The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

Rockatansky · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:54 am

vig: dev

Devestation · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:25 am

explain please.

dramonic · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:07 am

Some news from our studios, I'll be taking over Shadow Knight's position as anchorman!

Now to read the 60 pages of this fight @_@

Pyromaniac · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:27 am

We tend to talk a lot. I bet we will get over 200 pages.

populartajo · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:28 am

Im sick and for that reason V/LA until tomorrow.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:17 pm

Vig Vote Tally

Setael-3 (Pablo, Lamont, Pyro)

Pablo-2.5 (Amished, Setael, Tajo)
Sironi-2 (Zwet, Naomi)
Devastation-2 (Stepho, Rock)
Stepho-1 (Sironi)
Zwet-1 (Nyx)
Tajo-1 (Xtoxm)
Lamont-.5 (Amished)

Not vig-voting scum:

Devastation, AJ, Elmo

"Vote early and vote often or get the rope!"

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:19 pm

dramonic wrote:Some news from our studios, I'll be taking over Shadow Knight's position as anchorman!

Now to read the 60 pages of this fight @_@

Welcome!

MOD: Please prod AJ & Stepho

Stephoscope · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:46 pm

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
dramonic wrote:Some news from our studios, I'll be taking over Shadow Knight's position as anchorman!

Now to read the 60 pages of this fight @_@
Welcome!

MOD: Please prod AJ & Stepho

He doesn't need to prod me, I'm here. Trying to figure out why others apparently aren't seeing my case against Devestation.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:09 pm

Ya, I'd like to know because at this point I don't see it. Funny, I was just thinking of reading you and Rock to see what I was missing.

Stephoscope · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:21 pm

I spell it out in 1363. Something's unsettling about how he credits you with the case on Naomi.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:33 pm

Post #1363 for everyone's reading pleaseure:

Stephoscope wrote:
Stephoscope wrote:
Devestation wrote:And I think Lamont has pretty well nailed Naomi to the floor. I won't vote until she posts to defend herself though.
Don't think that I forgot that yesterday you were saying you were going to vote for either me or Naomi...and while I understand Lamont's position, I relentlessly attacked Naomi's claim yesterday.
I think Devestation needs to die based on his shift in thinking. I spent a lot of time yesterday attacking Naomi's claim...and yet I was still on Devestation's list of suspects...now all of a sudden Devestation's giving credit to Lamont for outing Naomi's supposed scumminess, even though in my opinion Lamont hasn't hit Naomi nearly as hard as I was yesterday.

I'm starting to think Naomi's claim really is legitimate, based on posts from both her and the mod today.

I reserve the right to change this, but for now:

Vig vote:
Devestation

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:39 pm

LOL. Kind of funny how everything is revolving around Naomi and we are all changing our views. I still don't really believe her claim.

I gave you credit for your suspicions because if she is scum there is no way you would be bussing her at the end of D1.

It looks to me like a case of him just looking at the latest posts and running off those.

@Stepho:

Where is he still suspecting you after N1 had passed?

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:43 pm

Devestation wrote:I don't see us making a lynch at this time without a major re-alignment, but I am pretty sure that either Stephoscope or Naomi are scum, and within 24 hours I will have made my decision as to which one to vote for.

Ok this is post #987 it appears he is saying that

either

you OR Naomi are scum; in other words if Naomi is scum, you're not and vice-versa.

I think his point is very true here.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:46 pm

Although on second thought you both could still be town; just because you hit her claim hard doesn't make you scum necessarily as her claim was very, very poor.

Devestation · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Wed Jun 17, 2009 11:34 pm

they could both be scum Lamont.

Right now I'm too tired and depressed to care

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:35 am

Well place a vg vote, it will do you some good.

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:38 am

Devestation wrote:they could both be scum Lamont.

Right now I'm too tired and depressed to care

For them both to be scum Stepho and his buddies would have to be saying that she is SO worthless that they just want her dead no matter what. That would be a chilling reality that my mind refuses to believe actually.

Pyromaniac · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:39 am

PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT VOTING FOR NAOMI OR WOULD NOT BE IF THEY DID NOT WANT TO VIG SOMEONE FIRST

Please explain how the following sequences of post do not convict naomi. I may have gotten some of the post numbers wrong. Two is the most important.

1. 998, 1002, 1006, 1015, 1028, (stalling for time)
2. 1031, 1033, 1038

Pablo Molinero · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:44 am

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Devestation wrote:they could both be scum Lamont.

Right now I'm too tired and depressed to care
For them both to be scum Stepho and his buddies would have to be saying that she is SO worthless that they just want her dead no matter what. That would be a chilling reality that my mind refuses to believe actually.

Two scum groups?

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:00 am

Pablo Molinero wrote:
Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Devestation wrote:they could both be scum Lamont.

Right now I'm too tired and depressed to care
For them both to be scum Stepho and his buddies would have to be saying that she is SO worthless that they just want her dead no matter what. That would be a chilling reality that my mind refuses to believe actually.
Two scum groups?

Aha, great point. The other thing I just thought of was the fact that if the scum (or those on her team if two groups) thought that her wagon woudn't take it

would

be a great bus.

Naomi_Saotome · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:24 am

@Pyro, you're pulling for my lynch really hard, aren't you?

I can see the case on Devastation...
Right now I see three targets for my 1-shot
some of which are on the vig list...

Pyromaniac · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:25 am

Naomi_Saotome wrote:@Pyro, you're pulling for my lynch really hard, aren't you?

How is this bad? It is amazingly obvious that your claim is BS.

Naomi_Saotome · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:43 am

I want to know when you decided that I was scum? Was it when you saw my claim, or was it my stance on the Decanter? All in all, you came out right and said I had to die, before you really had evidence to back it up... then you disappeared after people stopped siding with you, only to re-appear when you thought you had more to incriminate me on.. You're lurking scum...

Lamont_Cranston · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:47 am

Naomi why can't you be scum that made up a Trilby claim at L-1?

Naomi_Saotome · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:00 am

What? That has nothing to do with the fact that he's been gunning for me before anyone really knew anything about me, he's been popping in only often enough to look like he's contributing to the game and then he disappears again...

Well, until there's a counterclaim, or until I'm confirmed in my role, there's no real way to know, now is there?