populartajo wrote:Here is devastation.
iso 2 specially and some others have a slightly townie relaxed vibe.
posterior isos denote a short posting active lurking style.
iso 13 is his first more than one line post. His thought of the liquid leans more to the detrimental side than to the beneficial one.
his first fos of the game is for naomi. his first vote is in iso25. Again naomi. The reason is meh.
Devestation wrote:You've missed the point, the point being that its scummy AND stupid to use something if you don't know what it does.
Devestation wrote:Anyone who uses or suggests the use of any items on anyone, regardless of their scumminess or method of selection, is making themselves look scummy in mye eyes.
why?
more posterios posts tell me that dev is pretty conservative about the use of items. Like he knows the decanter will be harmful.
Devestation wrote:why can't you people think with your heads instead of with your statistics...
slightly townie here.
Devestation wrote:I don't see us making a lynch at this time without a major re-alignment, but I am pretty sure that either Stephoscope or Naomi are scum, and within 24 hours I will have made my decision as to which one to vote for.
Posterior reading tells me you didnt make your final decision like never.
Devestation wrote:In case its another 3rd person to claim gets the gun thingy, Take Shotgun
I wouldn't take it if I wasn't sure what it did, but a shotgun is pretty damn obvious.
And I think Lamont has pretty well nailed Naomi to the floor. I won't vote until she posts to defend herself though.
dev loses all his conservadurism regarding items. Supports Lammont against Naomi.
Devestation wrote:The reason why I didnt lay a vote on either day 1 was because I was unable to re-read the game.
I think you are lying. You had two choices (steph and naomi) at that time.
Devestation wrote:Setael: Why say I should be vigged without placing a vig-vote thingy? It's not particularly suspicious to me, but why anyway?
forced attack.
Devestation wrote:FoS: Setael
You dodged the question with a whole load of questions of your own. This will turn into a vote if you don't answer it next post.
I'm asking because I'm interested. I'm pointing back at it because I'm still interested and now slightly irritated that I've been outright ignored, and I find it illogical to say that "so and so should be vigged" but you don't leave an official statement as such.
hate this attack. it seems to say that because setael didnt have an official statement it means all his attacks are wrong. wtf?
more oneliners, lazy behavior, active lurking.
Conclusion : not impressed by dev's performance this game that resumes in vague oneliners. Not liking some of his forced attacks against setael. failed to vote yesterday even when he said he would choose between steph and naomi. I dont disagree witgh his vig/lynch.
Unlike you, I'm bothering to think with my head. I thought of ALL the things that the drink could do, and the vast majority were things that would harm the user, not aid them. Hence use of the item is a bad idea. It was day 1 for crying out loud.
We've been over the final decision before.
Might I point out that "I wouldn't take it if I wasn't sure what it did, but a shotgun is pretty damn obvious."
I actually originally said that I had no reason. People told me to just give a reason anyway, so I did.
Nice rewording of what I said in the FoS Setael post. What I asked for a few posts back was a reason for his vig vote on me as he provided absolutely nothing in the post except for "vig dev". He ignored me at least once, and then fired questions back. All I wanted was a reason, and not giving me one translates in my mind to "I don't have one I just wanna bandwagon" (yes I recognise the Irony
) or "To further the dastardly goals of my faction".
No I am not on during the times convenient for you being Aussie and all, of course I will look like I am active lurking.
vig vote on setael stays.
)
