Vote Count
Sotty7 3 - AA23, hewitt, Empking
Empking 2 - Khamisa, Thesp
Sotty7 is -1
Empking is -2
AA this logic doesn't work. You think everyone off my wagon is scum, but why would scum want to save a wolf? That makes no sense. Scum want the wolf dead just as much as anyone. You are trying to pressure people to jump onto the wagon with you by throwing weak suspicion over them all.AA23 Post 857 wrote:You're still being really vague and general.
It almost seems intentional.
Are you on the fence or something? If they're equally informative, your single voe switch will put us into the next day.
I figured there would be a lull.
The only people not on the wagon is the wolf it will kill, and the two probable mafiascum.
definately a lull ahead.
Basically I don't think you have done nearly enough to hunt scum, you have been almost as absent as emp. Plus you agreed with my Percy case when I first replaced in then seemed to throw dirt on it later in the day because you “forgot”. Quiet inconstant. I will also say, the modkill request sits off with me, hard to put into words.hewitt Post 862 wrote:So wait. Sotty7 what are you reasonings for suspecting me as one of the top two wolf probabilities?
Okay then, quote and show what you mean, because I am lost. You keep saying this, but I don't get it. So if you can clearly show what you are talking about so we can get on the same page that would be nice. I suspected dej and was actually the first person to bring back up his whole freaky emp relationship in this game when I replaced back in. In fact he was a tie for 3rd place in my suspect list with you.AA23 Post 863 wrote:It's not solely official steps like voting and Fosing.
It's about attention to another person, interactions, pairing suspicions etc.
Why would they want to save a wolf?Sotty7 wrote:
AA this logic doesn't work. You think everyone off my wagon is scum, but why would scum want to save a wolf? That makes no sense. Scum want the wolf dead just as much as anyone. You are trying to pressure people to jump onto the wagon with you by throwing weak suspicion over them all.
It's scummy.
No actually. You liked the case at first and then when no one else was on it you decided it wasn't as good and promptly “forgot” about it. The modkill thing irks me, the town was in a bad postion and we needed a wolf kill yet you were more than happy to call for a mod kill instead of a lynch on a player. That suggests to me that you are either scum and didn't care about dej's alignment, or you are his wolf buddy.hewitt Post 865 wrote:So basically your case on me is that I've not done much (almost not doing as much as Empking, who's done less), I didn't care much about a case you created, and that you don't feel right about me requesting a modkill on dejkha (who turned out to be a wolf).
I guess if you're his wolf partner that wouldn't feel right to you would it?
No.AA23 Post 866 wrote:I maintain that I feel Dej isn't partners with Hewitt or Emp.
And it wa Dej who was all over saying hewitt was a villain on D2 - - I think it's a bit of a stretch on your part to say that to me.
Dej: Okay, Hewiit is somewhat suspicious.dejkha Post 360 wrote:I just don't see anything scummy about his hammer. Hewitt is suspicious for being on the wagon while hardly posting anything with content and Emp is Emp, so I'll take him into consideration when I'm lost of leads.AA23 wrote:How is it you have nothing to say on Mix's behavior? The guy jumped ship like nobody's business at the sign of a faster lynch, it's mental! What are your thoughts? He hopped on the dirtiest wagon I've ever seen! All the lurkers, Emp, and HEWITT - who he hadn't fully trusted yet!
Compares Hewitt to Zwet and tries to pass of Hewitt's jump as newb play which is a soft defense on him if anything. Hewitt doesn't strike me as a newb at this at alldejkha Post 362 wrote:Ok, maybe it wasn't logical, but I've seen Zwet do it, so some people are just noobs at the game. I don't think anything of it. If you do, then good for you, keep at it and prove me wrong.AA23 wrote:And poor logic? If Mix jumped ships because that wagon built so fast, and you stayed on a wagon with Hewitt and Emp who you don't trust - - how is that logical?
Hewitt hops on a wagon and you don't think anything of it? You don't turn an eye to him?
What would I say anything about hewitt that I haven't already said? The guy hardly posts...
Here he uses your attacks on Hewitt as course for misreps and FOS's you for it. Right... he wasdejkha Post 365 wrote:You see this, people? This is AA telling me what I always do (which is in fact wrong) when we've only played one game together. Hewitt, Zwet and Emp have played with me more than that and I'm sure most of them will say I do not always do that, especially when it comes to Emp and Zwet and I'm sure hewitt will agree.AA23 wrote: Dej - I like you because of what I've seen from your playstyle, so believe me when I say it's hard for me to believe you would only acknowledge such poor logic this late!! You know what a mislynch does to a town and you ALWAYS weigh the options and possibilities out first (not to MadeofPhail's extent, but still) - -
This is also AA trying to make me look guilty by saying I joined in with hewitt on the wagon rather than saying something. Now there' two things wrong with that, one being that Hewitt hardly posts, so I'm not switching my vote to see hewitt as confirmed scum because he hopped the wagon. Two being that I was the second person on the wagon and never came off. Hewitt voted after me.AA23 wrote:Exactly my point! - - The Dej I've seen play would have turned an eye to him and found out what put him on the wagon - - you would have seen scum in hewitt for that - - not joined in on the fun and hop on the wagon!
Please, stop trying to act like you now know me so well from an single game. My first game with Zwet, I thought he was a pretty decent player and now look at what I think of him.
FoS: AA
Now he votes you for it...dejkha Post 377 wrote:Lol wow, more misrepresenting. That about does it.AA23 wrote:I'm perfectly content - - call for help all you want lol "Guys! hewitt! Lets get some dialogue!" lol - - need saving from the very people you duped into killing a towny?
Unvote Vote: AA
Says he has called Hewitt out on his lurking. Eh, hardly. Still nowhere do I see dej all over Hewitt and pressuring him.dejkha Post 396 wrote:Meta Issues On Me
My response:AA23 wrote:Dej - I like you because of what I've seen from your playstyle, so believe me when I say it's hard for me to believe you would only acknowledge such poor logic this late!! You know what a mislynch does to a town and you ALWAYS weigh the options and possibilities out first (not to MadeofPhail's extent, but still) - -
dej wrote:You see this, people? This is AA telling me what I always do (which is in fact wrong) when we've only played one game together. Hewitt, Zwet and Emp have played with me more than that and I'm sure most of them will say I do not always do that, especially when it comes to Emp and Zwet and I'm sure hewitt will agree.Claims I joined the wagon with hewitt instead of calling him out on his lurking. Now, I have called hewitt out on lurking and there was no reason to change my vote (which was thereAA23 wrote:Exactly my point! - - The Dej I've seen play would have turned an eye to him and found out what put him on the wagon - - you would have seen scum in hewitt for that - - not joined in on the fun and hop on the wagon!beforehewitt). So, he was using incorrect information to incriminate me and expected me to make hewitt my priority instead of the person I was voting for, just for that.
Some what agreeing with you. “Hewiit could be scum, but so could Zwet” This is weak at best.dejkha Post 399 wrote:That's weird because you said I "joined in on the fun". Joining =/= staying. Stay with me here. At least I can provide actual quotes to back myself up against your defenses. There's two scum groups, are you forgetting this? Just because hewitt could be scum, doesn't mean Zwet couldn't have been. If I avoided every wagon that included someone I didn't trust, I'd never be able to vote.AA wrote:And my point on Hewitt is that you STAYED ON THE WAGON when he did and didn't suspect him - - not that you joined** - - I'm saing I have a problem that you trusted a wagon with untrustworthy people (lurker)
Wow. If this is Dej all over someone I hate to think what his weak pressure looks like....dejkha Post 523 wrote:Maybe if you got involved earlier, this wouldn't have been an issue since it wouldn't have been just me and AA. And we're both taking sides on why a particular lynch is better for this day and why people are acting scummy. If you can pick as side, then it's likely you don't agree with either of us.hewitt wrote:I know but honestly I don't care about your guys' argument. If I had to pick a side I couldn't because I just don't think either side is really compelling.
Votes Hewitt for NO REASON and as I explain in my post before he drops it again at the slightest defense from Hewitt. This was a throw away vote on Hewitt, it really meant nothing. There was no serious pressure at any time in the game.dejkha Post 602 wrote:Well, as we can see, even the scummiest people can be town. I can't believe that he was, but what are ya gonna do.
While Mix made a scummy hammer, I'll let Sotty give his thoughts on the game and take it from there.
For now,Vote: Hewitt
Err what? 803 doesn't explain it AT ALL.AA23 Post 867 wrote:Why would they want to save a wolf?Sotty7 wrote:
AA this logic doesn't work. You think everyone off my wagon is scum, but why would scum want to save a wolf? That makes no sense. Scum want the wolf dead just as much as anyone. You are trying to pressure people to jump onto the wagon with you by throwing weak suspicion over them all.
It's scummy.
That has been explained in detail, Sotty, and everyone, including you, agreed with post 803
This is Thesp telling you rightly that the wolves probably don't care about you and your hypothesis. Post 857 is you talking out loud that everyone not voting is scum of some kind. That makes no sense.Thesp Post 803 wrote:I haven't the slightest clue what you're suggesting here, but I suspect the wolf didn't care nearly as much as you do about your hypothesis (whatever it might be), especially with their nightkill. I'm not surprised it was Percy, as he seemed more pro-town than anyone - I doubt he would have been lynched.AA23 wrote:I'm also concerned about the NK.
A smart wolf would have tried to discredit me and proved my hypothesis to have an inconsistency to counter the check mark from Dej's allignment.
what's everyone's thought on the NK?
The vote is weak and he drops it in a heart beat. My point is Dej isAA23 Post 869 wrote:you make an early point about how Dej acknowledges Hewitts scumplay - - now, in addition to that, Dej also voted him - he started the day off wanting him to go down.
Isn't it odd that he would do that for Hewitt (who's scum evidence is null, it's based on activity and broad interpretation) - - - and not Mix?
He flat out (and repeatedly) acknowledged Mix's lurking, lying, and scum hammer - - and did nothing.
I think he did noting because it was his partner - - you're only making that point stronger.
Dej never put energy into Mix a single time in this, or after.dejkha wrote: We should talk about how people have reacted to the claim, which AA has been doing a pretty good job of.
Scum Read:
Ace - For trying to mislead the town into thinking Dust has used an apparent scum meta in multiple games whenever he was scum. This was proven as a lie when Ace said that this only happened once when he was later called on it. Reference to posts 152 to 154
Zwet - Obviously for trying to get a counterclaim. I'm thinking avery likely werewolf.
Emp - Only loosely though, because of post 106 where he asks for a claim and tells people not to CC if he claims Seer. Like someone else said, he could've been communicating with a partner. That partner obviously being Dust.I'd also say possible werewolf.
AshMC1984 - He's made 4 short game relevant posts out of the 172 that have been made. What's there to say? Lurking scum? He unvoted after Dusts claim (his vote remained there from the RVS and he apparently never got around to changing it) and votes Zwet for voting without good reasons and trying to get a CC. He, however, doesn't mention Ace, who had the same reason for voting Dust as Zwet.
Town/ No Read:
AA23 - AA has been seemed pretty town to me in the sense that he hasn't done anything scummy that I remember, and has been generally telling us all with good reasons, who could be scum on the wagon as well as providing different possibilities.
Percy - Hasn't done much of anything scummy, but at the same time, nothing much pro-town either.
Possible Scum Pairs
Zwet/ Ace Werewolfs (Most likely) - Supported in posts 152 and 154.
Ace/ Ash Mafia (Possible)- Ash ignores Ace's reason for voting Dust, but doesn't ignore Zwet, who used the same reasoning.
Emp/ Dust Werewolves - Emp asked Dust to claim and mentions how a Seer shouldn't CC should that be the claim. If this were the pairing, it could be for two reasons. He hints at Dust to claim Seer and it would also keep his partner alive while making it look like he's keeping the towns best interest in mind.
Hopefully, when people have time, we'll have more opinions.