Devastation-4 (Stepho, Rock, Elmo, Naomi)
Zwet-3 (Nyx, Pablo, Xtoxm)
Lamont-1 (Setael)
Pablo-1 (Tajo)
Not vig-voting scum:
Naomi when you move your vote over its always best to explain why you chose Devastation over Zwet or Set. Otherwise it looks like you are trying to hide behind being forced by the town to choose. You still need to make the decision yourself and back it up with reason. Alternatively you could hold your ground and say all three are village in your eyes and why.Naomi_Saotome wrote:Yes, but that means I'm going to have to join a wagon, for the sake of progress. I'm not happy about having to do so, but I'm not interested in voting for someone and having my vote wasted I'm here to help the town, not hinder it... Keeping my vote the way it was would be a complete waste.
With that being said:
Vig-vote: Devastation
I'm trying to figure out why an experienced player would join a 60+ page game and then claim "I-phone disability" as a reason for not properly defending or analyzing the game??Setael wrote: Also, Lamont I can't figure out what question you're saying I didn't answer. Can you state it here please? Don't just give a quite number -I mafia from my phone and it's not easy to look up old posts.
Opportunistic! You know Setael is scum...Naomi_Saotome wrote:Yes, but that means I'm going to have to join a wagon, for the sake of progress. I'm not happy about having to do so, but I'm not interested in voting for someone and having my vote wasted I'm here to help the town, not hinder it... Keeping my vote the way it was would be a complete waste.
With that being said:
Vig-vote: Devastation
Considering Devestation jumps on and off his vote on Setael, an explanation why he changed his vote, yet again... is very much in order.Devestation wrote: Shouldnt have to post my reasons at this time.
Pushes for Setael's vig without explaining his reasoningsDevestation wrote:Can we vig already...
Pyromaniac wrote:The deadline is on the 5th. It could take a while for AJ to get replaced. Dev didn't vote last on the lynch last time. We do NOT want a repeat of yesterday.
Devestation wrote: As for not voting for anyone at the end of the day, I can give you no excuse, and won't waste my time trying to create one.
Devestation wrote:The reason why I didnt lay a vote on either day 1 was because I was unable to re-read the game.
Devestation wrote: As for not voting for anyone at the end of the day, I can give you no excuse, and won't waste my time trying to create one.
In Devestation's on words he said he would make a decision in 24 hours, who he was voting for, but then failed to do so... he goes on to say that he has no excuse for not voting, but he gives us one anyway.Devestation wrote:The reason why I didnt lay a vote on either day 1 was because I was unable to re-read the game.
You stole some of whatever ser is on I assume?Naomi_Saotome wrote:^^^ I'm starting to believe that too...
I don't know what to think on Pyro though... (I may have attacked him quite a bit, but I find the way he's playing to be very poor)
He's playing like Hohum in a lot of ways... but I can't say if it's good or bad.
This is an anti-town post. She says she does not want to join a wagon, while wagons are the only way the town move forward.Naomi_Saotome wrote:Yes, but that means I'm going to have to join a wagon, for the sake of progress. I'm not happy about having to do so, but I'm not interested in voting for someone and having my vote wasted I'm here to help the town, not hinder it... Keeping my vote the way it was would be a complete waste.
steph and everybody else not voting for naomi answer this.Pyromaniac wrote:PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT VOTING FOR NAOMI OR WOULD NOT BE IF THEY DID NOT WANT TO VIG SOMEONE FIRST
Please explain how the following sequences of post do not convict naomi. I may have gotten some of the post numbers wrong. Two is the most important.
1. 998, 1002, 1006, 1015, 1028, (stalling for time)
2. 1031, 1033, 1038
Reposting since it got ignored by everybody except one person.
Although purposing polices is usually bad, I have one to suggest. How about if we get to two days before deadline, we lynch the person with the most votes.IF there are two wagons that might possible go through (one at 6, the other at 5) then we will force everybody to chose between one of those two wagons. Sound good?
I like that his first conclusion is that Lamont is prob town.Setael wrote:Finished the thread. I think Lamont is town.
His posterior case against dev is pretty good. Some debatable things that could get into the null category but still i feel a protown motivation.Setael wrote:Devestation is my #1 scum candidate, with Stephoscope #2. Pretty sure they're scum buddies.
His steph case is less impressive...Setael wrote:Seems to me that Devestation never thought lamont was scum. He knows he's town and therefore knows he's telling the truth about the shell. My guess is he unvoted to get off a townie wagon in order to avoid future suspicion.
...but still the dev-steph link he provides shows scumhunting efforts and doesnt feel forced.Setael wrote:As for Stephoscope, he's playing with the kind of self-awareness usually seen only in scum. He's very careful of what he says
iso 3Setael wrote:Really suspicious that Steph never confronted devestation, considering her reaction to lamont's statement about not wanting to drink it.
The context is the deadline hitting and Steph receiving a bunch of votes to avoid no lynch.Setael wrote:Though I still think Devestation is scum, it appears he will have to wait for another day.
unvote, vote: Stephoscope
Valid observation. Feels very indecisive about Naomi claim that is somehow acceptable (his indecisve attitude not the claim).Setael wrote:So then Naomi says to Amished "So you're saying you expected a cop like role as well?" and then POOF! magically she has a cop like role as well and says she's Bulletproof/1-shot cop.
There is a trilby clone?Setael wrote:Amished, do you have any other info/insights about the trilby clone? Any chance naomi is that clone?
Townie post.Setael wrote:As bad as Naomi's claim was, there is a chance it was due to her being a newbie rather than being scum. I am still undecided about her. She certainly needs to be posting more.
Mmm, why the change?Setael wrote:I think Devestation and naomi are both scum. Happy to see either of them die today.
Please explain how does this prove scum dont have a roleblocker. I dont get it.Setael wrote:Everyone please go to p. 47 and read Post 1174, especially the last paragraph where he explains why the scum "don't have a roleblocker".Amished wrote:I do want to point out that since hohum's life was extended for a day (and I lived), they don't have a roleblocker (either faction/player in the case of an SK). I will be safe and be able to prevent the reality shift when that happens as I'll use one of my protections on myself for sure until that time just help out the most.
I dont like this post. This was the original quote:Setael wrote:I do find his claim suspicious, but I certainly do not think he should be killed. I would not vote him or vote to vig him today, and I would be suspicious of anyone who did. I do, however, think his claim is overpowered if there is no scum roleblocker which HE SAID. Not me.
You seem to be very sure of the fact that scum dont have a roleblocker. What made you agree with Amished?Setael wrote:Also, has anyone ever heard of a dr. that protects themself as well as a multitude of other people? Especially without a scum roleblocker? How is that balanced?
This is a slightly frustrated townie post.Setael wrote:Any townies on my vig wagon please reread today's posts. You either haven't been reading carefully or you're misunderstanding something.