Lynch All Lurkers Mafia! GAME OVER

Xylthixlm · Post Post #3125 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:54 pm

populartajo wrote:
ortolan wrote:this town gets the rubber stamp of fail
any reason why you are calling SSK town?

The fail is that

you aren't lynched yet

.

populartajo · Post Post #3126 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:58 pm

ortolan wrote:and no, lynching me is not acceptable as I am in none of my potential scum teams and I have never said it is guaranteed tajo is scum but simply that his lynch is optimal

OMG. What do you mean you are not in the potential scum teams? According to who? According to Kinetic, who is more prob scum than SSK?

And for fucking sake, you have said all day things that I need to die and that im obv scum lynch plox.

Backtracking much?

Sorry scum, you are busted. You and Xyl need to die now. You thought you had this on the bag, dont you?

Unvote Vote : Ortolan.

populartajo · Post Post #3127 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:00 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
populartajo wrote:
ortolan wrote:this town gets the rubber stamp of fail
any reason why you are calling SSK town?
The fail is that
you aren't lynched yet
.

And this is directed to who? Before the SSK vote it was all good times, (look he even voted for tajo) right Xyl?

Theres no a single reason to call SSK town even at this point of the game.

ortolan · Post Post #3128 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:04 pm

tajo is not scumhunting, he is trying to avoid being lynched

he's very obvious scum

if he, laughably is town, we lynch Kinetic afterwards.

Can we please finish this game I don't wish to draw out the inevitable tajo-lynch any longer.

ortolan · Post Post #3129 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:05 pm

He votes Xyl then solely because MafiaSSK votes me he follows.

Let's watch the movement of Empking's vote now

populartajo · Post Post #3130 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:09 pm

ortolan wrote:tajo is not scumhunting, he is trying to avoid being lynched

he's very obvious scum

if he, laughably is town, we lynch Kinetic afterwards.

Can we please finish this game I don't wish to draw out the inevitable tajo-lynch any longer.

Oh good, now Im back to be obv scum.

You are free to say whatever the hell you want, Ort.

But you are not thinking like a townie. Why the hell My flip incriminates Kinetic? That doesnt make sense AT ALL. It CLEARLY incriminates you and Xyl.

ortolan · Post Post #3131 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:18 pm

no, if you are not scum the only other option is Kinetic (and Kinetic/Xyl is a plausible scumteam but we can cross that bridge when we come to it).

populartajo · Post Post #3132 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:22 pm

ortolan wrote:no, if you are not scum the only other option is Kinetic (and Kinetic/Xyl is a plausible scumteam but we can cross that bridge when we come to it).

explain why kinetic is the only other option
because im clearly not seeing it

Ether · Post Post #3133 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:22 pm

Day 5, Block 1, Votecount 4 wrote:4 populartajo (ortolan, Xylthixlm, MafiaSSK, elvis_knits)
2 Xylthixlm (Empking, Stephoscope)
1 ortolan (populartajo)

1 Unvote (Kinetic)

8 alive; 5 to lynch.

Edit:Day fixed.

Ether · Post Post #3134 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:31 pm

Er, disregard that:

Day 5, Block 1, Votecount 4 wrote:3 populartajo (ortolan, Xylthixlm, elvis_knits)
2 ortolan (MafiaSSK, populartajo)
2 Xylthixlm (Empking, Stephoscope)

1 Unvote (Kinetic)

8 alive; 5 to lynch.

Edit:Day fixed

Kinetic · Post Post #3135 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:57 pm

Now THIS is interesting... Three wagons with a veritable equal chance of success...

And I'm the odd one out. Very odd position for a townie. I'm going to need to do a lot more reading right now before I make a move.

ortolan · Post Post #3136 (ISO) » Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:10 pm

Kinetic (3135) wrote:And I'm the odd one out. Very odd position for a townie.

Yes...it is.

MafiaSSK · Post Post #3137 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:39 am

Xylthixlm wrote:As usual, I have no idea what mafiassk is thinking. Do you think orto is more likely to be scum than tajo?

Yes.

elvis_knits · Post Post #3138 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:32 am

ortolan wrote: if he, laughably is town, we lynch Kinetic afterwards.

Why kinetic?

ortolan · Post Post #3139 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:42 am

cause only alternative at that point is Kinetic/probably Xyl.

elvis_knits · Post Post #3140 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:48 am

ortolan wrote:cause only alternative at that point is Kinetic/probably Xyl.

And you pick kinetic over xyl because?

Empking · Post Post #3141 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:52 am

ortolan wrote:cause only alternative at that point is Kinetic/probably Xyl.

Why is Zyl not a possible lynch?

ortolan · Post Post #3142 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:13 am

Best to lynch a mason on the off-chance they are gambiting scum

ortolan · Post Post #3143 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:14 am

but...if you would prefer I could lynch Xyl after tajo is that is what is desired

but at this rate we're not going to lynch tajo, town is going to throw the game away

elvis_knits · Post Post #3144 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:18 am

The masons are being very uncooperative.

If we can't lynch tajo, let's lynch a mason.

ortolan · Post Post #3145 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:18 am

no. let's lynch tajo. not lynching him is unnaceptable.

elvis_knits · Post Post #3146 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:21 am

I'm still voting him... I'm trying...

ortolan · Post Post #3147 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:26 am

why do you think it is so hard to lynch the scummy "tracker"? Do you think it might be because he is scum?

Stephoscope · Post Post #3148 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:27 am

elvis_knits wrote:The masons are being very uncooperative.

My vote is where I think it should be. It is really time to go in a different direction here.

elvis_knits · Post Post #3149 (ISO) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:51 am

ortolan wrote:why do you think it is so hard to lynch the scummy "tracker"? Do you think it might be because he is scum?

Yeah and his buddy(ies) aren't bussing.