel differently does not change my original stance. Case in point, I am against voting lurkers, but will gladly vote anyone I think is an active lurker. Both are valid points situated around the same stance and I'll be held to both, even though to some people they seem contradictory and hypocritical.

The wagon was started by fishy. All three listed above just wagoned with no real reason. Only one of them named two people they would vote which would be Tajo.

I also find it interesting that both Korlash & Tajo are on the same wagon after all that banter back and forth. Could be early D1 scum bussing.

Vote Korlash

So you vote the one guy no longer on the wagon? Makes sense...

[Vino]

You may think the early-D1 stage is useless.
I find more scum through this phase than the rest put together.

I'd love to hear your strategies then, because I can personally never make heads or tails out of the first couple pages. I've read a lot of threads on this site and I can never find any patterns that let me discern motivations.

Anyhow to say I was so scummy with no reason so early in the game didn't make sense so I voted you.

To someone, I forget: It's not that I don't care about what I say. I just have given up trying not to look scummy. It's a tangent to this game though, I'll shut up about it.

Somebody please explain to me what a 1-2 mislynch is.

[SerialClergyman]

I take a 1-2 mislynch to mean that the scum agree with a wagon on a townie, get him lynched then on D2 immediately turn on whoever suggested the first wagon and get them lynched too. So it's possible that they in one pretty fluid motion could get two townies lynched.

If that's not what you were suggesting then please correct me.

[Santos]

Yeah, I really don't have much to say. I've got my web comic, and a hankering to put a vote on Lamont, but he's just so damned spastic it feels too much of a condemnation to lynch him because I get townie reads from him. On the flip side, his hyperactive posting could be a diversion for us to think he's a spastic townie instead of scum. If he's on quite a role of spamming the threads, then we cannot conclusively derive that he is always townie...but rather scum keeping up with his usual posting style.

At the end of the day, he would not be a bad choice if no one else seems more fit to eat rope today.

[Lamont_Cranston]

@L_C:

Did you elaborate at all on the post where you said "Very interesting"? Because if so, I must've missed it. In addition, I don't recall seeing anything about how astoundingly bad your ad hom on tar was. That's seriously scummy dude.

Yes.

1) I noted a possible theory (already stated elsewhere)

2) I insult bad arguments (already stated elsewhere) AND its not adhom.

[Lamont_Cranston]

The wagon was started by fishy. All three listed above just wagoned with no real reason. Only one of them named two people they would vote which would be Tajo.

I also find it interesting that both Korlash & Tajo are on the same wagon after all that banter back and forth. Could be early D1 scum bussing.

Vote Korlash

So you vote the one guy no longer on the wagon? Makes sense...

You're right. You were really only the first one on the wagon, admitted it was a random vote & unvoted.

That leaves:

Unvote, Vote Tajo

[SensFan]

Am I the only one noticing how LC is literally just voting anyone he possibly can, then moving on if it doesn't stick?

[Empking]

Santos: If you think he's town don't vote him.

[hasdgfas]

Am I the only one noticing how LC is literally just voting anyone he possibly can, then moving on if it doesn't stick?

Nope, I mentioned that earlier this page, although not in those words.

[Korlash]

Am I the only one noticing how LC is literally just voting anyone he possibly can, then moving on if it doesn't stick?

Define doesn't stick... His vote on me hardly had the time to apply the glue, let alone see if it would stick or not.

[Santos]

Santos: If you think he's town don't vote him.

But if he's a distraction?

[Lamont_Cranston]

Am I the only one noticing how LC is literally just voting anyone he possibly can, then moving on if it doesn't stick?

Yes. But I have behaved illogically. I have made mistakes with my votes and I only changed them because they lacked sound logic.

[Santos]

Lamont, what are your plans for this mafia?

[Lamont_Cranston]

Well I'd like some time to start playing better. I'm not used to making mistakes like this and such. Sort of off to a bad start I guess... 9.9

I think its reasonable to assume that there could be scum on the Vino wagon. I would suspect Rofl & Tajo more than Korlash.

So I think my vote is in the right place with Tajo atm.

[Santos]

Would you want Tajo lynched or just him to talk more?

[Lamont_Cranston]

Ya talking more is always better especially this early. I am especially interested why he included me as the "second option" for his vote besides Vino. Also for him to discuss how the reasons the Vino wagon got started no longer apply.

[Santos]

Well, hasdgfas always mentions that I have not done anything. I'm not sure what else I can do. Lamont, you have a point, moreso than hasdgfas, to wonder what populartajo's plans are since he actually applied a vote towards someone that is no longer random.

hasdgfas, you were calling me out a couple times. Was there anything else? I figure since you were paying attention to me it would be nice to know if you've come to any conclusions? I can role claim if you like, but it would only help scum safe claim later.

[Fishythefish]

I can role claim if you like, but it would only help scum safe claim later.

This sounds incredibly insincere. Surely you don't think that anyone wants you to roleclaim, nor that anyone would think it was a sane idea.

FoS: Santos

[Lamont_Cranston]

I can role claim if you like, but it would only help scum safe claim later.

This sounds incredibly insincere. Surely you don't think that anyone wants you to roleclaim, nor that anyone would think it was a sane idea.

FoS: Santos

I really dont like this Santos post. It is a soft-claim. I would of preferred it if nobody had noticed it but since it has come up, I will say I find it very suspicious. Soft claims hold no merit whatsoever. They either help scum find a PR or give scum something to hide behind.

Why mention it if you have a unique PR?? The proper town action here is to force a full-claim.

Unvote, Vote Santos