Mafia 95 - Quick & Dirty - Game Over!

[Xylthixlm]

Based on the assumptions that Pap Zito used his one shot vig on night one, that there are no more than two one-shot vigs in the game and that there is only one scum group, Papa Zito a) killed BC and b) was the skum NK. We should be focusing our attention on Papa Zito's posts to be looking for a reason why he was the target.

Add this post to things I don't like about izzy's play in this game... Trying to figure out WHY someone was nked pretty much never leads to catching scum, and ends up being nothing more than WIFOM.

Actually, it's sometimes useful as one more data point to support a case. I'd never use kill speculation as the only reason to suspect someone though.

Also, Izzy's post you quoted makes me think she's probably town.

[Xylthixlm]

Something is weird about sam.samhorn's attack on inHim.

sam: What first made you think inHim is scum?

[lazarusmoth]

Reckoner comments that xyl is ignoring votes and suspicions thrown at him in the hopes that it will disappear. (post 318)

Is this what inhim is doing by not responding? Xyl, is this another one of the tricks you say that both of you learned at your "secret temple"? Like the consecutive one-two BW punch for kise?

[Xylthixlm]

Is this what inhim is doing by not responding?

Ask inHim.

[Phoebus]

Based on the assumptions that Pap Zito used his one shot vig on night one, that there are no more than two one-shot vigs in the game and that there is only one scum group, Papa Zito a) killed BC and b) was the skum NK. We should be focusing our attention on Papa Zito's posts to be looking for a reason why he was the target.

Wait, what?

What are the bases for these assumptions?

I think I will have to re-read a bit today.

Kise played so archetypically that it didn't seem possible he'd town...

[xRECKONERx]

I'd say inHim today, Izzy tomorrow.

[inHimshallibe]

I apologize to the players and mod in this game for my absence - I'll post on Saturday.

[ConsonantM]

i am not positive i am enjoying the bandwagon on inHim. Post of more content l8ter 2nite, if i am lucky.

[ConsonantM]

sam.samhorn
is having a birthday!

Happy B-day, sam.

While I do not fully endorse this suspect, the logic in this post was very solid.

Reck expresses a willingness to bandwagon,

Cat posts a solid case, here,

But I REALLY dislike Reck's bandwagoning here.

Brilliant Content[/sarcasm].

[cateraction]

I agree that Reck is not being pro-town at best, at worst scummy.

[xRECKONERx]

Totally scummy.
Let's just say that I don't like to rehash old cases on people if it's already been said. If what someone says makes sense logically, I'll voice my agreement.

[Xylthixlm]

I agree that Reck is not being pro-town at best, at worst scummy.

He's totally misdirected, but my gut reaction to him feels more like OMGUS rather than him actually being scummy.

[xRECKONERx]

Awwwww.... STALL OUT!

I think ConsonantM's post is very odd. He likes the logic used against Izzy, but doesn't endorse pursuing Izzy as a suspect? I don't like the lack of explanation for why something logical wouldn't be the right choice, especially in this game.

[sam.samhorn]

Something is weird about sam.samhorn's attack on inHim.

sam: What first made you think inHim is scum?

Bandwagoning. If you aren't scum, then inHim is, and vice versa.

[Xylthixlm]

Something is weird about sam.samhorn's attack on inHim.

sam: What first made you think inHim is scum?

Bandwagoning. If you aren't scum, then inHim is, and vice versa.

This seems familiar.

[Rhinox]

sam.samhorn
is having a birthday!

Happy B-day, sam.

While I do not fully endorse this suspect, the logic in this post was very solid.

Reck expresses a willingness to bandwagon,

Cat posts a solid case, here,

But I REALLY dislike Reck's bandwagoning here.

Brilliant Content[/sarcasm].

Is there a measurable opinion in here somewhere? I mean, clearly you dislike how Reck is playing today, but you express it kinda passive-aggressively. No vote, no questions... what are your intentions here, because it kinda sounds like you're saying "Reck is scummy" and then moving on without doing anything about it.

[sam.samhorn]

Something is weird about sam.samhorn's attack on inHim.

sam: What first made you think inHim is scum?

Bandwagoning. If you aren't scum, then inHim is, and vice versa.

This seems familiar.

Bandwagoning in the manner inHim did is scummy.

[cateraction]

So we have 5 days till deadline, anyone have any better lynches than inHim?

Inhim: You said you'd post saturday but didn't. What gives?

[Rhinox]

yeah...

izzy.

or possibly consonantM

[DizzyIzzyB13]

Based on the assumptions that Pap Zito used his one shot vig on night one, that there are no more than two one-shot vigs in the game and that there is only one scum group, Papa Zito a) killed BC and b) was the skum NK. We should be focusing our attention on Papa Zito's posts to be looking for a reason why he was the target.

Wait, what?

What are the bases for these assumptions?

I think I will have to re-read a bit today.

Kise played so archetypically that it didn't seem possible he'd town...

I would have thought that the implication of my post was obvious - that I'm taking credit for the Lamont_Cranston kill and claiming One Shot Vig.

[Xylthixlm]

I would have thought that the implication of my post was obvious - that I'm taking credit for the Lamont_Cranston kill and claiming One Shot Vig.

I wasn't sure if that was deliberate or a slip. Be less subtle.

[Rhinox]

I would have thought that the implication of my post was obvious - that I'm taking credit for the Lamont_Cranston kill and claiming One Shot Vig.

I wasn't sure if that was deliberate or a slip. Be less subtle.

I'm not sure I'm a fan of that claim.

For 1, aside from my vote, you were under very little pressure, so a claim wasn't really warranted. Also, your claim is entirely unverifiable. And really, why would a 1-shot vig kill on N1 anyways? Seems like it'd be smarter to wait until being more sure of hitting scum.

So I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

[sam.samhorn]

I would have thought that the implication of my post was obvious - that I'm taking credit for the Lamont_Cranston kill and claiming One Shot Vig.

I wasn't sure if that was deliberate or a slip. Be less subtle.

I'm not sure I'm a fan of that claim.

For 1, aside from my vote, you were under very little pressure, so a claim wasn't really warranted. Also, your claim is entirely unverifiable. And really, why would a 1-shot vig kill on N1 anyways? Seems like it'd be smarter to wait until being more sure of hitting scum.

So I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

Just because "I don't think it makes sense" doesn't mean Izzy is scum.

[sam.samhorn]

sam.samhorn
is having a birthday!

Happy B-day, sam.

This was a fake birthday I put up for the sake of getting an account through. My real birthday is in September. Sorry to disappoint :p

[Rhinox]

I would have thought that the implication of my post was obvious - that I'm taking credit for the Lamont_Cranston kill and claiming One Shot Vig.

I wasn't sure if that was deliberate or a slip. Be less subtle.

I'm not sure I'm a fan of that claim.

For 1, aside from my vote, you were under very little pressure, so a claim wasn't really warranted. Also, your claim is entirely unverifiable. And really, why would a 1-shot vig kill on N1 anyways? Seems like it'd be smarter to wait until being more sure of hitting scum.

So I'm sorry, but I don't believe you.

Just because "I don't think it makes sense" doesn't mean Izzy is scum.

You think I only think izzy is scummy because of her claim?