Open 148: Jungle Republic (Game over) before 800

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Sun May 31, 2009 4:42 am

Vote: Khamisa

Datadanne · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:03 am

Comon guys, Stop flaking.

Edit: Lol i edit posts.
Edit: Lol i edited it again.
Edit: SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM
Edit: lol the town is screwed
Edit: Lol this setup has too many bad roles

Tarballs · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:13 am

Thanks to some of you rushing the day 1 lynch, I don't have much to work with here. I'll go with my vote from last day, as I can't find any reasons to change it.

Vote: OGML

Khamisa · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:03 am

Can anyone explain the case on fallen angel? Was there even a case?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:03 am

Khamisa wrote:Can anyone explain the case on fallen angel? Was there even a case?

Eh. The biggest anti-town thing he did was that he wanted to lynch the cop on day 1 for OMGUS reasons.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:45 am

Yosarian2 wrote:
Khamisa wrote:Can anyone explain the case on fallen angel? Was there even a case?
Eh. The biggest anti-town thing he did was that he wanted to lynch the cop on day 1 for OMGUS reasons.

Yos, why would you answer that question when you know its a blatant waste of time and obvious active lurking?

Unless you're just trying to look active without doing anything too. Hmmm...

Sotty7 · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:29 pm

Khamisa Post 153 wrote:Can anyone explain the case on fallen angel? Was there even a case?

There was a case, if you were around you might have seen people post about it. In fact you unvoted your random vote when the wagon on FA was at it's peak. If you didn't see/agree with the case then, why didn't you mention it?

Yosarian2 · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:39 pm

OhGodMyLife wrote: Yos, why would you answer that question when you know its a blatant waste of time and obvious active lurking?

Because the question was a trap, obv. So I figured I'd walk into it and see what happened.

iamausername · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:42 am

Khamisa wrote:Can anyone explain the case on fallen angel? Was there even a case?

Waiting until after it's already occurred to decry the lynch means you're not actually interested in trying to prevent a town lynch, you just want to look good by not being part of it.

Vote: Khamisa

Datadanne · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:36 am

Votecount:

2 - Khamisa (OhGodMyLife and Iamausername)
1 - OhGodMyLife (Tarballs)

6 to lynch.

Datadanne · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:39 am

Datadanne wrote: [05] One "bah" post is allowed.

Wulfy · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:33 am

Tarballs wrote:Thanks to some of you rushing the day 1 lynch, I don't have much to work with here. I'll go with my vote from last day, as I can't find any reasons to change it.

Vote: OGML

This seems scummy since you just kind of bail on actually finding a reason to vote based on turned roles. Who seemed to refuse to vote FA as though they knew FA was town? Who seemed to work together yesterday, etc, should give you more than your first pick. Plus, how is your first pick valid NOW?

People voting Khamisa: Reason? I could have just missed it, but I don't see any reason for the votes yet, so if you have one or want to refer me to a previous case, I would love to see what you're thinking. (That is the best move to see what people are thinking, AMIRIGHT?)

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:38 am

The basis of my khamisa vote is more fully explained by what I said yesterday:

OhGodMyLife wrote:Khamisa is also scum, likely the other group. My gut says Kham is a wolf considering the danger of leaving CJ alive for a mislynch tomorrow, given her slimy undermining of confidence in CJ's claim.

Which in turn was based on these two nuggets:

Khamisa wrote:CJ's claim was bad. At least we know who we're lynching tomorrrow if he's not dead.

Khamisa wrote:CJ Miller is digging a deeper hole.

Khamisa's presence today has been 100% active lurking with a dash of "I told you so," which only adds to the lynchability.

iamausername · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:41 am

Wulfy wrote:People voting Khamisa: Reason?

iamausername wrote:Waiting until after it's already occurred to decry the lynch means you're not actually interested in trying to prevent a town lynch, you just want to look good by not being part of it.

CJMiller · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:09 pm

Datadanne wrote:
Datadanne wrote: [05] One "bah" post is allowed.

SCREW YOU!

Datadanne · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:48 pm

Stop that attitude CjMiller.

Wulfy · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:50 pm

CJMiller wrote:
Datadanne wrote:
Datadanne wrote: [05] One "bah" post is allowed.
SCREW YOU!

Anger issues?

iamausername wrote:
Wulfy wrote:People voting Khamisa: Reason?

iamausername wrote:Waiting until after it's already occurred to decry the lynch means you're not actually interested in trying to prevent a town lynch, you just want to look good by not being part of it.

I understand. Missed that then, huh?

Oh, and the case for me is that I thought it was a ploy as a mafia aligned player to "clear" themselves by hoodwinking us. See my voting post, but the other reasons was just generally scummy play. I felt mafia the moment I read that post, and even now, I am still shocked that she wasn't mafia. It...was just...I feel terrible for the screw up. But, live and learn, as they say.

Tarballs · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:15 pm

Wulfy wrote:
Tarballs wrote:Thanks to some of you rushing the day 1 lynch, I don't have much to work with here. I'll go with my vote from last day, as I can't find any reasons to change it.

Vote: OGML
This seems scummy since you just kind of bail on actually finding a reason to vote based on turned roles. Who seemed to refuse to vote FA as though they knew FA was town? Who seemed to work together yesterday, etc, should give you more than your first pick. Plus, how is your first pick valid NOW?

First of all, there's no one here who

knew

FA was town. Werewolves may have thought he was mafia, and mafia may have thought he was a werewolf. I had a newb town read of FA, so him flipping town didn't surprise me as much as it seems to have surprised some of you.

OGML seemed the most suspicious to me when I first voted him, was the most suspicious until the hammer, and remained the most suspicious when FA flipped. And thus far nothing has happened today that would change my mind about that.

Wulfy wrote:Oh, and the case for me is that I thought it was a ploy as a mafia aligned player to "clear" themselves by hoodwinking us. See my voting post, but the other reasons was just generally scummy play. I felt mafia the moment I read that post, and even now, I am still shocked that
she
wasn't mafia. It...was just...I feel terrible for the screw up. But, live and learn, as they say.

It's 'he'.

And you shouldn't defend yourself, when no one's really even blaming you for the hammer. You gave your reasons when you hammered, no use to add anything to it now.

Mod: Prod Mastin, Caboose and Korejora please.

CJMiller · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:12 am

Wulfy wrote:
CJMiller wrote:
Datadanne wrote: [05] One "bah" post is allowed.
SCREW YOU!
Anger issues?

Yes.

*goes back to being dead*

Datadanne · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:00 am

CjMiller, This is your last warning.

Mod: Prod Mastin, Caboose and Korejora please.

Humping, Bumping

Prodding Peeps soon.

Korejora · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:38 am

O HAI GUYZ

brb rereading.

Wulfy · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:52 am

Tarballs wrote:
Wulfy wrote:
Tarballs wrote:Thanks to some of you rushing the day 1 lynch, I don't have much to work with here. I'll go with my vote from last day, as I can't find any reasons to change it.

Vote: OGML
This seems scummy since you just kind of bail on actually finding a reason to vote based on turned roles. Who seemed to refuse to vote FA as though they knew FA was town? Who seemed to work together yesterday, etc, should give you more than your first pick. Plus, how is your first pick valid NOW?
First of all, there's no one here who
knew
FA was town. Werewolves may have thought he was mafia, and mafia may have thought he was a werewolf. I had a newb town read of FA, so him flipping town didn't surprise me as much as it seems to have surprised some of you.

OGML seemed the most suspicious to me when I first voted him, was the most suspicious until the hammer, and remained the most suspicious when FA flipped. And thus far nothing has happened today that would change my mind about that.

Wulfy wrote:Oh, and the case for me is that I thought it was a ploy as a mafia aligned player to "clear" themselves by hoodwinking us. See my voting post, but the other reasons was just generally scummy play. I felt mafia the moment I read that post, and even now, I am still shocked that
she
wasn't mafia. It...was just...I feel terrible for the screw up. But, live and learn, as they say.
It's 'he'.

And you shouldn't defend yourself, when no one's really even blaming you for the hammer. You gave your reasons when you hammered, no use to add anything to it now.

Mod: Prod Mastin, Caboose and Korejora please.

First: Good point. I do suppose that is completely true.|

Second: I'm not defending myself. Someone asked if there "even was a case on FA."

I explained the case as I saw it.

Korejora · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:12 am

Well. That was unenlightening.

Current comment:
Wulfy - analysing situations instead of people. Knowing the angles is helpful, but I can't gauge him because I don't see enough opinion.
Caboose & Khamisa - post moar.
Yos - worth noting that I have no comment. Plenty of content but I'm still unsure.
iamausername - seems town. Might have to check meta.
Tarballs - /agree

The other players don't jump to mind after the reread. (Who did I skip? OGML, Sotty, and Mastin, I think.) I'm reluctant to make a decision this early in the day with us at half to half odds with the scum.

Khamisa · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:21 am

OK, for one, let's consider the reasons for votes on the fallen angel lynch.

Yosarian2 - Random Vote. Later explained by random reasons.
Mastin - Rolefishing?
Iamusername - not quite sure, looks a little random
Sotty7 - based on meta. Note that FA is fairly new has only completed two games.
OGML - No explanation in vote post. probably agreeing with earlier suspicions.
CJMiller - For being last to confirm and yelling NOT SCUM. Note that this was the same person who claimed seer under no pressure.
Caboose - Based on her "plan", which actually has good reasoning, but note that it was the hammer.

This case was weak, and with no deadline pressure (I think), we chose this simple lynch? I'm going to say that at least two of the people on this lynch are scum.

OhGodMyLife · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:24 am

Khamisa:
1) Do you have any conclusions on who exactly could be scum based on that riveting analysis, or are you just going to sit on your hands and wait for someone else to figure it out?
2)

Khamisa wrote:CJMiller - For being last to confirm and yelling NOT SCUM. Note that this was the same person who claimed seer under no pressure.

Why do you insist on taking another potshot at the already dead and confirmed town guy?