Newbie 799 - Katana Village (Game Over!)

[Mevorra]

Who I find the scummiest is hard to say. I don't have any of these ol' gutfeelings at the moment, but I'll tell you who I'd vote for if I had to vote in this exact second:

WeepingWind.

You figure out the reason why

[GreenDude]

@mevorra: Then why isn't your vote on weepingwind????

[Tenchi]

Deadline is tomorrow. Less than 36 hours remain.

[tubby216]

trying really hard to get caught up here,, you guys are like post-o-holics or something.

mod may i be so bold as to ask for a deadline exstension say until july 6th? pretty please with cherries?

[Tenchi]

I am making a judgment call here:

Deadline extended to July 6, 12:01 AM PST

Please do note that despite this, it will be 4th of July in the United States and some players may not be available.

---

VOTE COUNT

(3) Mevorra - nureins, edmund.angles, Belili

(2) WeepingWind - pikapizza, GreenDude
(1) Belili - tubby216

Not Voting: WeepingWind, Mevorra, James.Denholm

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: July 6, 2009 12:01 AM PST

[GreenDude]

I'm not going to be here for the last 3 days. But my vote is cast on the person I want lynched. Hopefully you guys will come to a decision and perhaps lynch weepingwind.

[Mevorra]

@mevorra: Then why isn't your vote on weepingwind????

I didn't want to scare the poor fellah!

[WeepingWind]

@weepingwind:Actually a lynch is technically a hanging which does involve a court. However, this is katana village and we don't have a court. We just have jury, executioners, and judges combined into the people of the village. If we don't base our opinions on what you say then what should we base our opinions on???

lynch: To punish (a person) without legal process or authority, especially by hanging, for a perceived offense or as an act of bigotry.

Of course you should base your opinions on what I say.

And pika isn't glad that you don't have any suspiciouns but glad that you know that you're suspiciouns are vague!
You ARE trying to stay in the background. If you actually tried to be part of the action, pika wouldn't be saying that you are trying to stay in the background.

Why is it good to know that my suspicions are vague? So if pikapizza says I am trying to stay in the background you believe him? Do you always believe what he says?

Big posts are NOT small talk extended but an entire read-up about a person. And yet again pika is right. Your big post that you just posted is a defence.
If you read through pika's post he'll show what he means by lied.
You just said that you are EXAMINING Belili and James, not SUSPICIOUS of them but EXAMINING. Why are you using those words??

So far I haven't needed to make long posts about persons. I don't see how he explains how I "lied." I said I was examining because I was examining. I am examining all of you.

That's not answering the question. The question is why aren't you defending mevorra instead of doing nothing??

Why should I defend him? I don't know for sure if he is on the same side as me, and he wants me lynched. I see no reason to defend him.

Again, that's not answering the question. The question is: Your defense was weak because you used WIFOM.

Yes, my defense is weak, and you have taken advantage of that and are trying to get me lynched.

I think Pikapizza is an invaluable player is helping us out a lot. I think he has contributed the most and that is pro-town.

Why are you saying this? I didn't attack him, in fact, you are constantly agreeing with him and defending him. Why?

[tubby216]

ok thank you mod!!!!!


i will have something of value up soon i hope

[GreenDude]

@weepingwind: You ARE trying to stay in the background. I don't need pikapizza to tell me that. He was saying it to be informative but as a scum signal.

It isn't good to know that your suspicions or vague, but it's good that YOU KNOW that your suspicions are vague.

You were asked who you were suspicious of but you didn't say that you were suspicious of Belili and James, you said you were examining them. That is not directly answering the question which is avoiding the question which is very scummy. You are also avoiding lying by saying you are examining them not suspicious of them. So I conclude that you are not suspicious of anyone and are therefore scum!

You haven't needed to make long posts because that is showing your suspicions and you don't do that. You hide the back and actively lurk. That is lying low. Only scum do that. So I conclude that you are scum!

You have misinterpreted the question again, or are indirectly answering it. The point is that people were saying that mevorra shouldn't be lynched and were doing nothing. Which is the same as trying to lynch him. And those people instead of doing nothing which leads to a lynch should do something like defend him!

Instead of having a weak defense you should have had a stronger defense and now are doing another weak defense of a weak defense! You are using crap logic in your defenses which is another scum signal!!

I am saying that pikapizza is an invaluable player because he deserves a mention. I never said you attacked him. Why are you assuming that? That seems very scummy that you are assuming that I said that pikapizza is a pro-town meaning that you are attacking him. I haven't defended pikapizza at all! And I'm agreeing with him because I think he's onto something.

Pikapizza is the one that first starting placing suspicion on you.

And yet again pikapizza was right, all your long posts are defending yourself.


What I find most suspicious about weepingwind is:

She avoids questions by indirectly answering them.

She assumes many things.

[WeepingWind]

She avoids questions by indirectly answering them.

She assumes many things.

These are things you yourself do, why are you attacking me for them? If they say that I am scum, than you must be scum also because you do the same things. The only difference is you feel the need to post a lot, and I do not.

Actually, at this point in time my suspicions are not vague at all.

[GreenDude]

I don't avoid all questions thrown my way. And I don't assume that everyone is attacking me. And it isn't a question of feeling to need to post a lot but whether you are hiding or not. You are hiding... why??

What are your suspiciouns? No wait, let me guess, me!!

[James.Denholm]

GD seems to be a fair bit emotional. And he's attacking Weeping with one hell of a furore.

Anyone got popcorn?

Weeping, please, suspicions. On the table. And, as you said earlier, you were "examining" Belili and I. Once more, I ask: Can you please share the results with us?

[GreenDude]

No. I don't get emotional. After all, it's just a game! But once I start then I can't stop. I just had to give her a piece of my mind.

But really, weepingwind IS avoiding questions.

What are your suspicions?
I am examining...




Keep going back and you'll see what I mean.

And weepingwind assumes many things:

Yes, my defense is weak, and you have taken advantage of that and are trying to get me lynched.

I am not trying to get weepingwind lynched because of her poor defense that she made a while back. I never said anything like that. She is assuming that I'm taking advantage of the poor defense which I am not.

Why are you saying this? I didn't attack him, in fact, you are constantly agreeing with him and defending him. Why?

I never said that you did attack him. Weepingwind is assuming that I think that she attacked pikapizza.

[GreenDude]

Oh, I just remember!

The other time weepingwind said that no one has "incriminated themselves". Incrimination and proving to be scum are too different things. Proven to be scum means that they are scum. Incriminated means that they only LOOK like scum. And weepingwind said that she wasn't voting yet because no one had "incrimanted themselves" enough.

@weepingwind: If you are a power-role (not saying that you are). And if you are later going to blame me for getting you lynched... now is your time to explain yourself (not saying to role-claim).



Btw, this is my last post. I'm leaving in 3 hours and I need to get ready!

[tubby216]

ok so what is the case on mevorra?

i'm alot lost in this game

[tubby216]

oh and

unvote

[pikapizza]

i am perfectly content keeping my vote where it is.

those who have not voiced an opinion on today's lynch, please do so NOW. even if you do not vote, please clarify your position before the end of the day.

also: i am on a trip in china right now (month long) and i don't really have consistent internet access (i am at starbucks drinking overpriced coffee), so i'll be less active. i will do my best to post at least once every few days !!

[pikapizza]

tubby

: then what do you think about the case on WeepingWind?

rest

: at this rate, Mevorra will be lynched - to those not voting, you are satisfied with this outcome? (despite all your words to the contrary)

i invite everybody to re-examine the arguments against WeepingWind and please EXPLICITLY STATE whether you agree or disagree. thanks.[/quote]

[Mevorra]

Vote: WeepingWind

[Tenchi]

---

VOTE COUNT

(3) Mevorra - nureins, edmund.angles, Belili

(3) WeepingWind - pikapizza, GreenDude, Mevorra

Not Voting: WeepingWind, tubby216, James.Denholm

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: July 6, 2009 12:01 AM PST

[tubby216]

ok after my re-read i think that weepingwind needs lynched

weepingwind

mainly because i agree with greendude and pika's points angianst weeping

[edmund.angles]

@Weeping: Looks like this could be your last chance to tell us your suspicions, remember the rest of us could use the analysis of a townie confirmed by lynch (if you flip town, of course). And please claim too.

[Tenchi]

12 hours remain...

---

VOTE COUNT

(3) Mevorra - nureins, edmund.angles, Belili

(3) WeepingWind - pikapizza, GreenDude, Mevorra

Not Voting: WeepingWind, tubby216, James.Denholm

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch
Deadline: July 6, 2009 12:01 AM PST

[tubby216]

oops my voting skills suck lol

vote: weepingwind