PhilyEc wrote:Zito wrote:1. Until my hunt, he was just making contentless posts and trying to appear townie by asking for information. (yes, yes, Corp posted this too)Yup and something that was very vote worthy when he first pointed it out
2. Going after an easy target, a lurker/flaker, who can't defend himself instead of someone who would actually answer. Again to try to earn townie points.Agreed, chasing the policy lynch/ lurker is the easiest lynch considering theres little defense avaliable
3. Failing to adequately defend himself against pretty much anything I've said.Nulltell, scum have little reason besides ill will but town can just fail.I saw Shotty was merely playing a hiding under the radar type of gameplay. Never getting involved in major topics of discussion, rather yelling the most expected lines of town, one by one.My case was basically within my post of the vote.
At the moment his defense is poor but the fact that he now thinks your scum for pointing out an obvious flaw in his gameplay adds to why I shouldnt change my vote.
You call that a case? I looked more hostile than you thought? You've ignored all the points I've made in 285 and didn't answer any of my questions. Also it isn't OMGUS that has me voting for him, if you've been reading ANYTHING out of those arugments or even the list in 285 I have about 6 different reasons independent of "pointing out a flaw in my play" that reads him as scum. I've gone through every post he's made point by point, how much more organization can you want? You put it IN YOUR OWN POST (152) that I wasn't going after him and that was a bad thing. Now I was trying to lynch him and that's a bad thing too? The hypocrisy astounds me! You've posted nothing new or even incriminating about me and your putting the hammer vote on me for the end of the day. At least Zito tries to hide his bandwagoning by making his own posts and actually writing responses to me, you copy paste one of his posts as your "case" and even contradict yourself in the process, terrible. Watch this one in the coming days folks.PhilyEc wrote:Come into suspicion after I announced them as my suspects. Had I been late saying this there would've been another 'Phily jab' =P
Zito, its strange but when I read your quotes of Shotty they seem more hostile than I'd previously taken them to be. Hes definately on guard and not being organised about collecting his thoughts.
Shotty > Gadget, at the moment. Vote Shotty
