Empking may be the better play today. I need to re-read.
Sotty7 2 - AA23, Thesp
AA23 1 - Empking
Very much this. I think emp could be the play today.Thesp Post 800 wrote:Actually, if there's any "bussing", dejkha looks like he's anti-youthe whole time, but never puts forth a serious attack on you, votes you only when goaded by Percy on it, and hops off your wagon the moment Percy leaves it. It looks far more like dejkha wanted to look like he was hostile towards you, while not doing anything to seriously threaten your survival.
Unvote: Sotty7.
Empking may be the better play today. I need to re-read.
I haven't the slightest clue what you're suggesting here, but I suspect the wolf didn't care nearly as much as you do about your hypothesis (whatever it might be), especially with their nightkill. I'm not surprised it was Percy, as he seemed more pro-town than anyone - I doubt he would have been lynched.AA23 wrote:I'm also concerned about the NK.
A smart wolf would have tried to discredit me and proved my hypothesis to have an inconsistency to counter the check mark from Dej's allignment.
what's everyone's thought on the NK?
There is no “additional suspicion” on me. Your case is what you were pushing yesterday.AA23 wrote:Vote: Sotty7with additional suspicion of being "werewolf"
How in the hell do youAA23 Post 807 wrote:If MafiamislynchesEmp, we will be in twighlight with
QFT. While I agree Sotty7 is likely to be scum, I'm beginning to think that Empking is most likely to be dejkha's partner. AA23, I think the parallels you've drawn between dejkha and Sotty7 are more likely to beSotty7 wrote:How in the hell do youAA23 Post 807 wrote:If MafiamislynchesEmp, we will be in twighlight withknowit is going to be a mislynch? You can't be 100% on me being a wolf, you aren't a cop.
Funny how your whole post 807 should have both myself and emp as possible mislynches. There is no actual new information there just more fear to bend people to your way. The fact is you can input ANYONES name in for mine in your 807 and it won't lose any meaning.
question one: suspicion carries over from other days, you know. You haven't been particularily useful, and your relation with dejkha is also suspicious.Kham: You're voting me for trying to get suspicion off me despite posting before any suspicion was on me? Why are you lying? Why are you giving false reasons to your vote? Are you trying to get a mis-lynch? You're saying despite that Dej had around the most votes he wasn't scummy at all? You're saying I'm scum because you think AA is town?
I want answers to all those questions.
It seems a little naive to suggest that the case against Sotty7 is the only case with sound reasoning behind it. One of the strongest aspects of it is that dejkha talks about Empking in a hostile manner the whole game, yet seems to try to avoid having anything substantive come about from it. In fact, he relies on his "meta" of hating Emp to show hostility, which couples as a mild deterrent to anyone else getting on an Empking wagon, since dejkha's reasoning isAA23 wrote:Right now, I'm targetting Sotty with more tangable evidence attached to educated reasoning and logical application (basically, existing "hard" evidece starting with the dirty hammer, and me attaching it to theory)
Whereas the Emp notion is purely speculation and theory that isvoidof substantial evidence to the degree upon Sotty.
...
I cannot urge this enough - - - Mix(Sotty) is the more appropriate candidate for a lynch - his case is based on suspicion, theory, and actually actions that indicate not only villain, but through relationships, that he is wolf. Emp is purely thoughts and air - - speculation.
I'm guessing you mean "mafia" for scum. (When I use the term, I mean any anti-town factions, for what it's worth.) Either way, this statement is pretty humorous.AA23 wrote:What is MAJORLY unfortunate right now is that for the first time, Scum does not have the same interest as the town.
I don't think AA23 is scum, and I especially don't think he'd be scum with Empking.Khamisa wrote:can anyone see AA23 and Emp as mafia here?
Are you effing kidding me? Wait for all players to check in and give their opinions on the AA v. dejkha debate that has been ongoing for weeks? If you hadn't already stated your opinions before the modkill I don't really care that's kind of your own fault. I'm not going to apologize for asking for a modkill on dejkha after what he said. I thought (and ThAdmiral thought) it was the most appropriate action.Sotty7 wrote:Hewitt can you explain why you asked for a mod kill on dej rather than wait for all the players to check in and give their opinions on the AA v dej debacle?
Who was suspicious of me?Khamisa wrote:question one: suspicion carries over from other days, you know. You haven't been particularily useful, and your relation with dejkha is also suspicious.Kham: You're voting me for trying to get suspicion off me despite posting before any suspicion was on me? Why are you lying? Why are you giving false reasons to your vote? Are you trying to get a mis-lynch? You're saying despite that Dej had around the most votes he wasn't scummy at all? You're saying I'm scum because you think AA is town?
I want answers to all those questions.
I agree that dej went waaay over the line and deserved the modkill. I am not arguing that at all.hewitt Post 818 wrote:Are you effing kidding me? Wait for all players to check in and give their opinions on the AA v. dejkha debate that has been ongoing for weeks? If you hadn't already stated your opinions before the modkill I don't really care that's kind of your own fault. I'm not going to apologize for asking for a modkill on dejkha after what he said. I thought (and ThAdmiral thought) it was the most appropriate action.Sotty7 wrote:Hewitt can you explain why you asked for a mod kill on dej rather than wait for all the players to check in and give their opinions on the AA v dej debacle?
I'm V/LA until 7/3. My vote stands strong with Empking.
I'm suspicious of you emp, so is Hewitt and Thesp it seems. It hasn't gone unnoticed that you are only getting active now because people are gunning for you. You voted AA with a reason that no one here believes, are you even going to try and build a case on him or do you really think bussing is good enough?Empking Post 819 wrote:Who was suspicious of me?Khamisa wrote:question one: suspicion carries over from other days, you know. You haven't been particularily useful, and your relation with dejkha is also suspicious.Kham: You're voting me for trying to get suspicion off me despite posting before any suspicion was on me? Why are you lying? Why are you giving false reasons to your vote? Are you trying to get a mis-lynch? You're saying despite that Dej had around the most votes he wasn't scummy at all? You're saying I'm scum because you think AA is town?
I want answers to all those questions.
You find me suspicious because you find me suspicious?
Isn't that circular?
Do you consider it a good reason?
Who wasn't suspicious of you?Empking wrote:Who was suspicious of me?
You find me suspicious because you find me suspicious?
Isn't that circular?
Do you consider it a good reason?
AA23 & Thesp and everyone who had posted before I voted AA23Khamisa wrote:Who wasn't suspicious of you?Empking wrote:Who was suspicious of me?
You find me suspicious because you find me suspicious?
Isn't that circular?
Do you consider it a good reason?
No, I find you suspicious because of the things you've done.
This correct reasoning is not circular.
Yes, my reasoning is good.