Mastin wrote:Men?
We're not all the same gender, here. <_<
(Possible scumslip, though. The classic way for the leader of a group to address their group is to call them "men". Like, say, "the men I command are loyal to me". This would fit with a Mafia Godfather-type role.
It's a stretch, though. :/)
It is indeed a ridiculous stretch. This is the kind of thing I'm talking about in your posts. Why even mention it when you should well know that it means nothing? Why not attack him over having like two posts all game and saying absolutely nothing, that makes much more sense. Also, do you really consider things like this scumhunting?
Mastin wrote:Rolefishing. I will not answer this question.
You were the one rolefishing in the first place. You asked why Kublai Khan did not include a bunch of flavor things in his miller claim. Did you not?
Zaz wrote:Then show how this isn''t an obv fake-claim.
I'm going to break down the jist of what happened with the miller claim since you guys seem to be losing focus because of it. If my memory serves me, this is how it happened:
-KK claims his role, miller.
-Most people, including you Zaz, state that it's null and he should be judged based on his actions.
-You guys begin to press him about the miller claim for some reason and he says he's a "regular Emerald miller". So, he included his flavor along with his role this time. People flip over this. Again, for what reason I don't know. He claimed the same exact thing, just with flavor this time.
-Now people ask him what kind of a miller he is even though he already said he's a regular miller. He decides to PM the mod for clarification because of his IRC business and apparently you guys have made him unsure.
-The mod PMs him his role right back. ie, it says regular miller so that is what you are.
-People regurgitate these points again and again and again.
While I agree that he shouldn't have doubted his status as a regular miller because that is what his PM said, you guys have to keep in mind that you were the ones badgering him about if he was a death miller or not. Prior to that, I saw no suggestion from him that he could have been anything else than a regular miller. You're being revisionist and using confirmation bias Zazie. Your vote hasn't even moved the entire game has it? I think you've had some good questions put to other players in this game, but you haven't really followed up on much because you're stuck on the miller thing.
I don't personally feel he's as obv scum as you are making him out to be, and I would suggest you at least go through some of your exchanges and look at the perspective of KK being town and be a bit objective about it. If he still looks like scum to you, then by all means keep your vote.
Also, do you really think a claimed miller in a large game is going to be able to ride that claim to victory? Even if he is scum, he put a big target on his back and would likely have multiple killing factions gunning for him tonight. Say we didn't lynch him today, who would you like to see go to the gallows?
zaz wrote:I''m not sold with VP''s case, but this is one point I do agree with.
What do you disagree with in my case?
Mastin, why are you constantly trying to compare yourself to Zaz? Zazie, are you concerned about the potential of him buddying?
Mastin wrote:Every time I've seen a player word their replacement request in this way, they've been scum. <_<
You really think this is a valid scumtell? What grounds do you have for doubting johnny had RL issues?
Mastin wrote:And with that, we lose any hope of Johnny answering our concerns. :/
Perhaps you can sum up the case. I've asked people multiple times now and have seen nothing of substance beyond him wanting to policy lynch you.
Mastin wrote:Really, [my playstyle] works well for catching scum--why'd I ever need to change it?
I've yet to see that. In fact, it seems more like you spraying buckshot and hoping something hits. I think if you were more focused you'd be more effective, but that's just my opinion.
Mastin wrote:Have you SEEN VP play? I've seen him scum twice (...and thought he was town both times. :/), and he was nominated for best performance as scum.
He's difficult to metagame and pro-town regardless of alignment.
Meaning, good player, good insight,
But a player extremely hard to metagame.
(VP, do you have any TOWN games to link me to for contrast? :/)
What is the point of saying this? It looks like you are trying to make the town afraid of me or something. What other scum game did you see me in? All i know if is the one that is ongoing. Also, you can find links to my town games in my wiki.
Mastin wrote:Why check the last page?
Because that is where I first posted to say hi. I also wanted to see who was being voted and by who so I could compare it to the progression throughout the game. You're saying you would not do something like that upon replacing in?
Mastin wrote:His name was Johnny Rotten. Not M. Rotten.
Possible scumslip? (M.-->Common abbreviation for Mafia.)
It's how the french abbreviate monsseuir. Also, are you being serious? Do you consider this scumhunting?
Mastin wrote:Rofl's drop in activity is concerning...
I'm pretty sure he said that he would be ceasing to post content because you guys were acting ridiculous. Also, you should appreciate his meta since that seems to be your excuse constantly. It's a NULL TELL.
Mastin wrote:I am effective at scum hunting. I just do it differently than most
I'll believe it when I see it.
Mastin wrote:Explain how scum hunting is "useless junk". I'm scum hunting. Pointing out things I find suspicious, possible scumslips, etc.
I just do it in longer posts.
I won't deny there are some good points in some of your posts, but there is also a lot of unnecessary fluff that makes the good points seem few and far between. This is my main issue. I don't want to read a post that takes me an hour. I have a life. If you cut the fluff out and actually focused on a handful of suspects it would actually be considered scum hunting to me. Like I said before, you are just responding to every little detail and a great deal of it is unnecessary spam. I am clearly not the only person who thinks this and it is clearly something you have heard before. Perhaps you should take advice once in awhile.
mastin wrote:A little bit of fluff never hurt anyone...
It's annoying and makes me not want to read your posts. A joke every once in awhile is one thing. Having 40% of your post be composed of it is something else altogether.
Mastin wrote:Buddying...
How am I buddying with rofl by stating an opinion that I think his playstyle is more effective than yours? That doesn't even make sense.
mastin wrote:Let's see. I
-have fun.
-Get us out of the RVS.
-Scum hunt.
-Get discussion going.
-Get suspects such as you from reactions.
-And so on.
My point was saying that your posting style is not as pro-town as you think.
-Having fun has nothing to do with that.
-We would have got out of the RVS either way, and you are inflating your own self-importance on this matter.
-What scum hunting is in there is indeed pro-town, I agree.
-Getting discussion going is the same as your RVS point, and would have happened anyhow.
-How are my reactions suspect? Your posting style is in fact ANNOYING. Explain to me how finding it annoying is scummy.
-And so on is not a point.
Mastin wrote:Venting on me, when Zaz has posted fluff as well, just in a different way than I do.
What makes you ignore Zaz's fluff, and focus on mine, And result to personal attacks against me?
As much as you would like to believe you two post the same, you do not. Her posts, while plentiful, are nicely broken up and are salient. Yours are a jumbled mess. When she does post fluff, it is in a separate post I can just skim over an ignore. Yours is all jumbled together and unfocused. See the difference? And again I ask you why you are constantly trying to link yourself to Zazier?
Mastin wrote:Right. So I'm thinking VP, Khan, and Lowell are all scum together.
Because I think lynching a claimed miller over bad points on day one is a stupid play? How much stock do you really put in this theory?
Mastin wrote:1: Explain how scum hunting is "spamming the thread", and
you clearly have a loose definition of scum hunting. see above.
Mastin wrote:2: For someone who claims to have read the whole thread, you sure do make a good habit of missing the fact that this has been confirmed as a NULL TELL.
If you say it enough it must be true! At best it's anti-town. Please stop.
mastin wrote:If people refuse to read my posts, not my problem.
It's theirs. They'll look scummy for it later on.
Again, people have lives. Most do not want to stare at the computer for an hour or more just to read your posts and then have to make a post themselves. You don't even include a tl;dr of your main points. I don't blame anyone for skimming your posts.
mastin wrote:VP wrote:Why do you think this is helpful to the town?
Let's see...
-It's thorough. I let nothing slide.
-If I were mafia, my longer posts would mean potentially more slips.
-It allows me to be detailed in my suspicions,
-It allows me to outline suspicions over multiple players in the same post as an easy reference...
-It allows for a far greater level of freedom...
-Some things aren't worth commenting on.
-Not if people have to fish through a 1500 word post for a slip. Also, this is entirely WIFOM
-Detailed without any kind of focus.
-Easy reference for who though? Say someone flips scum and I as a town person want to find your interactions with that person later. It becomes almost impossible because of the sheer disorganization of your posting style.
-Freedom to do what?
mastin wrote:I do nothing of the sort--
I say my actions are a null tell.
Read:
N-U-L-L.
Not
T-O-W-N.
I am pro-town, sure, but there's no point in me bringing it up needlessly. You're stretching.
Things you repeatedly bring up again and again to insinuate how pro-town you are: most scumtells are null against such a "unique" individual like you, you claim sole responsibility for moving the game out of RVS, you inflate your importance in moving the discussion along, you are scumhunting so very very much.
No town player should have to be constantly referencing these things and their actions should speak for themselves. Do you have worries that yours do not?
Mastin wrote:Emerald is PART of the role.
NOT flavor.
Orly? Care to explain what 'Emerald' does to affect someone's role?
Mastin wrote:Testing a claimed miller to see if he slipped.
I refuse to say (hopefully I didn't already) whether he passed or failed on that flavor matter.
I call BS. You were rolefishing. And you tried to call Hayker a rolefisher for calling you on it.
mastin wrote:-And are basically trying to blackmail me.
wtf? Explain this please.
mastin wrote:Also, if you're so willing to vote for me...why the vote for Mafia? (I agree, Mafia does look suspicious--not as suspicious as you, though.)
Because clearly I think he is more suspicious. What is suspicious about me really? Seems like OMGUS and weaksauce against my predecessor more than anything.
I apologize for the long post. Mine will actually get much shorter as I get integrated into the game.