Not Voting - 1 (Jazzmyn, Netlava, Light-kun, JereIC, tubby216, HowardRoark, DraketheFake)
7 alive, 4 to lynch
-Mod
(Vote Count accurate as of Post 807)
DtF and I explicitly asked him not to until we've had the claims, so he's off the hook for now.Netlava wrote:Has anyone noticed that LK STILL has not addressed the killer whale theory? It was mentioned like 1000x times already.
I'm not sure if he's scum. But, he might be, and I want to know why LK didn't include him on his suspect list.Netlava wrote:While we're at it, explain why you think tubby is scum.JereIC wrote: You have to explain your opinions now, so please explain why you don't think tubby is scum.
First off, just because you don't accept his claim doesn't mean you don't have to distinguish your claim from his. How does that even make sense?Netlava wrote:I saw your claim. That doesn't mean I can accept it for sure without knowing your alignment.
Why is the answer given when the question is asked?(100) wrote:Drake, I agree with your read on ZEEnon, but I'm not sure why you find DDD scummy when Nuwen is using basically the same arguments. Could you point out what exactly made DDD's post scummy and Nuwen's posts not? Is the fact that he's jumping votes while Nuwen is just backing up her original vote with a serious argument?
Post 205 he makes his case and votes Debonair Danny DiPietro. The response points out a flaw in the case and JereIC respondsDDD’s explanation of his vote for ZEEnon feels like he’s hedging his bets. In some places he calls ZEE crazy suspicious, but in other posts he undercuts his own argument by saying ZEE’s play is usually a town-tell (speaking of which, is there such a thing as town-tells?). He’s also built an argument about why lynching ZEE could be good even if he is a townie, which I feel is anticipating ZEE turning town. Also, posts 125 and 133, where he asks people to chime in on Freeko’s post, feel like he’s trying to start a bandwagon without being the first vote on it.
The discussion with the accused continues and(217) wrote:Sorry about that, I got the posts confused. When I've got more time I'll respond to your other points.
Setting up to slide onto the wagon? Buddying? A quick note?(232) wrote:I'm going to review freeko's posts, but you, HowardRoark, and Fishythedelishy have made some good points about him.
Preparing to change wagons.(267) wrote:Freeko, your posts have lost all touch with reality, and I'm leaning towards voting you now. DDD has responded very coolly and rationally under pressure, and while it may be an act, it looks a lot better in comparison to you totally freaking the hell out crazy-style for no apparent reason.
More slowly moving to the freeko wagon. freeko fails at self voting. We get that wonderful "claim" and JereIC hammers.(304) wrote:Not sure how I feel about freeko. On the one hand, I think he's more likely to be anti-social than anti-town, and I think he's a convenient target. On the other hand, Nuwen is right, his arguments are terrible and somewhat scummy, and I think he's the scummiest player in the game at the moment. If he can't post a rational self-defense soon I'll probably vote him.
and proposes his "killing us all (DtF, Fishy, and me) and letting mod sort it out" plan.(470) wrote:I want to take a second pass at the last two-three pages before posting on them and making overall conclusions, but here's some posts I took interest in. This review focuses on DtF and Fishy, but I have some notes on other players that I need to develop before posting.
More playing the uncertainty game.(541) wrote:I think Fishy is becoming more scummy by default. He hasn't said anything to hang himself, but his defense hasn't been good, and he had done a poor job explaining why he changed his mind from being against ordering your kills to being for it. I want to see how he responds to Nuwen's post that I pointed out before deciding whether or not to vote for him. On a related note, I think DtF is acting oddly. Sometimes he's saying that the three of us are townies caught up in a flawed voting pattern analysis, other times he seems to be building cases against me and Fishy.
(615) wrote:So, here's why I find Fishy (and, to an extent, DoctheFake) scummy. Their rationale for pushing LK to claim is that they thought he'd screw up, and then they could push for his lynch. That's preposterous. LK's lie was clumsy, but no one could have reasonably anticipated a massive disconnect between the flavor and his actual claim. Therefore, their post hoc justification strikes me as opportunistic, especially since they've both backed down when other people started criticizing it. In particular, Fishy's claim that he unvoted LK because LK promised not to kill tonight doesn't make sense. You think the guy's lying about his species in a scummy way, but he's telling the truth about what he's going to do tonight?
I intend to hammer, and I'd like a claim from Fishy.
This is based on the species inconsistancy brought about by the Krill. He then moves on to further his case against Fishythefish and throw in his vote.(634) wrote:I think DtF is telling the truth about his species. However, he could be mafia, and his backstory is that he's trying to push the little Adelie penguins out.
Hindsight: Who? How?(638) wrote:I think LK is pro-town, and is clumsily trying a lie that he thinks will expose scum. I think it's worked to an extent.
There is some more interaction with Fishythefish and Drakethefake based on this.(638) wrote:I'm pretty sure DtF is scum. His doc claim doesn't make a lot sense if he's scum, but it makes way less sense if he's actually the doc or a townie. {snip} HR is my third guess, mostly because he seems to support your arguments a lot, and how quickly he backed down from his abortive case against me earlier. Net strikes me as pro-town: his case against me and for you may be weak, but I think he honestly believes it.
I'm not sure what you mean here.JereIC wrote:First off, just because you don't accept his claim doesn't mean you don't have to distinguish your claim from his. How does that even make sense?
> I saw your claim. That doesn't mean I can accept itJereIC wrote:Secondly, you said in post 768 that you think DtF is pro-town. If you're not sure of his claim, why don't you lean towards him being scum?
Apparently you didn't notice that he was asked to wait until all species claims were complete. Since that is complete . . .Netlava (795) wrote:Has anyone noticed that LK STILL has not addressed the killer whale theory? It was mentioned like 1000x times already.
Of my remaining likely mafia:JereIC wrote:If I had to vote now, it'd be Tubby. In retrospect, his focus on Fishy day 2 looks scummier - and there's not much else from from Tubby himself. However, Nuwen also looks scummy now. Since DtF's doc claim has gone unchallenged, and I'm not about to claim scum, it appears her Fishy-DtF-me analysis was wrong. I could chalk that up to human error, but so few suspects left it seems more likely she was trying to divert our attention (and was doing it pretty well, actually).
Netlava (815) wrote:I actually think LK might be vig looking at the role-claims.
Is this based on DraketheFake's statement in 812? Being new to this site, I will not just accept yourNetlava 2 minutes later wrote:SKs are not always required to kill. Most of the time, they're free to choose, especially in mini normals.
How does that excuse you?Netlava wrote:As for my "passivity," I point out that no one except for fishy was in danger of being lynched yesterday.
It is interesting. Even more interesting is the fact that you neither mention apparently dropping JereIC as a suspect nor why Jazzmyn and tubby216 have become your suspects.Netlava wrote:Lastly, it's interesting to note that my suspects are the last to point out who they find scummy today.
My post was in response to this:Are you switching back to Light-kun SK? If not, why bother mentioning it?
Where did you get the idea that I've dropped JereIC as a suspect? And I'm planning to make a post (if needed that is) on who my other suspects are.It is interesting. Even more interesting is the fact that you neither mention apparently dropping JereIC as a suspect nor why Jazzmyn and tubby216 have become your suspects.
Earlier when I said "Light-Kun=Killer Whale," I had no reason to lie. There is no humans here, as far as I know. (Unless they're the mafia, but whatever.HowardRoark wrote:Netlava (815) wrote:I actually think LK might be vig looking at the role-claims.Is this based on DraketheFake's statement in 812? Being new to this site, I will not just accept yourNetlava 2 minutes later wrote:SKs are not always required to kill. Most of the time, they're free to choose, especially in mini normals.mini normal SK no killstatement as truth. Are you switching back to Light-kun SK? If not, why bother mentioning it?
How does that excuse you?Netlava wrote:As for my "passivity," I point out that no one except for fishy was in danger of being lynched yesterday.
It is interesting. Even more interesting is the fact that you neither mention apparently dropping JereIC as a suspect nor why Jazzmyn and tubby216 have become your suspects.Netlava wrote:Lastly, it's interesting to note that my suspects are the last to point out who they find scummy today.
@Light-kun: Why are you ignoring the requests to confirm your "Kiler Whale" claim or to honestly claim?
mod: prod tubby216 and Jazzmyn
V/LA 22-29 MAY 2009
_______________
Let's go Pens!
Based on the fact that you said "Lastly, it's interesting to note that my suspects are the last to point out who they find scummy today." (which I quoted). Since JereIC had already named his vote preference, that statement seems to exclude him from your suspects.Netlava (821) wrote:Where did you get the idea that I've dropped JereIC as a suspect?
So you have JereIC, tubby216, and Jazzmyn . . . how many other suspects do you have? And, yes . . . I believe that it is necessary to provide some details on who you suspect and why.I'm planning to make a post (if needed that is) on who my other suspects are.