The Manor: Chzo Mafia (Game Over!)

[Alabaska J]

So far according to my memory there have only been two people that advocated d1-no-lynch as go poof:

Xtoxm & SAJIN

I don't think there is a 3rd person...

And btw what do you think about random assignment vs. town-wide voting?

Would you accept a two-phase voting where the two top town chosen people are identified and then everyone votes on A or B?

What the hell?? I never advocated a D1 No Lynch, and wouldn't.

Both Xtoxm and SAJIN have said that not using the elixir is like advocating NL D1.

Hohum has said that he thinks there is a connection between those who say that and those that volunteer to consume the elixir.

In other words he is positing the theory that people are trying to force the elixir to be used on themselves with this argument.

I only posted the two people who said this from my recollection. I'm not saying I am agreeing with his theory but just posting data to help explore his theory.

lol i'm pretty sure they were saying that BECAUSE they don't advocate d1 no-lynch. they were comparing it to something bad to point out its usefulness. reading comprehension is tech.

[Lamont_Cranston]

Correct AJ, if they had read Hohum's argument correctly they would see that is what he was saying

[Devestation]

"What damage would the village suffer if this was the case and since the risk to the village of using an item increases with each passing day why not try ONE item to see if the "battle of items" is actually taking place?"

*sigh*

Using an item will not tell us if there is a battle of items. Just because ONE item shows up good it doesnt mean that another item will kill the user or have a similar effect. To me it sounds like you want us to get used to the items so that one backfires at the critical moment!

[Sajin]

@Hohum the majority of the post you reference in 450 is sarcasm. I thought it was obvious.

@Devestation: Do you think we could use the possible effects of items to verify people with?

[Lamont_Cranston]

"What damage would the village suffer if this was the case and since the risk to the village of using an item increases with each passing day why not try ONE item to see if the "battle of items" is actually taking place?"

*sigh*

Using an item will not tell us if there is a battle of items. Just because ONE item shows up good it doesnt mean that another item will kill the user or have a similar effect. To me it sounds like you want us to get used to the items so that one backfires at the critical moment!

That could happen but if we don't try at least one we will have no way to know if they are for our beenfit at all. I'm willing to take the risk on the first item to gain the potential knowledge of something that could be so necessary to our success.

The part of me that agrees with you is swayed by the above statement.

[Devestation]

Is agreeing to disagree on the Decanter issue a scummy thing to do?

[Lamont_Cranston]

Could be. If you are scum and know/think that the item is to our benefit than you're opposing its use in the face of a strong town argument would definitely be scummy.

[Pyromaniac]

So, uh what did I miss? Nothing. Nothing at all.

*plays a little jazz flute to liven up the room*

we need to generate discussion. how does everyone feel about no lynches?

Shadow knight is a LYAR!

[Amished]

@Dev: Judging from the first drop post, the drops will be randomized so there won't be a deliberate getting used to items to then have one screw with us.

[Amished]

Amished, out of curiosity, is your name "Amish Ed", or is it "amished" like a past tense verb?

Like a past tense verb -_-

[Lamont_Cranston]

Well then change ur name to Amishscott!

[Devestation]

I seriously disagree with the idea of using the item, but if the town votes to use it, go ahead and hit your damned wasp nest

[Stephoscope]

I'm going to be away for the next 48 hours or so. I have family coming in for my graduation (I have no idea why graduation is scheduled for a Thursday, but it is).

[Devestation]

Maybe its because Friday will be your last day?

[populartajo]

Sorry guys, if my V/LA doesnt get better in the following two days, I'd likely ask for a replacement.

Dont worry yet.

[Lamont_Cranston]

@Shadow Knight:

Could you post a list of people that have not voted for the elixir?

If we can at least get the votes settled then we can move forward, right?

[Amished]

Because Amishscott isn't nearly as cool as Amished.

BTW: I hate Sajin's 628. Unless there's a clear indicator of sarcasm/joking in the post (there is none) saying something is a joke later is a huge scumtell in my eyes.

[Shadow Knight]

First- I asked what others thought about no lynches, where does this say "I likez noe lynches, we shud doo that!"?? Misrepping and do so badly. Reading is tech.

So, uh what did I miss? Nothing. Nothing at all.

*plays a little jazz flute to liven up the room*

we need to generate discussion. how does everyone feel about no lynches?

Shadow knight is a LYAR!

Second- When did I become the elixer vote bitch? *grumble*

[Knight of Cydonia]

Players are reminded that from Saturday onwards, all PMs regarding role actions, item actions, or queries should be sent to MafiaSSK as well as myself.

[Lamont_Cranston]

[quote="Shadow Knight"]Not really. Just didn't see any reason to get involved in a fight when hohum wasn't even here. We had no reason to think that hohum would agree to do as we wished. I'm ok with me drinking it. My question though, is if you think I'm lurking, why would you want me to drink it?

Elixer Votecount etc.[quote]

I thought you liked it.

[UnofficialRulerOfEveryone]

Sorry guys...

Just replace me

, I shouldn't have tried to get into a game before school was completely over.

[Pyromaniac]

First- I asked what others thought about no lynches, where does this say "I likez noe lynches, we shud doo that!"?? Misrepping and do so badly. Reading is tech.

So, uh what did I miss? Nothing. Nothing at all.

*plays a little jazz flute to liven up the room*

we need to generate discussion. how does everyone feel about no lynches?

Shadow knight is a LYAR!

You were originally the one who began the talk about no lynching. I would say that equals suggesting it. Asking how everybody feels about it in that way implies that you support it.

[Alabaska J]

First- I asked what others thought about no lynches, where does this say "I likez noe lynches, we shud doo that!"?? Misrepping and do so badly. Reading is tech.

So, uh what did I miss? Nothing. Nothing at all.

*plays a little jazz flute to liven up the room*

we need to generate discussion. how does everyone feel about no lynches?

Shadow knight is a LYAR!

You were originally the one who began the talk about no lynching. I would say that equals suggesting it. Asking how everybody feels about it in that way implies that you support it.

i think the "let's generate discussion" qualifier beforehand rules out that possibility

[Amished]

AJ is right here too. Pyro is climbing up my scumladder mighty quickly.

[Sironigous]

Shadow (3)- Pyro, Shadow, Naomi
Lamont (3)- Steph, Alaska, Nueva
Siro (2)- Lamont, Naomi
Nyx (1)- Amished
Alaska (1)- Naomi

not voting, everyone else!

---

Ah, I'm sorry. I couldn't read too much today. I had to do something useful though. Be back tomorrow!