The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

[ZazieR]

You think he''s stalling, because he''s scum!
If this is true, what you did was anti-town, yes or no?
A prod would have gotten him back, or else a replacement and that player slot wouldn''t have known that somebody is suspecting him.

So who was here acting anti-town, mhmm?

[Lamont_Cranston]

You think he''s stalling, because he''s scum!
If this is true, what you did was anti-town, yes or no?
A prod would have gotten him back, or else a replacement and that player slot wouldn''t have known that somebody is suspecting him.

So who was here acting anti-town, mhmm?

No what you don't see is there is something more important than that!

HE IS STALLING FOR A REASON. HE NEEDS TO STOP NOW. WE STOP HIM BY RINGING HIS STALLING CARCASS TO L-5.

That's the only way lurkers ever get the message. Heck look at the trouble we've had with Devastation for instance... 9.9

[ZazieR]

And after he had shot, we could also ask him questions about the V/LA to see if he was lying or not and what his reason was that he came back later.

So meanwhile HE decides (scum) when the town gets the vig & lynch??

Your argument is so poor I'm starting to get the feeling you

want

him to lurk...

No, I don''t want him to lurk. Which is why I asked for a prod.
But at least if he only would have been prodded, he wouldn''t have known that you were suspecting him.
So if he kept stalling, you could pressure him when he was here. Which is better than just shouting that he''s scum when he''s not here.
True, or not?

[Lamont_Cranston]

You think he''s stalling, because he''s scum!
If this is true, what you did was anti-town, yes or no?
A prod would have gotten him back, or else a replacement and that player slot wouldn''t have known that somebody is suspecting him.

So who was here acting anti-town, mhmm?

No what you don't see is there is something more important than that!

HE IS STALLING FOR A REASON. HE NEEDS TO STOP NOW. WE STOP HIM BY RINGING HIS STALLING CARCASS TO L-5.

That's the only way lurkers ever get the message. Heck look at the trouble we've had with Devastation for instance... 9.9

And after he had shot, we could also ask him questions about the V/LA to see if he was lying or not and what his reason was that he came back later.

So meanwhile HE decides (scum) when the town gets the vig & lynch??

Your argument is so poor I'm starting to get the feeling you

want

him to lurk...

[Lamont_Cranston]

And after he had shot, we could also ask him questions about the V/LA to see if he was lying or not and what his reason was that he came back later.

So meanwhile HE decides (scum) when the town gets the vig & lynch??

Your argument is so poor I'm starting to get the feeling you

want

him to lurk...

No, I don''t want him to lurk. Which is why I asked for a prod.
But at least if he only would have been prodded, he wouldn''t have known that you were suspecting him.
So if he kept stalling, you could pressure him when he was here. Which is better than just shouting that he''s scum when he''s not here.
True, or not?

A prod won't help like the certain threat of a rope. A prod is a very WEAK way to get a response in this situation

Once again your argument is fail because a 1:1 is +village.

[ZazieR]

I prefer that a scummy player gets killed, instead of a very pro-town player.
And yes, a prod would help. If he opens it, but doesn''t post, we know he''s stalling. If he doesn''t open it, we get a replacement and should therefore get more time till deadline with hopefully an active player.
How is this fail?
Lynching lurkers is fail. Pressuring lurkers with vote is fail.

[ZazieR]

So once again

Mod, please prod Nyx

I did it the first time.

[Lamont_Cranston]

I prefer that a scummy player gets killed, instead of a very pro-town player.
And yes, a prod would help. If he opens it, but doesn''t post, we know he''s stalling. If he doesn''t open it, we get a replacement and should therefore get more time till deadline with hopefully an active player.
How is this fail?
Lynching lurkers is fail. Pressuring lurkers with vote is fail.

And how long does your prod take?? As long as he wants?? The rope is quicker and more certain.

However, on a positive note, I'm glad you prodded him.

However he needs to be rung up to L-5 because the chances of him lurking here are VERY high. The coincidence is TOO MUCH. The timing is just far too perfect.

We can get him in here FASTER than a prod with the rope.

[ZazieR]

A prod should be responded to within three days if I''m correct. If it isn''t opened by then, the mod will state that he will search for a replacement.
However, I''ve posted in bolded green now a few times, but so far the mod never responded >.<

But yeah, in case the prod will lead to the result that he''s stalling,

Vote Nyx

While waiting though, it''s time to work on some cases.

[ZazieR]

So in the end, we have decided to do both >.<

[Lamont_Cranston]

Your vote please...

[ZazieR]

See post 2108.

[Lamont_Cranston]

* FACEPALM ME * sorry, I missed it.

[Lamont_Cranston]

Ok well Like I said I really enjoy playing with you.

[ZazieR]

Mod, could we have a VC?

[Lamont_Cranston]

MOD: Votecount please

[Lamont_Cranston]

LOL!

[ZazieR]

Ok well Like I said I really enjoy playing with you.

Stop spamming >.< We''ve done a lot of this during the last few pages...
But so do I

[Lamont_Cranston]

Also:

Dramonic, Zwet, Nyx and Deves should vig-vote

The choices are Deves, Stepho with both 6 votes or another player of which you should present a case why he/she should be vig-voted over the other two.
Please choose in your next post.

[ZazieR]

Also:

Dramonic, Zwet, Nyx should vig-vote

The choices are Deves, Stepho with both 6 votes or another player of which you should present a case why he/she should be vig-voted over the other two.
Please choose in your next post.

Fixed, Deves has vig-voted Stepho already.

[Rockatansky]

What's up guys? I take it the vigging is going swimmingly?

[ZazieR]

What's up guys? I take it the vigging is going swimmingly?

Well, at this moment, we''ve got three players not vig-voting one of the bigger wagons. You are on of them. So please choose:
A. Vig-vote Stepho, who has 7 votes.
B. Vig-vote Deves, who has 6 votes.
Or C. State why the one you are vig-voting should be vigged.

[ZazieR]

Vig Vote Tally

Deadline

:

June 29

Stepho-7 (Zazier, Elmo, Pyro, Xtoxm, Sironi, Lamont, Devastation)

Devastation-6 (Stepho, Rock, Naomi, Tajo, Setael, Pablo)
Setael-3 (Amished, Zwet, Dramonic)
Zwet-1 (Nyx)

Not vig-voting scum: _

"Vote early and vote often or get the rope!"

Fixed

The Vig-vote count as of now.

[Rockatansky]

What's up guys? I take it the vigging is going swimmingly?

Well, at this moment, we''ve got three players not vig-voting one of the bigger wagons. You are on of them. So please choose:
A. Vig-vote Stepho, who has 7 votes.
B. Vig-vote Deves, who has 6 votes.
Or C. State why the one you are vig-voting should be vigged.

Cool, I'm gonna travel back in time and vote for Des I think

[Rockatansky]

^^ I mean Dev