Mastin wrote:The key to catching the RVS in any given game:
Log in before Mastin does.
Or be online when Zaz first posts something in the game
Mastin, about the Misa stuff, I did all that due to
this. Somebody stole the role that is perfect for me >.<, and now, that player will pay for it
As for the prettier comment, ABR is in this game. I'm not gonna link for this reason >.<
As for metaing (Yes, it's a word >.< Say it's not, and you'll feel the consequences
) I know it's not foolproof. It's failed me lately. But I'm positive that I'll be correct one game, so I'm now working towards that >.< Besides, ZEEnon is scummy.
I've already explained why I'm doing the many posts. But are you using that as a comparison towards my point against ZEEnon?
Of course you can have fun. Don't I do the same in my games?
But like I pointed out, even the flying pumpkin seemed more likelier to have in this game >.<
Also, later it became more obv to me that you were joking. At the start, I didn't know what to think. I don't think it means anything for now.
And I thought as well that Lamont tried to get you modkilled (he later said that that wasn't his attention, so I'll have to look at that as well), however I don't see anything in that quote that was a modkillable offense
Mastin wrote:1: It got us out of the RVS, even with so few players, in a VERY short time span,
2: It got us debating,
3: It got us scum hunting,
4: It caught scum,
5: And gave me an excellent read on most players at the time,
6: And I imagine will continue to help me get a read on other players weighing in.
I disagree. Selfvoting can be seen as scummy depending on the players involved. I've seen a self-vote in three games now. The first two, both the main discussers about the self-vote were town. One of the players involved was scum though in both cases, but as most players were looking at the main discussers, this player got barely noticed. In the third game, scum self-voted at the start as he always does that. Can you guess who that was, Mastin
?
Due to the other two examples, I think it's bad as it gets us out of the RVS, but with a weak attack in which many players have a different vision to even when not based upon allignment. So 1 is perhaps true, but it lead to a bad 2 and 3. I disagree with 4. Which leaves only 5 and 6. And these reads will change with the players who are looking at it if they look at it.
tl;dr I think traps are bad for town.
We'll see at the end if it actually worked, but at this moment, I don't think it did.
As for the connection, I pointed it out in case one of you flip. I will get back to that connection I pointed out if/when that happens.
As you probably later saw, I don't think you should be lynched based upon the claim in the RVS alone.
You probably also saw that I asked Kai why he thinks you're obv-town, not you. So let him answer.
And yeah, you indeed commented right after Lamont asked the mod to look at that quote. However, I don't get the impression that you see it as scummy when you first responded to it. Only after Kai responded to it, you give me the impression that you see it as scummy.
Exactly, only if a pro-town player gets the Death Note, it will be destroyed. And have you seen the bit I underlined in that post?
Also, this:
Tah Rules wrote:Any scum player possessing a Death Note is Kira. There can be multiple Kiras, even at the same time, and there even can be no Kiras.
This implies to me, that at least one scum player has a death note. So I say that your point is invalid.
Is this aimed at me
If so, I'll answer this when Magnus has finally given his reason for voting Lamont.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}