Not voting (6) <-~ Nuwen, AceMarksman, populartajo, springlullaby, ekiM, hp [leaves]
Deadline wrote:
Deadline wrote:
ekiM wrote:Do you think the looming deadline might have had something to do with it?hp wrote:The extreme speed of my wagon also increases the chance that I'm the Chosen (or the first post I made. Revealing the entire scumteam.). I hope I'm not.
They were pushing for the lurker's lynch when there was a better option: Law the scummy flip-flopper. So I think it's likely.
I'm mad suspicious of anyone saying "Oh, I'm probably the Chosen, guys, so we best not lynch me". Hp-Law bus is not out of the question here.
Explain this.hp wrote:There is also a link between [Law] and populartajo so I want tomorrow's lynch to be [Tajo].
Law flip-flopped many times on Tajo. I see that as a connection. It was most likely scum buddying up a townie, though.
Please give some reasoning when you state conclusions like this. Just asserting things doesn't help us much.hp wrote:Lynchlist analysis: Law's scummate was bussing him.
1) Scum wants me to get lynched.
2) Everyone wanted me lynched also wanted Law lynched.
3) Bus.
You're really just asserting your innocence here.Ace wrote:I was calling it as I saw it. ABR is an erratic player, and I made the comment that what he said looked like scum proactively protecting his partner. I wasn't trying to set up two lynches.
Scum never do things that draw suspicion to them? Depends what the pay-off is, I think.Ace wrote:Besides, your scenario is stupid because that would make me a target the day after and there are only two scum.
That's easy to say in retrospect. At least three townies were voting for you, for quite legitimate reasons. You've just admitted you were lurking. Why were you lurking?hp wrote:They were pushing for the lurker's lynch when there was a better option: Law the scummy flip-flopper. So I think it's likely.
Huh? If you think Law was buddying up to Tajo-town, why do you want today's lynch to be Tajo? This makes no sense.hp wrote:Law flip-flopped many times on Tajo. I see that as a connection. It was most likely scum buddying up a townie, though.ekiM wrote:Explain this.hp wrote:There is also a link between [Law] and populartajo so I want tomorrow's lynch to be [Tajo].
I don't follow this.hp wrote:1) Scum wants me to get lynched.
2) Everyone wanted me lynched also wanted Law lynched.
3) Bus.
Because?hp [leaves] wrote:Unvote, Vote ekiM
obvscum
care to explain this?hp [leaves] wrote:My vote has done its duty.Unvote
I'm sorry, but wasn't law's flip-flopping one of the reasons I voted him in the first place? This entire point is WIFOM and boils down to "Law is too experienced to flip flop like that except for on his scumbuddy." No, this is not a strawman of your argument, it is an accurate summary. Furthermore, this is a load of bull because if law is as experianced as you claim (which I failed to see from his play yesterday), then he would know not to flip-flop like that as scum. Why do you think that he would only flip-flop on a scum buddy?spring wrote:See Lawrencelot flipflop vote on Ace. My stand on this is that Law is too experienced to be so bad as to do that kind of flip flop as scum without a real motive. I think that what happened there was that he figured it wouldn't matter as he was voting his buddy, and thought that it would help his camp anyway if one of them flipped.
This was another point I was pushing against law. This point is both bullshit and unfair. It is bullshit in connection with your first point as you claim law to have some experience in the game of mafia. If this is true, then he wouldn't try and so obviously bus his parter especially when I called him out on it. Law was scum trying for an easy lynch. It's unfair because it's an argument against me that I can't truly defend against because it hinges on someone else's actions. You have just decided to contort the circumstances to paint me in the worst possible light. That is not a pro-town course of action.spring wrote:It is also true that each time he voted/unvoted Ace was following a moment in which Ace was garnering attention/pressure was easing on Ace. This would be consistent with someone wanting to secure a good non-bus looking vote on a buddy, but not really wanting to push the case on them.
again, contorting law's actions to paint me as scum.spring wrote:See also the case Lawrencelot wrote on Ace, and compare it to his certainty of tone while voting Tajo later in the day.
This is the ONE SINGLE POINT against me that I ACTUALLY SAID. That said, it is horribly misconstrued. It did look like ABR was chainsaw defending/proactively protecting law, and you're calling me scummy for pointing this out?spring wrote:On Ace's side, see both time he drew a link between ABR and Law in an incongruous manner and without justification in the middle of the day whereas there was only 3 votes on Law. I think what happened there was that Ace got a bit panicky about Law getting lynched, and tried to set up a mislynch.
No, bad spring. No blanketing suspicions. I want specific quotes with detailed analysis.spring wrote:There are also multiple individual scumtell on Ace's part, I still think what I wrote about him yesterday is true.
Oh wow this is what, your first post today? Who lacks initiative? Plus, I was hiking over the weekend.spring wrote:Plus, the total lack of initiative today
I don't think that you should need anyone else to tell you to respond, thank you.springlullaby wrote:Yeah, pretty sure I'm arguing with scum. If anyone beside Ace want me to answer, please ask, and I'll do.
This doesnt look like bussing at all.AceMarksman wrote:I was the first one on your wagonlaw wrote:but for example Ace and ABR just joined my wagon without good reasoning.
This is a terrible bus if Ace were scum. If he were scum he wouldnt push a weak case against his scumpartner.AceMarksman wrote:Ha! Scumslip. There are no power roles besides the chosen one and the chosen one does not know that they are the Chosen one, as cleared up by incog in the first posts of the game:law wrote:Don't lynch me, I have the most powerful protown role of the gameTherefore you would not know if you were or were not the chosen one. A townie would have no reason to claim this, however the mafia would have every reason to claim this hoping the rest of the town would forget about incog's clarification above. Sorry law, you made it too easy.incog wrote:To clarify since I've gotten this question a bit: The Chosen One willnotknow that he or she is the Chosen One. His or her role will be revealed upon death though.
This is what ABR has called as setting up mislynches. I disagree. This is some decent speculation since it passed through my mind at some point. Again, the possibilities of bussing this hard when there are only two scum are lower.AceMarksman wrote:Here's what I think happened here. First, I think law and ABR are scum together. Second, to avoid them getting lynched, ABR put together a "do not lynch" list including the two scum and two townies. Third, there isn't a third.
Thoughts on this?
More hard attacking.AceMarksman wrote:I've got some computer access today (yey!) and reading through, I found this little scummy nugget:Note, this is (another) point where my wagon is cooling off but law still gives excuse to jump right back on it when it picks up again.law wrote:Unvote, might switch back to Ace later.
And more.AceMarksman wrote:I'm starting to think law is scummier than ABluRker at the moment. I would make a case, but I'm stressed out because of AP exams. Expect one soon. However:
Unvote, Vote: law
And more.AceMarksman wrote:@ law leaning scum: he jumped on my bandwagon here based on gut right at the moment my wagon is picking up steam. He then unvotes me (when my wagon is cooling off), promising a case (which has not come yet), and the re-votes me once my bandwagon picks up steam again. He hasn't made much of a case against me. He's being really opportunistic.
What kind of scum votes his scumpartner that early?Law wrote:Since these are my highest suspects at the moment, I'll Vote: AceMarksman. Mostly gut, but I don't have much more this early in D1.
What kind of scum revotes his scumpartner that early?Law wrote:I'm still not that sure about q21. I'll wait for his replacement to catch up and then reconsider. But for now, Vote: AceMarksman.
I would bet money that the remaining scum is in the rest group.Law wrote:Good lynches:
hp
Not bad lynches:
Ace, ABR (if you don't take chosen stuff into account)
Worse lynches:
populartajo, no lynch?
Bad lynches:
rest
This.hp [leaves] wrote:Lynchlist analysis: Law's scummate was bussing him. I'll read these three for how hard they pushed for the lynches.ekiM wrote:*Lawrencelot(5): spring, Nuwen,Claus, Tajo, ekiM
* hp [leaves] (5): spring, Nuwen,Lawrencelot,Claus, ekiM