While I can't speak for Hoopla, I will respond to your points here. I asked who you targeted on night 3 because I was surprised there was only one death, and it's not like the scum is going to tell us what it did. I think asking about what you did is a total nulltell...while scum might be interested to know what you did, so would townies. Assuming you're a vig or an SK (I don't buy Hoopla's two-faction idea), no one else in the game really knows what you are, right?Kise wrote:I'm good with Hoopla & Steph being candidates for a possible lynch. I don't favor the way they posted at the beginning of D4, asking who I targeted. And judging by past comments, it looks like they were the 1st two who wondered if Jazz would do a full-blown RC. Jazz made a softclaim, but by what I'm reading, Hoop & Steph blurted the question of whether she was the vig.
As for Jazzmyn...softclaims are bad and anti-town. She had dropped enough hints that it was time to insist that she claim.
As for what I think...
I think there is a real case to be made against Hoopla today.
The strongest evidence against her, which I have never forgotten about all game, is referenced back in my post 374, back when AshKetchummm had her role. Ash started acting *really weird*, and now that we know LesterGroans (later dramonic) was scum, look how odd it is that Ash was apparently answering questions before they were asked (note posts 333 and 334...and then try to tell me who else Ash could have been "answering" in 333). Looks like evidence of nighttalking.
I also remember how she had Zach as a part of her top two scum combos, but then voted for Lester anyway. That didn't make sense to me...but maybe they'd agreed it was bussing time at that point with all innocents killed so far.
And while I'm the one who originally asked about game balance today, which I do think it's the right time to discuss, I'm not liking how Hoopla's quickly saying that I'm scum seemingly based only on her own guesses about the game setup. She may be kind of backed into a corner.
