Percy wrote:
Again you are misrepresenting my arguments.
Percy wrote:
"I can only lynch one person, so I've picked one person and made my decision. That's not singling anyone out".
Percy wrote:
AA23 544 wrote:The "Ace/AA23 combo" - - can I please get some evidence backing that?
Read my posts, ffs.
Percy wrote:
Just read that again, slowly. Perhaps your reason will catch up with your stream of consciousness and reveal to you how absurd this statement is.[
Percy wrote:
Remember all those posts where you were begging, screaming and yelling to be heard about the Mix case?
I've been asked to sharpen my gameplay to be less arrogant - - I'll ask that you don't go into a mean rant like that again - you were nothing short of nasty toward me in that post Percy.
And hypocritical.
You say I misrep. you and you seem to have confused misrepresenting with
misunderstanding
- - however, you only use the one word because it makes me seem scummier. - - you paraphrased me incorrectly - - are you misunderstanding or misrepresenting me?
Percy wrote:
You aren't looking at the rest of the game. You keep reminding us that there are other villains out there - so why concentrate on one potential villain?
I'm not - I'm VOTING for one and am cognizant of two - - nobody else has given any major scum reads - - this isn't complicated.
At the end of your post you listed your scum reads.
You seperated two from the rest. - why? I'd like to see if it's for the same reason I did and finally clear this idea you can't seem to grasp about me.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two people have demonstrated scum qualities - Ace and Mix - everyone else is neutral to me with nothing more than suspicions void of much evidence
2 people.
I've worked on one case - and have maintained the other person is suspicious and worth investigating.
I've done nothing more or less than any of you. We all have a vote, we all have people we would like to investigate D3 - - What exactly is it I'm being accused of?
It seems that in the desperation to get more votes on the Ace case - I am being tarred and feathered and called scum when all I'm doing is scum hunting - - it's cheap and lousy.
In regards to the Ace matter
I have done no flip flopping.
I read conversations where everyone said he had lied, I even discussed - but upon a re-read it struck me as hyperbole, and the idea of it being intentional was susicious and mailicious to me - - he earned and FoS from me.
Nothing has changed. Not a single thing. I have in no way said he was innocent. I have in no way gone back on my proclaimed suspicion and voted him further. He has remained what I said he was to me VERY early in this game.
That being said.
-Ace suggested he played multiple games with Dust where his scum meta matched the present game
-It was learned only one of these games was on MS and was inconsistent
-The off-site games hold the truth that we still don't know. Was it accidentally hyperbole and there was something off-site?
-Was he using the off-site to his advantage and maliciously lying?
-
It is a variable
- - a variable that is SUSPICIOUS, but until proven false, is not a SCUMTELL. Hence I found him suspicious
-His lurking and attitude in the gameplay doesn't fit his meta in the game I played with him where he was town - - however Dej has earlier suggested to me that one game is not enough to know somebody well enough, so that is a null tell.
- I felt that his "I forgot about this game" comment was a hannibal lecter style gloating, smug smirking poke in of "having fun?" - - we all play this game, and we all know that you don't post in other active games and forget about one that is far from a lull and rvs
- Very suspicious, but could be a bias mentality on me part because I've been suspicious of him.
Mix did something that logically only helps scum - My vote stays with him, my suspicion stays with Ace for investigation, and everyone else is a null read to me because there is no evidence of scum (however one is cautious as there is 5 total)
1.From what I've explained, how am I excluding people and not just working with what I have?
2.Do you understand that there was no flip floppery on Ace from me? That seemed to be twisted in an ugly way to make me seem like scum (very weak evidence at that) - Where is the evidence on me aside from the childish attitude of "He's not voting him, he must be friends!" - that is NOT justice - where is my freedom to vote who I feel a better scum lynch?
3. Ace and Mix are our two strongest cases. Nobody finds Emp's active lurking and vote on me an issue? As though he's keeping it there and lurking for D3 while we fight out today and lynch tonight?
Percy wrote: Would you have been satisfied if I had simply said "Well, AA, I have my own case, you go do your thing"?
Start talking about the Ace case
.
Or else what? And how much further since he hasn't been here?
This is the kind of thing that makes me feel bullied and I lash out at - - YES - I do expect you guys to respect the choices I make the same I respect yours
I was passionate about making sure you all understood the case - I stand by that - I not once told you to get off yours, or demanded your votes -
***I've kept the arrogance down - I would appreciate no more personal jabs or negativity - this is a two way street and I'm more than willing to be civil***
